Latest News

Teamsters ask judge to stop UPS from offering buyouts of $150,000 to drivers

A lawyer for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters said to a judge that the union expects more than 10,000 United 'Parcel Service drivers will accept $150,000 buyouts, if the 'delivery -giant can proceed with its planned workforce-cutting plan.

Michael Feinberg, a union attorney representing 320,000 UPS employees, gave this estimate when he asked Chief U.S. district Judge Denise Casper to stop UPS from implementing the buyout plan.

The Teamsters claim that the union initiated the buyout without negotiations, in violation of the?2023 contract. Teamsters also contend that the provisions of the?2023 contract prohibit UPS from entering such agreements with individual drivers.

The union sued UPS on February 9, after UPS announced plans on January 27 to close 24?facilities and cut up to 30 000 jobs as it tries to get away from millions low-profit delivery for its biggest customer, online retailer Amazon.com.

UPS introduced a previous buyout program in the?year prior to that, which was also opposed by local Teamsters unions. The program offered eligible drivers $1,800 per year in severance, with a minimum of $10,000. Feinberg stated that only?3,000 drivers took UPS up on its offer, which led UPS to increase the amount of severance pay offered to them.

He said that if UPS continues to roll out buyouts to 105,000 employees who are eligible, "tens of thousands will be seduced" to apply in hopes of winning the $150,000 jackpot.

Feinberg stated that those who accepted would be forced to leave their jobs in accordance with arrangements which could later by ruled as improper by an arbitrator. Without an injunction from Casper, it would be "impossible" for them to return, Feinberg added.

He said that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for an arbitrator to rectify the situation.

James?Nelson, a UPS lawyer, countered the union's claim that the contract was too broad to allow it to offer buyouts?to its unionized driver. He stated that the alternative was to force UPS to lay off drivers, as the contract allows.

Casper said he did not have the authority to issue an order in the dispute.

Nelson stated that if she did so, it would interfere in UPS's efforts to reduce the driver workforce in order to deal with an 8.6% drop in package deliveries, which it expects will continue in 2026.

Nelson stated that the company was looking to offer people a?opportunity' to leave in exchange for a substantial financial reward.

Casper didn't immediately make a ruling but she said that she would be making a decision "shortly." (Reporting from Nate Raymond, Boston; Lisa Baertlein, Los Angeles; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi & Aurora Ellis).

(source: Reuters)