Latest News
-
Families of Air India crash victims sue Honeywell and Boeing
Families of four passengers who died in the crash June 12 crash In a lawsuit, the owner of an Air India Boeing 787-8 said that the accident was caused by allegedly defective fuel switches. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Has said that the accident which killed 260 people does not appear to be caused by him. The lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court on Tuesday blames Honeywell and Boeing, who made the switches, as the cause of the crash that occurred seconds after Flight 171 left Ahmedabad, India, bound for London. Plaintiffs cite a 2018 FAA advisor that suggested, but did no mandate, that operators of various Boeing models, such as the 787, check the locking mechanism on the fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not accidentally be moved. The Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), India Report of preliminary investigation The investigation into the crash found that Air India did not perform the recommended inspections and that maintenance records indicated that the throttle control modules, which include the fuel switches, were replaced on the aircraft involved in the accident in 2019 and in 2023. The report stated that "all applicable airworthiness instructions and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, as well as engine" were adhered to. Honeywell and Boeing both declined to comment. The cockpit recording between the two pilots of the jet suggests that, contrary to previous reports, the captain had cut off the fuel flow to the engines. The lawsuit claims that the switches were placed in an area of the cockpit that was more likely to have been accidentally pushed. This "effectively guaranteed" that normal cockpit activities could lead to inadvertently cutting off fuel. Experts in aviation safety told us that this could not happen. Flip Based on their design and location. This lawsuit is the first to have been filed in the United States regarding the crash. The lawsuit seeks damages that are not specified for the deaths suffered by Naavya Dhirubhai, Kuberbhai, and Babiben, all of whom were passengers. Also, 19 passengers and 12 crew members were killed. One passenger survived. The plaintiffs are Indian or British citizens and reside in India or Britain. The preliminary report of Indian investigators appeared to exonerate Boeing, and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace. However, some family groups have criticized the investigators and press for being too focused on pilots' behavior. Legal experts state that, although most accidents are the result of a variety of factors, lawyers who represent victims' families often target manufacturers as they don't have to face the same limitations on liability as airlines. These strategies may also increase the likelihood of bringing a case in U.S. court, which is widely regarded as being more generous to plaintiffs compared to many foreign courts. Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al is the case at Delaware Superior Court No. N25C-09-145. (Reporting and editing by Les Adler, Marguerita Choy, and Les Adler; Additional reporting in Seattle by Dan Catchpole; Reporting by Jonathan Stempel).
-
Colombia asks UN Aviation Agency for global standards on pet protection on planes
After a series of high-profile incidents in which dogs died on planes, Colombia has asked the U.N. aviation agency to adopt global standards for air transporting pets across borders. The representative of Colombia's ICAO said that the country wants to see the organization, which sets international standards for everything from seatbelts to runways, create rules regarding pets in aircraft. The proposal of the South American country, which is supported by about two dozen countries from Latin America and Europe has been made ahead of ICAO’s triennial meeting that runs from September 23 through October 3. "Colombia talks about this because there have been a few instances in our country that negatively affected the health of pets," Mauricio Koppel, a representative from Colombia for ICAO, said on Tuesday. "We found that ICAO does not have a guide that establishes rules and standards for the proper transport of living beings and pets." ICAO can't impose rules to member states but countries who approve of the agency standards tend to adhere by them. The COVID-19 pandemic and the growing pet ownership have led to a surge in demand for "dog first" flights, such as those offered by BARK Air. Virgin Australia announced Wednesday that it will begin allowing small dogs and cats to travel in the cabin of some domestic flights on October 16th. Some airlines will transport pets in the cargo hold instead of the cabin. However, some breeds such as French bulldogs or pugs may be banned because they are at a higher risk of heatstroke. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, incidents involving injured or deceased animals on airplanes are rare. According to a Colombian ICAO working paper, the increase in pet travel has raised concerns about ventilation and safety containment. In the years 2021 and 2022 there were two cases where dogs died aboard small carriers. Meanwhile, in 2020, the Canadian Kennel Club demanded government reforms after dozens of dogs died on a Ukraine International Airlines flight between Kyiv and Toronto. In 2018, a French Bulldog died in an overhead bin after a United Airlines cabin attendant had ordered its stowing. This incident prompted the United States to pass legislation that prohibits airlines from placing animals in dangerous situations by storing them in overhead compartments. Koppel says that the International Air Transport Association, a lobby group for airlines, has set rules on animal transportation across borders. However, these are not legally binding. Qatar Airways, a Middle Eastern carrier, allows falcons to fly in the cabin. Other countries such as Australia require that dogs and cats be quarantined upon arrival. Koppel stated that there was a gap in the law. IATA stated on Wednesday that their live animal regulations are widely recognized and adopted by regulators around the world as "global benchmarks for safe and humane air transport of animals." The group is in favor of ICAO providing a framework for pet transport to all countries as long as there are no duplications. (Reporting and editing by Jamie Freed in Montreal, Allison Lampert is reporting from Montreal)
