Latest News

Documents show that India has rebuked its aviation watchdog for lapses in conflict of interest.

The Indian aviation safety regulator has been reprimanded for not being vigilant enough to protect 'against officials who use their influence to help family get jobs in the industry and for failing to disclose such placements. Government documents examined by show.

Documents show that India's Ministry of Civil Aviation, since mid-2025, has repeatedly challenged the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, its safety body for handling conflicts involving relatives of officials in airlines. One instance involved Air India.

The concerns are at a crucial time for the DGCA, which oversees one the fastest growing aviation markets in the world. It also faces staffing shortages following a year of increased scrutiny after an Air India Dreamliner accident, safety lapses by the airline, and disruptions at IndiGo, the country's biggest carrier.

The DGCA also has to deal with a federal investigation into a bribery accusation against one of their officers. They are due in a few months to go through a routine U.S. - Federal Aviation Administration safety audit.

In a document reviewed in January by the Ministry, the concerns expressed about the regulator's handling conflict of interest were summarized.

It said that "(the) DGCA was not able to prevent or effectively manage the possible 'influence exercised by their officials in the recruiting or placing of their family members or dependents."

The documents did NOT indicate if the Ministry planned to take further action.

One document showed that 51 DGCA officials had revealed 59 relatives who worked in the industry as of January 31, this is up from 33 officials who disclosed 41 relatives one year ago.

Some relatives were employed by IndiGo, Air India Akasa Air and Airbus India as well as some flying schools and airport operators.

Requests for comment from the ministry, DGCA, and companies that employed the relatives were not answered.

Disclosures and approval

Indian regulations prohibit federal employees from using?influence or their position to secure jobs for relatives and require disclosures?and approvals. In India, conflict-of-interest issues have been raised in the public sector before, including by the DGCA where four officers received a censure in 2013.

A senior official who has direct knowledge of this matter said that the civil aviation ministry is concerned about "potential regulatory influence", as DGCA officials could withhold information on relatives' employment with airlines they supervise and soften regulatory oversight.

The official declined to name himself due to the sensitive nature of the issue. He cited an example in which a DGCA officer had around 12 relatives working in the industry, but that the ministry learned only after the officer retired.

Faiz Kidwai, the then-DGCA chief, requested more power last year on'several administrative issues'. This included authority to deal with potential conflict of interest cases internally. In a letter dated July 2025, he argued that the approval process of the ministry led to "administrative delay" and that decisions should be made more quickly.

The Ministry rejected the request and said that the DGCA "continued expressions of inability to assign responsibility for delays or lack?approval have been alarming," according to the document from January.

Kidwai did not reply to a comment request. He is now working for the Department of Personnel & Training in India.

AIR INDIA HIRES OFFICIAL’S SISTER

Documents show that a DGCA assistant 'director of engineering' was questioned about an apparent conflict of interests after his sister was hired by Air India as a quality manager while he was involved with granting regulatory approvals affecting Air India.

The DGCA argued that his sister is an independent widow, and that the rule requiring approval only covered dependents such as sons and daughters. However, it stated that he would not handle Air India issues out of precaution.

In a document dated August 2025, the Aviation Ministry rejected the DGCA proposal to approve this case.

"Influence/involvement of officer can't be ?ruled out ... The transparency and legitimacy of the appointment process remain ambiguous."

The U.S. Ethics rules require that officials refrain from taking part in matters where their impartiality could be questioned by family relationships, whereas the European aviation regulator may ask for declarations of interests and restrict staff duties.

Harsh Vardhanpratap Singh, President of the Association of Flying Training Organisations said that the DGCA could publish a list of all officers whose family members work in the industry it regulates.

He said that transparency in the declarations of officers is crucial to achieving safety. (Reporting and editing by Adityakalra, Jamie Freed and Abhijith Gaapavaram)

(source: Reuters)