Latest News

US Court of appeals rejects Trump's bid to implement voting restrictions by mail

On Thursday, a U.S. appellate court refused to allow the administration of President Donald Trump to implement a new U.S. A new rule from the Postal Service would tighten voting requirements for mail-in ballots before November's congressional election. The U.S. Supreme Court is also considering a similar request.

Three judges of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court in Boston have ruled that the new rule adopted by USPS at the Republican president's direction cannot be enforced. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to suspend an injunction issued by a lower court judge last week, which prevented USPS from enforcing a new rule that it adopted on the Republican President's directive.

The fate of that rule will be decided soon by the 6-3 conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court. The administration took a rare move by asking the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the injunction before the 1st Circuit issued a ruling.

The injunction was issued on Friday by Boston-based U.S. district judge Indira Talwani. She is an appointee to Democratic President Barack Obama.

"DISENFRANCHISEMENT of MILLIONS of Voters"

The U.S. Department of Justice asked the 1st Circuit to lift Talwani’s order because the plaintiffs’ case was based on a false premise, that USPS intended to take control of the federal election administration when in fact it was adopting a "modest mail-related regulation."

The three-judge panel made up of all judges appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden said the argument focused on the "trees" while ignoring the forest. The?panel stated that the U.S. Constitution gives the states and Congress the power to regulate elections. Not the executive branch.

The court found no fault with Talwani's conclusion, that allowing this rule to go into effect would "likely result in millions of disenfranchised voters across the nation while providing minimal gains -- if any -- in combating fraud."

USPS and White House did no immediately respond to comments.

The Supreme Court is still deciding the appeal. The court had lifted an injunction Talwani had issued which had prevented?USPS moving forward with its rule before it had been finalized.

USPS released the rule in order to implement the executive order that the Republican President signed in March. Trump had been calling for stricter rules regarding voting by mail, and promoting the false claim that Biden's defeat at the 2020 presidential election was due to widespread voter fraud.

All 50 states allow some form of mail-in voting. 29 states allow voters to request to vote by mail, without stating a reason. Eight other states conduct their entire elections by mail.

All outbound and returned ballot envelopes are required to have unique barcodes.

Under the rule, the USPS may refuse to deliver any ballots that don't meet the new standards, or those associated with voters not listed on the list.

Talwani stopped the USPS rule 'going into effect' after concluding that it would disenfranchise voters and was likely illegal, as well as in violation of U.S. Constitution, which gives the states the power to administer elections.

The U.S. released a whistleblower's statement on 1 September from an anonymous federal employee. Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut claimed that USPS was rushing into implementing a new system hastily designed that could disrupt the delivery during the election.

(source: Reuters)