-
Families of Air India crash victims sue Honeywell and Boeing
Families of four Air India Flight 171 passengers who were killed in the crash on June 30 blamed Boeing and Honeywell for their negligence, and also a defective fuel cutoff switch, which led to the death of 260 people. Flight 171, which was en route from Ahmedabad to London, crashed on June 12 shortly after it took off. The plaintiffs in a complaint filed Tuesday at the Delaware Superior Court said that the locking mechanism on the switch of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner may have been turned off accidentally or missed, resulting in a loss in fuel supply and the loss of thrust required for takeoff. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration warned in 2018 that disengaged locking mechanism on Boeing aircraft could pose a risk. By placing the switch behind the thrust levers "Boeing effectively ensured that normal cockpit activities could result in an inadvertent cutoff of fuel." The complaint stated. "What did Honeywell, Boeing and other companies do to avoid the inevitable catastrophe?" Nothing." Boeing, located in Arlington, Virginia declined to comment Wednesday. Honeywell of Charlotte, North Carolina did not respond immediately to comment requests. Both companies were incorporated in Delaware. This lawsuit is the first to have been filed in the United States regarding the crash. The lawsuit seeks damages that are not specified for the deaths suffered by Naavya Dhirubhai, Kuberbhai, and Babiben, all of whom were passengers. Also, 19 passengers and 12 crew members were killed. One passenger survived. The plaintiffs are Indian or British citizens and reside in either country. The cause of the crash has not been determined conclusively by investigators from India, Britain and America. According to a preliminary report published by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, the confusion that occurred in the cockpit prior to the crash was described in a July report. Bryan Bedford, administrator of the U.S. FAA in July, also expressed "high confidence" that mechanical problems or an inadvertent move of fuel control components was not the cause. Boeing incurred legal costs and other costs of more than $20 billion from the two fatal crashes of 737 MAX aircraft that occurred in 2018 and 2019 The most popular plane was grounded for more than 20 months. Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al is the case at Delaware Superior Court No. N25C-09-145. (Reporting and editing by Leslie Adler; Additional reporting from Dan Catchpole, Seattle; Additional reporting from Jonathan Stempel).
-
Lilly gains from weight loss pill data to consider a faster approval in the US
Eli Lilly’s bid to get approval for a weight-loss experiment got a boost Wednesday thanks to new clinical trial results. The company also reaffirmed it is too early to assume that the drug will become part of the new U.S. rapid review program. Lilly's stock rose by about half a percent on Wednesday. Orforglipron is a pill that mimics the GLP-1 hormone, which suppresses appetite, and targets the blockbuster tirzepatide injection, sold under brand names Mounjaro or Zepbound. Lilly of Indianapolis has been trying hard to increase its lead over Danish competitor Novo Nordisk in the rapidly growing market for GLP-1 medications. Novo Nordisk was the first to market with GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, both for diabetes. This year it fired its CEO and saw its share price drop by 40% due to increased competition from Lilly. Lilly reported that in a comparison of Novo's Rybelsus, an older GLP-1 drug, orforglipron reduced average blood sugar levels and weight better than Novo Rybelsus. Daniel Barasa said, "The data reinforces our conviction that Eli Lilly will maintain its leadership in the GLP-1 Market." He said that orforglipron, in addition to being superior in terms of efficacy, also offers advantages in terms of dosing convenience. Lilly announced on Tuesday that the full data from another late-stage study of orforglipron showed it helped overweight people to lose about 12 percent of their bodyweight, with a similar safety profile as injected drugs. Evan Seigerman, BMO Capital Markets' analyst, said that the new data gave him "increased confidence" in orforglipron's competitive profile. Lilly, the most valuable drugmaker in the world by market value is expanding its U.S. manufacturing capacity and expanding it internationally to meet the soaring demand of GLP-1 treatments. It's also racing with Novo for an oral version for weight loss. Novo anticipates that the U.S. will make a regulatory decision about its oral obesity drug candidate in later this year. Wall Street analysts suggested that orforglipron might be a good candidate for the new priority voucher of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which shortens review times for therapies that are addressing major public health issues. However, executives at Lilly expressed caution. There is very little information about the national priority voucher available today. "I would not expect that we will submit a national priorit voucher because we don't fully understand what it includes," Patrik Jönsson, the president of Lilly International said in an interview Wednesday. Kenneth Custer is the president of Lilly Cardiometabolic Health. He reiterated the statement made by the company earlier that it was too early to tell how the program could apply to Lilly’s pipeline. Lilly plans to file for orforglipron approval as a treatment for diabetes next year. The drug will be approved for weight loss this year. Jonsson stated that Lilly will file applications for orforglipron approval with regulatory agencies in the United States of America, Britain, European Union (EU), Japan, and China within "weeks" of one another. He refused to disclose the exact location of manufacturing for pills outside the U.S. but confirmed that non-U.S. manufacture is planned. Analysts predict that the drug will generate sales of up to $10 billion in its peak year. Reporting by Maggie Fick and Sriparna Roy. Additional reporting by Deena B. Beasley, Los Angeles. Mark Potter, Sharon Singleton and David Gregorio edited the story.
