Latest News
-
Finland suspects four persons in breach of subsea cables
The Finnish police, who are investigating the damage done to two subsea cables in the Baltic Sea last year, said that four people were suspected of a crime. Prosecutors will decide whether or not charges should be brought. Finland has seized a cargo ship, Fitburg, on December 31, 'while it was en route to Israel from Russia. They suspected that the cables from Helsinki to Estonia across the Gulf of Finland had been damaged. This is one of many incidents of this nature in recent years. The police?on Saturday said that they had investigated suspected aggravated crimes, attempted aggravated crimes, and aggravated interferences with telecommunications. They were referring the case to prosecutors in order to determine if any charges should be filed. The police said in a press release that the investigation had concluded with four suspects. Three of them remain under a travel restriction. After a series of power outages, telecommunications failures, and gas pipeline disruptions since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the Baltic Sea region has been on high alert. NATO has increased its military presence by adding aircraft, frigates, and naval drones. (Reporting and editing by Terje Solsvik, Essi Lehto)
-
Norway opposes tariffs and rejects US claims about forced labour
Norway's foreign minister has rejected a U.S. assessment that the Nordic country?failed? to prevent forced labor, adding?that?the allegation?was unfounded?and shouldn?t be used?by President Donald Trump?to justify new tariffs. The Trump administration proposed Tuesday tariffs of up to 12.5% on imported goods from 60 countries including Norway after concluding that they failed to curb the?trade in products made with forced labor, an assertion that many U.S. trading partners rejected. In a statement issued late on Thursday, Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide stated that "we strongly disagree" with the U.S. authorities' assessment of Norway not doing enough to stop forced labour. The Transparency Act was the first legislation in the world to prevent forced labour from being used to supply chains. Barth Eide said that he had told the U.S. authorities about this. Experts, business groups, and some human right groups say that Trump's threat to slap new tariffs on trading partners will not do much to combat?modern slave trade -- and may even make matters worse. (Reporting and editing by Terje Solsvik, Jagoda Darlandak)
-
Argentina recommends awarding the dredging contract to Jan de Nul, and local partners, despite US concerns
The Economy Ministry announced that the Argentine government had recommended awarding an important?dredging contract in Argentina to Belgian dredging firm Jan De Nul, and its local partner Servimagnus. Rep. Brian Mast, chairman of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, warned in May about the "malign influence" of China in the bid to win the major contract for Argentina. Jan De Nul, and its local partner Servimagnus, denied any Chinese ties. * The recommendation is for the concession to dredge the Parana River and maintain it, as this river carries 80%?of?the trade of the country. In a late-Thursday statement, the ministry recommended that DEME, a Belgian competitor company, be rejected. *?Jan de Nul - Servimagnus? scored 66.20 in the technical evaluation stage, compared to 42.14 points for DEME. The statement said that both firms had submitted identical tariffs and received the maximum score for the economic component. DTA Engenharia, a Brazilian company, was declared inadmissible after failing to provide the required bid-maintenance guarantees. Before a final?award, a seven-day period has been opened for formal 'challenges' to the recommendation. The ministry added: * "The awarding of the contract will end the process and bring an end to the deadlock in the construction work on the waterway." * The waterway is a 3,400-kilometer natural river transport route that runs along the Parana River and the Paraguay River. It's essential for importing soybeans to Argentina, which are used in the production of oil, meal and other products.
-
UAE markets benefit despite the stalled US/Iran peace talks
The stock markets of 'the United Arab Emirates' closed higher on Friday. Dubai outperformed its regional peers despite the fading hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough between Israel and the U.S. Hezbollah, a militia backed by Iran, rejected a ceasefire on Thursday in?Lebanon and Israel announced it?wouldn't withdraw troops from the?country?undermining U.S. president Donald Trump's attempts to halt fighting?and achieve a peace?deal? with Tehran. Dubai's main index of shares rose by 0.9%, boosted by gains in the industrial and utilities sectors. Salik Company, a toll operator, increased by 1.6% while Emirates Central Cooling Systems grew 2.5%. Abu Dhabi's benchmark indices settled 0.3% higher, with the largest utility company Abu?Dhabi?National?Energy rising 6.2%. Alef Education's stock rose 1% following the?full migration to Microsoft Azure of its digital learning ecosystem with Core42's sovereign cloud capability. Brent crude was down?0.32% to $94.73 per barrel at 1232 GMT. (Reporting from Mohd. Edrees, Bengaluru. Editing by Shailesh. Kuber.)
