Latest News

Supreme Court gives Trump's order to mail in ballots a boost, but legal battles continue

A federal judge has blocked the implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order that restricts the use of mail-in votes ahead of the November midterm elections.

Monday, the?U.S. The Supreme Court lifted the judicial order and gave him a victory, but there are still other challenges.

What is the Executive Order?

The order, issued in March, directed that the Department of Homeland Security compile and send to each state a list of U.S. Citizens eligible to vote, and that the Justice Department investigate and possibly prosecute state and local officials who give ballots to those deemed to be "not eligible" for federal elections.

The U.S. Postal Service must?deliver only ballots to voters who are on the approved mail-in voter list of each state.

How did the legal challenges play out?

California, along with a grouping of 22 states, and Washington, D.C., filed a lawsuit to stop Trump's directive, claiming that it would lead to confusion and disenfranchise many voters before the midterm elections.

In June, U.S. district judge Indira Talwani blocked this order from being implemented in these states. She found that the President lacked authority to order any changes to the way states administer federal election, and that federal agencies lacked the ability to compile "accurate" citizen lists for every state.

What did the Supreme Court do?

The Supreme Court ruled that the state's legal claims are premature, and they have not suffered any concrete harm.

The court's ruling left open the possibility of a new legal challenge once the federal agencies have finalized how they plan to implement Trump's orders.

The court's decision does not mean, however, that the measures taken by the government in order to implement the orders will be legal. The majority decision said that time will tell. Three liberal justices of the court dissented.

WHAT'S THE IMPACT ON MAIL-IN VOTING?

As another injunction, issued by Talwani last August in a different case that prevents the USPS to implement Trump's orders remains in effect, it is unclear what impact this will have. The Supreme Court's ruling did not change that judicial order.

The USPS published a final rule Friday, despite the court orders, to implement Trump's directive regarding mail-in voting. The rule requires that states provide the USPS with a list of recipients for mail-in ballots, and that all envelopes used to send and receive ballots have unique barcodes. According to the administration, the USPS will check whether envelopes comply with the rules, but it won't be responsible for determining whether voters are eligible to cast ballots.

The rule has already been challenged in court by Judge Talwani.

How did the White House and Democrats react?

California Governor Gavin Newsom is a Democrat who has promised to take further legal action. "The Supreme Court has just allowed the Trump administration to move forward (for the moment) with its plan of disenfranchising voters across the nation. California will "sue AGAIN" to stop these Orwellian laws from being implemented, he stated in a press release.

White House spokesperson Lauren Bis called the decision a victory for election security. "These measures are common sense and protect the security of ballots sent by mail, ensuring that only Americans elect American leaders." Bis stated that this administration would continue to follow the lawful agenda on which President Trump was elected, including the safety and security our elections. (Reporting and editing by Michael Learmonth, Lisa Shumaker, Nate Raymond. Additional reporting by Andrew Chung.

(source: Reuters)