-
Urals diffs unchanged, loading plans revision awaited
The differential between Brent and Urals crudes dated on Wednesday remained unchanged, as traders awaited any changes to the grade's September export plans. This is because Russian ports and refineries are still repairing after recent drone attacks in Ukraine. Traders said that oil loadings at Baltic Primorsk continued, but they were delayed several days. Some volumes may be diverted to another port. Kazmunaygaz, the state energy company, announced on Wednesday that Kazakhstan will resume oil supply via the Baku - Tbilisi - Ceyhan pipeline by September 13. PLATTS WINDOW On Wednesday, there were no bids or offers made on Urals, Azeri BTC Blend or CPC blend in the Platts Window. Poland's Energy Minister Milosz Motyka announced on Wednesday that it will help member states of the European Union that still import Russian energy by 2026. RIA reported that Sergei Ryabkov, the Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, said on Wednesday, Moscow is ready to intensify discussions with the U.S. about energy cooperation, which includes the Sakhalin 1 Project. (Reporting and Editing by Kirsten Doovan)
-
Poland calls on the EU to stop Russian oil imports before 2026, citing risks geopolitical
Poland's Energy Minister Milosz Motyka stated on Wednesday that Poland will help member states of the European Union who are still importing Russian energy by 2026. The Druzhba pipeline transports Russian oil to Hungary, Slovakia and other EU countries that have cut off ties with Russia following the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine 2022. After a phone call with U.S. president Donald Trump, EU executive director Ursula von der Leyen announced on Tuesday that the European Commission would propose a faster phase-out of Russian fossil fuel imports. The bloc had planned to stop buying Russian oil and gas on January 1, 2028. The Polish Minister said that this should have happened two years earlier. This is especially true in light of recent events, such as the Russian drone incursion last week on Polish territory. Motyka's letter to the EU energy ministers urged them to reach a consensus on a goal to eliminate all imports of Russian crude by 2026. This decision would demonstrate our commitment to becoming independent of oil supplies that pose political and strategic risk. Due to the opposition of Slovakia and Hungary who receive Russian pipeline supplies, and maintain close ties with Moscow, the EU has imposed sanctions against most Russian oil imports. Slovakia and Hungary have defended the purchases they made, stating that alternatives were more expensive, such as transit fees when oil is transported via Croatia. Denisa Sakova, the Slovak Economy minister, said that she discussed with U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright on Wednesday her call to stop Russian supplies and explained how Slovakia needs conditions for diversification so as not to cut off its industry or economy. "We diversify gas supplies, and we want to diversify further in the future." We have to rely upon the transmission capacity of other routes", she added, adding that the situation with oil was similar and left Slovakia at the mercy of other countries. Wojciech Wrochna, deputy to Motyka and Poland's chief energy security official, said that U.S. gas liquefied via Poland can help eliminate Russian gas in Europe. Wrochna, a reporter, said: "I had an excellent meeting yesterday with U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright. U.S. Gas flowing south via Poland can help eliminate Russian gas." Orlen, a Polish company, began shipping U.S. Gas to Ukraine in the spring of this year to replenish Kyiv's stores before winter. Slovakia is still reliant upon Russian imports, and has not taken advantage of a gas connection with Poland to secure alternate supplies. (Reporting by Marek Strzelecki. Writing by Anna Wlodarczak-Semczuk. Mark Potter, Ed Osmond and Anna Wlodarczak-Semczuk edited the book.