-
Pentagon: US forces board a sanctioned oil tanker in the Indian Ocean
The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command announced on Friday that U.S. forces had seized the stateless sanctioned oil tanker Davina in the Indian Ocean overnight. Washington has placed a sea blockade against Iran, while Tehran has fired at ships to stop them from?sailing? through the Strait of Hormuz and entering the Middle East Gulf. In recent months, U.S. forces intercepted "multiple commercial and petroleum tankers" in the Indian Ocean. Indo-Pacific Command posted on X that "we will continue to enforce global maritime law to?disrupt illegal networks and 'interdict vessels providing materials support to Iran wherever they operate". According to data from ship tracking, the Davina is a supertanker that can carry up to 2 million barrels of crude oil. The U.S. placed sanctions on it in October 2024 because it was involved in?oil trade with Iran. Ship tracking data on MarineTraffic showed that the vessel, also known as the Lenore was last spotted on June 5, off the southern coast of Sri Lanka. Separate shipping data revealed that the vessel's?draft indicated it was almost fully?laden with an oil cargo. (Reporting and editing by Doina chiacu and Joe Bavier; Reporting and Editing by Susan Heavey, Jonathan Saul)
-
Swedish court orders that seized cargo ships can be transferred to Ukraine
A Swedish court ruled on Monday that the seizure of an unidentified cargo ship in 'the Baltic Sea' was legal and that it could be sent to Ukraine where it is suspected of transporting grain illegally from Russian-occupied territory. The Swedish coast guard and police seized the Caffa in March off the southern Swedish coast, claiming it was operating under a false banner and had violated maritime and ship safety laws because of its lack of seaworthiness. According to the ruling of June 4, a lawyer for the owner Caffa Shipping Limited had challenged the seizure, and asked for the vessel's?release. The court stated that Ukraine was seeking the ship in connection with an investigation of suspected war crimes, including the removal and appropriation of property from Russian-occupied territories. Hakan Larsson, public prosecutor, said that in an email to?, "the court confirmed that the seizure was legal and that the vessel could be handed over to Ukraine." The district court ruled that the alleged conduct may constitute a crime of war under Swedish law. This cleared the way for the vessel to be transferred and the evidence it contained to the Ukrainian authorities. Larsson stated that the decision must be legally binding before any transfer of ownership can occur, and added?that owners have three week to appeal. The lawyer for Caffa?Shipping did not respond immediately to a further comment request. The police reported that the majority of the 11 crew members of the 'Caffa were Russians at the time of the seizure. According to the ship tracking service MarineTraffic, the vessel is a general cargo ship measuring 96 metres. Reporting by Jagoda darlak. Terje Solsvik, Mark Potter and Terje Slsvik edited the article.
-
Greek shipping magnate: The West needs to speed up the scrapping of its shadow fleet, as dangers grow.
Western governments should accelerate the scrapping of unregulated vessels that have been sanctioned and give their operators time to dispose of them, as environmental risks are increasing daily. In recent years, the?use of so-called'shadow?fleets?or dark fleets of tankers has increased. Hundreds of tankers are transporting Iranian and Russian oil without any safety or insurance checks. Evangelos Marinakis is the founder and chairman at Greece's Capital Maritime & Trading Corp., a major ship owner with more than 285 vessels on order. He has been pushing to remove unregulated tankers in global trading. Marinakis said during the Posidonia Shipping Week in Athens that "we face environmental risks every day from dark fleet ships". He said, "We should allow dark-fleet vessels to be scrapped both in the United States of America and the European Union." Marinakis addressed the concern that proceeds from the disposal of ships would go to 'potentially sanctioned parties.' He said:?these typically amount to less profit than a single trip and scrapping would reduce the massive profits made by the shadow fleet. GMS, a leading ship recycling company based in Dubai, announced last month that it had received approval from the U.S. Government to scrap four containers ships which were subject to Iran-related sanctions. However, their seller wasn't affected by the sanctions. Marinakis stated that his group has been in contact with Washington and sent "a great deal of useful material". Marinakis declined to comment further and the U.S. Treasury didn't respond to an?ask for comment. The shipowner - who also owns the Olympiacos soccer team and Nottingham Forest soccer team - said that shadow fleet operators must be allowed to dispose of their ships in a certain time frame. Marinakis stated that if we gave them four to five months for the scrapping schedule, we would see a reduction of at least 20%-25% in "the dark fleet". He said that ship recyclers should be allowed to pay?dollars or?euros to the owners of dark fleets they are scrapping. But only for scrapping. "This is the way forward." (Reporting and additional reporting by Timothy Gardner, Editing by Tomasz Janowowski)
-
Maguire: Key reasons why Trump’s efforts to save the US coal industry may fail.
