Latest News

US Court of appeals rejects Trump's bid to implement voting restrictions by mail

On Thursday, a U.S. appellate court refused to permit President Donald Trump’s administration to implement?a new U.S. A new rule from the Postal Service would require more stringent requirements for mail-in voting before November's election. The U.S. Supreme Court is also considering a similar request.

The Boston-based "1st U.S. The Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston declined to stay an injunction that a lower court judge issued last Friday, which prevented USPS from enforcing a new rule it adopted on the Republican President's directive.

The injunction was issued by Boston-based U.S. district judge Indira Talwani. She is an Obama appointee and had been appointed at the request of numerous Democratic-led state governments, voting rights groups, and other interested parties.

The administration before the 1st Circuit ruled had already asked the ?6-3 conservative-majority Supreme Court to intervene and pause Talwani's ruling, after it lifted an earlier injunction she issued that had blocked ?USPS from moving forward with the rule.

USPS released the rule in order to implement the executive order that the Republican President signed in March. Trump had been calling for tighter voting rules by mail after years of calling and claiming widespread voter fraud was the reason why he lost the 2020 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden.

The rule requires that states provide the USPS with "lists" of voters and that all return and outbound ballot envelopes have unique barcodes.

According to the rule, the USPS may refuse to deliver any ballots that don't meet the new standards, or are associated with voters not listed on the list.

Talwani is an Obama appointee who prevented the USPS rule going into effect. He concluded that it would disenfranchise voters and was probably illegal and in violation of the U.S. Constitution which gives the states the power to administer elections.

All 50 states permit some form of mail in voting. 29 states allow voters to request to vote by mail, without giving a reason. Eight other states conduct their entire elections by mail.

The U.S. released a whistleblower report?from a anonymous?federal employee on September 1. Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut claimed that USPS rushed to implement a new system hastily?created that could disrupt the delivery during the election.

The U.S. Department of Justice argued that the rule was legal and that the plaintiffs' claim appeared to be based on an unfounded assumption, namely that USPS intended?to take control of the administration of federal elections.

The USPS said that state election officials will retain the full authority over who can vote by mail and that their role is limited to ensuring envelopes meet its "modest" envelope requirements.

(source: Reuters)