-
Italy's privacy watchdog stops facial recognition at Milan Airport
Documents revealed on Wednesday that the privacy watchdog in Italy has temporarily suspended facial recognition technology from being used at Milan's Linate Airport pending the completion of a lengthy data protection investigation. Concerns about possible misuse of passenger data have been raised by airport facial recognition screenings. The Privacy Watchdog in Italy (known as Garante) justified the suspension of the facial recognition system by stating that there were not enough safeguards in place at Linate in order to prevent the use of the technology on passengers who hadn't signed up for it. The decision, dated 11 September, was made public by the government on Wednesday. The website of Milan airports operator SEA claims that its "Faceboarding technology" is "safe, easy and fast". It allows passengers to pass through security checks without having to show their passports or ID cards. SEA responded to Garante’s action on Wednesday by stating that it complies to current regulations, and is working with the watchdog in order to clarify every aspect of data processing. The company said that it would like to restart the facial recognition service as soon as it can, but only for adult passengers. It added that it improves airport security, and speeds up procedures.
-
UN Aviation Assembly: Global emissions deal is a top priority for airlines
The head of the trade association IATA told journalists on Wednesday that a global emissions agreement is crucial for airlines before a U.N. Aviation gathering next week. Despite skepticism about the industry's ability to meet its own environmental goals, the chief of the trade body IATA said. In 2016, the U.N. CORSIA agreement was signed to limit rising emissions on international flights by requiring airlines to purchase carbon credits and using green jet fuel. IATA, however, has questioned the U.N.'s goal to achieve a 5% decrease in industry emissions by 2020 due to a lack of credits and fuel made from used cooking oil. Even though the Trump administration does not prioritize environmental protection, reducing plane pollution remains a goal. Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air Transport Association, said: "I believe that changing geopolitical environments may have a short-term effect on how people perceive these issues." The vast majority of industry players have consistently told us that they understand that the industry has a role to play. The triennial meeting of the International Civil Aviation Organization, which takes place from September 23 to October 3 this year, will see regulators from 193 nations discuss topics such as the environment, the raising of the retirement age for pilots from 65 to 67, and safety concerns regarding radio frequency interference from the Global Navigation Satellite System in certain parts Europe. The countries will decide if Russia receives enough votes to be re-elected to the 36-member ICAO council in 2022 after it failed to gain enough support following its invasion of Ukraine. Walsh said that the Trump administration was "quite correct" in dropping a proposal by former president Joe Biden, which would have required airlines to compensate passengers for flight disruptions caused by them. He said that the recent Trump Administration order to terminate a joint venture between Delta Air Lines, Aeromexico, and United States concerns about Mexico's violation of bilateral air agreements was "a natural progression of geopolitical matters." The Department of Transportation claims that Mexico has violated an air agreement bilaterally by cutting slots for passenger flights, and forcing all cargo carriers to relocate their operations. Walsh warned that joint ventures between airlines, which allow them to coordinate pricing, scheduling and capacity decisions, can improve service for consumers. He said, "I believe we have to separate the consumer impact from the political impact" of these joint ventures.
US lawmakers ask Trump to reinstate the delay compensation program for air travelers
A group of 77 House Democrats on Wednesday urged President Donald Trump's administration to reinstate the plan that his predecessor championed to compensate U.S. passengers for airline delays.
The Transportation Department announced on September 4 that it would not follow a proposal by the then Democratic president Joe Biden, which required airlines to compensate passengers in cash when carriers cause flight disruptions within the United States.
The lawmakers, led by Democratic Representatives Greg Stanton, and Rick Larsen, said that the Trump administration, instead of rolling back passenger protections, should focus on bipartisan, common-sense ways to lower costs for customers while maintaining the safety of our skies. This decision will increase the cost of traveling and undermine consumer protections.
USDOT, under Biden's leadership, asked for public comments in December on whether airlines should have to pay between $200 and $775 per delay. The U.S. airline industry has strongly criticized Biden's proposal from 2023.
Sean Duffy's spokesperson said that the best way to end endless delays was to fix the broken air traffic system. He also criticized how the previous administration handled the issue.
USDOT stated that it will implement the consumer protection mandates of Congress to "ensure that travelers are treated fairly, while also acknowledging how excessive regulations can raise ticket prices."
In the U.S., airlines must reimburse passengers for cancelled flights if they choose to not fly. However, they are not required compensate customers for delayed flights.
All four countries - the European Union, Canada and Britain - have rules on airline delays compensation.
Airlines for America, the trade group that represents American Airlines Delta Air Lines United Airlines Southwest Airlines and other airlines, stated Wednesday, "the entire business model of airlines is based on repeat, satisfied customers." In this highly competitive market, carriers do not need any additional incentives to provide quality services.
In 2022, major U.S. airlines will pay for meals, hotels, and other expenses if flight delays are significant.
USDOT has also revealed this month that it is considering revoking regulations that were issued under Biden, which required airlines to disclose fees along with airfare. It will also be writing new rules that define a cancellation of flight that allows consumers to receive a refund. (Reporting and editing by Chris Reese, Aurora Ellis, and David Shepardson)
(source: Reuters)