The U.S. president's efforts to revive coal in the United States tap into a powerful mix of energy security, industrial policy, and electoral politics. The data shows that structural factors are driving coal's decline. Even if the government directs tens or hundreds of millions to coal producers and utilities the result will be a misallocation, increased emissions, and higher electricity costs. There are four reasons that efforts to support coal could ultimately fail. 1. ECONOMICS ARE STUBBORNLY UNFAVORABLE This could be a bad idea: subsidizing coal runs counter to the fundamentals of the market, leaving taxpayers with an uncompetitive sector while driving up electricity costs. The share of coal in the U.S. electric generation fell from 60% in 2000 to 16% by 2025. Natural gas has become more popular, cheaper and easier to transport. The market tells a different story. Since the early 2000s, no U.S. utilities have attempted to build any new coal-fired plants. During the same time period, many gas-fired power plants were built, reflecting a much stronger economics as well as operational advantages. The difference is apparent in the levelized costs of energy. Lazard data shows that the cost of power from a coal plant is approximately $115 per megawatt-hour (MWh), while a gas plant costs about $64/MWh. When utilities are focused on minimizing customer costs, they have little incentive to select coal. The economics of existing coal plants are even worse due to their age, high maintenance costs and inefficiency. Government subsidies are able to prolong the operation of coal plants, but only by extending their life. 2. CONSTRUCTION COMPLEX AND RISKY This could be a bad idea: Because coal plants are slower and harder to build, they're more likely to experience delays and overruns in cost even with government support. Construction of modern combined-cycle gas turbines (CCGT) is relatively simple and quick. In contrast, coal plants require large boilers, fuel handling systems and specialized infrastructure. Gas plants can burn fuel without any preprocessing. Coal plants must handle large volumes of solid fuels, which require transport, crushing and storage yards. They also need elaborate combustion systems. These systems also require expensive emissions-control technology and ash disposal system, which adds to capital costs and regulatory complexity. The land requirements are also typically larger. The industry has lost a lot of knowledge. Few utilities or contractors are familiar with building coal-fired plants after decades of focusing on gas. The resulting?execution risk increases the possibility of unexpected costs and delays. These factors together make coal projects more costly, slower and less predictable. This is true even when the environment is favorable. 3. LOGISTICAL BURDENS The heavy transport and handling of coal can cause local opposition and increase costs. Gas is much easier to transport than coal. Gas can be transported continuously and cheaply via pipelines, while coal is hauled either by rail, truck or barge. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), approximately 1.14 pounds coal is needed to produce one kilowatt hour of electricity. One gigawatt of coal can be used to generate around 9,000 metric tonnes of coal each day. This is the equivalent of 90 freight cars in a freight train. A gas plant of the same size, on the other hand, would consume approximately 170 million cubic foot of natural gas per day, a volume which can be easily pumped through existing infrastructure. In order to expand coal power, it would be necessary not only to build new plants, but also make significant investments in storage, handling, and rail systems. These extra requirements increase costs and can create bottlenecks. Local challenges are also posed by these projects. The increased rail traffic, noise and dust can cause opposition in communities. This makes it harder for projects to be approved and sustained. The coal industry's competitiveness is further undermined by these logistical and social constraints. 4. Limited Export Upside This could be a disaster: Key overseas markets may not export coal because they produce it themselves or are moving away from it. The coal revival strategy includes a boost in export capacity. This could include proposals for a "gateway" linking Wyoming production with ports on the U.S. West Coast that are aimed at supplying Asia. Asia dominates the global coal industry. China, India and Indonesia account for collectively more than 80% global coal supply. This region is also the leader in coal exports, which indicates a structural preference for supplying coal rather than importing it. ?U.S. While?U.S. India is heavily dependent on coal and investing in alternative sources of energy. If demand does not materialize, then large-scale infrastructure for export could be underutilized or stranded. Projects backed by the public could generate limited returns and lock in significant upfront costs. COAL CRUX These factors, when taken together, point out a fundamental mismatch in policy ambition and economic reality. Government intervention can slow down coal's decline on the margins but it cannot change the structural forces which have made it less attractive than alternatives. Subsidies instead risk prolonging the life of an aging infrastructure and encouraging expensive new projects that have uncertain returns. They also support export strategies which are unlikely to be sustained over time. What appears politically appealing in the short-term could prove to be economically counterproductive. These are the opinions of the columnist, an author for. You like this column? Check out Open Interest, your new essential source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, X and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets 7 days a weeks.
