Latest News

Judge blocks Trump's plan to limit mail-in voting

A federal judge blocked the U.S. The Postal Service is not allowed to implement the core 'parts' of a new rule that it adopted at Donald Trump’s request?to tighten voting requirements for mail-in ballots ahead of November congressional elections.

U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani issued a temporary restraining in Boston at the request of Democratic-led States and voting rights groups, after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision on Monday that led to lifting earlier injunctions which blocked Trump's plans for restricting mail-in voting.

This decision prompted a frantic effort by dozens of Democratic State Attorneys General and voting rights organizations, including the League of Women Voters, to renew their legal fight and obtain an order to prevent the USPS enforcing the rule that had been allowed to take affect on Wednesday.

Talwani's restraining orders will remain in effect while she decides whether or not to issue a more-term injunction that would block the rule. The judge is a Democrat President Barack Obama appointee and plans to decide whether or not to block the rule during a hearing on September 3.

According to the rule, all envelopes for outgoing and return mail ballots must have unique barcodes. Under the rule, the USPS may refuse to deliver any ballots that are not compliant with the new standards, or those associated with voters not appearing on the list.

The rule was issued to implement the executive order signed by the Republican President in March. Trump had called for stricter?rules regarding voting by mail after years of calling for tighter 'rules and claiming that his defeat in the 2020 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden resulted from widespread voter fraud.

All 50 states allow some form of mail in voting. 29 of them let voters request to vote that way without stating a reason, and eight conduct their entire elections by mail.

According to the states, USPS processed more than 100 million ballots during the election of 2024. About 30% of voters nationwide cast their ballots via mail.

The new federal restrictions, they say, will disenfranchise voters and burden the states during the weeks leading up to an election by forcing them to purchase new envelopes, equipment and training staff.

Plaintiffs?argue that the USPS lacked the authority to issue this rule?and, by doing so, usurped Congress and the states' authority under the U.S. Constitution in regulating elections. The plaintiffs claim that the rule undermines USPS' neutral role as a mail carrier, and violates federal laws that protect voters' rights.

(source: Reuters)