Brokers bet on winners of various sectors as the World Cup soccer tournament kicks off
Analysts predict that the 2026 FIFA World Cup in host countries will bring billions of dollars to their economies. This will be driven by an unprecedented surge in consumption, which will boost sectors as diverse as retail, athletic wear and tourism.
The tournament is set to be held from?June 11, to July 19, and will be the biggest soccer event in history. It could drive consumer spending during a period when broader demand is fragile.
According to FIFA's analysis of the socioeconomic impact, which was conducted in conjunction with the World Trade Organization (WTO), the first three-nation World Cup (WC), which includes the United States, Canada, and Mexico, is expected to bolster the global GDP by approximately $41 billion.
Here are the stocks and sectors that brokerages believe will benefit from this once every four years event:
HOTEL OPERATORS
B. Riley estimates that a total 13.1 million World Cup visitors, including both ticketed and unticketed attendees generated 21.3 million hotel room nights across all online travel platforms.
Analysts say that U.S. hotel chains Marriott, Hilton, and Hyatt, as well as the online travel platforms Airbnb and Booking Holdings, as well as Expedia, are likely to benefit from this event.
Marriott expects World Cup momentum to continue into the third quarter. Airbnb predicts that hosts in New York, New Jersey and Boston will earn the most money during the World Cup.
Airline Tickets
Goldman Sachs thinks WC could have a?net positive' effect on U.S. Airlines.
Goldman stated that "June tends to be a lower season for inbound leisure travel and corporate travel, while a significant portion of the peak outbound travel season occurs after the WC has ended."
The war in Iran has caused a sharp increase in the price of jet fuel, forcing U.S. airlines to raise fares, which is causing budget-conscious Americans delay or cancel their summer vacations.
BEER STOCKS
Jefferies estimates that more than 1 billion pints will be consumed worldwide during the holiday season. This represents a 0.3% increase in?volumes for the industry. Markets such as the U.S.A., Mexico and Brazil are expected to improve.
Analysts at Jefferies said that after five years of volatile beer prices, the market should improve in 2026.
The timing of the tournament is also a plus. Roughly 75% of matches will be played in the U.S. while 84% of the matches involving participating countries are in the beer-drinking-friendly time zones, the analysts added.
Bernstein, Goldman and Jefferies believe that Corona beer maker Anheuser-Busch InBev will be the main beneficiary. Anheuser-Busch InBev is the official beer sponsor of the WC. Heineken, world's second largest brewer, will also benefit from the exposure it has in Latin America and Europe.
US RETAIL AND 'SPORTSWEAR
Goldman predicts that a surge of merchandise demand by fans will push sales up at Dick's Sporting Goods, and Academy Sports.
Analysts said that sportswear brands like Adidas, Puma, and Nike could benefit from increased brand exposure and marketing during the World Cup.
Goldman pointed out that Adidas, the official sponsor of match balls, has sponsorship deals with multiple teams. This allows it to gain global exposure at the event.
FOOD, RESTAURANTS, AND DELIVERY
Citi said that traditional?grocers like Albertsons and Kroger as well as larger retailers such Walmart and Target are likely to benefit during the World Cup from increased household spending.
Tourism and group viewings are expected to support a rise in restaurant demand. This could lift McDonald's Pizzas, Domino's Pizzas, Wingstops, and Chipotles, as well as food distributors like Performance Food Group, US Foods, and Sysco.
MEDIA AND DIGITAL ?PLATFORMS
Deutsche Bank analysts stated that they expect the men's World Cup in 2026 to generate the largest US advertising revenues ever.
Morgan Stanley estimated that the tournament would generate between $300 and $400 million in advertising revenue to Fox, the broadcaster of the English-language rights. Deutsche Bank pointed out that Comcast's?Telemundo which holds the Spanish-language broadcast rights is another potential beneficiary.
Citi stated that internet companies like?Alphabet?s YouTube and Meta Platforms?s Instagram could benefit from an increase in user activity.
BETTING OPERATORS
The World Cup is expected to increase overall betting volumes, and Deutsche Bank expects Flutter Entertainment to outperform DraftKings.
Macquarie predicted that global wagers would exceed $50 billion, or nearly $0.5 billion each match. This is compared to the 35 billion dollars for the previous tournament in 2022.
(source: Reuters)