Latest News

Trump's attack on offshore wind has a knock-on effect for US shipbuilders and ports

Shipbuilders and port operators in the United States are suffering from the fallout of President Donald Trump’s campaign to eliminate the offshore wind industry. They have lost hundreds of millions in government support and seen their vessel orders disappear. Their investments worth billions of dollar's now face an uncertain future.

This is an unintended result of Trump's offshore wind policy, which includes stop-work orders for large projects and permit reviews that were sparked by former president Joe Biden’s green investment policies.

Trump says offshore wind is an ugly and inefficient technology which harms birds and whales. He is a strong supporter of U.S. marine industries, which he sees as vital in the global race for trade dominance and military dominance on the high seas.

Joe Orgeron is a Republican Louisiana State Representative and former owner of an offshore vessel company. He said that the offshore wind industry had been responsible for many ship purchases in recent years. "Unfortunately, that all came to an abrupt halt."

The details are revealed here for the very first time.

The Department of Transportation has canceled more than 679 million dollars in funding for ports that support offshore wind. This includes a grant of $34 million for an installation in Salem Massachusetts, which was supposed to generate 75 million dollars in tax revenue in 20 years and 800 jobs.

According to Oceantic, the trade group, orders for new offshore service vessels, designed to transport workers and enormous turbines offshore, or to lay underwater cable, have also vanished. This follows a busy year in 2024, which saw at least ten U.S. vessels launched to serve offshore winds.

According to the report, existing vessels are being sold or redeployed to other regions around the world.

Trump's administration has said that it can revitalize the U.S. port and shipbuilding industry without offshore wind support. The industry had suffered for years from cost inflation and a lack of government support.

The U.S. Department of Transportation stated that "this administration will restore America’s maritime dominance" by modernizing ports and expanding shipbuilding capabilities to compete with communist China.

We're doing it quickly and as cost-effectively possible - two attributes that are completely absent from offshore wind manufacturing."

BIG CANCELLATION Danish shipping company Maersk cancelled a $475-million contract for a ship custom designed to install massive wind turbines on the Empire Wind Power Project off the coast of New York earlier this month, revealing the decline in vessel demand.

Empire Wind, a project of Equinor, was embroiled earlier this year in Trump's opposition against offshore wind when the administration issued an order to stop work that delayed construction for one month.

Seatrium in Singapore, the shipbuilder, was said to be evaluating options for the vessel which was almost completed and that it could take legal actions.

According to Oceantic Network, the growth of offshore wind in the Northeast has fueled a strong demand for such vessels. This includes several that were built in U.S. yards or flown under U.S. national flags. The group said that the offshore wind sector has benefited from $5.1 billion worth of port investments, and $1.8 billion worth of vessel orders.

Among these vessels is the 715 million dollar Charybdis. It is the only vessel with a U.S. flag that is used to install wind turbines. This vessel is currently working for Dominion Energy on its Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Project.

Edison Chouest, a Louisiana-based company, also built two large offshore worker housing vessels for Equinor's and Orsted's projects that are currently being constructed.

The work has dried up.

US Wind, an offshore wind developer, said in court documents that were filed this month that it was on track to obtain specialized vessels for the installation of offshore wind. However, efforts by the Trump administration to stop their Maryland project disrupted those plans.

The company stated that such vessels are rare and often booked many years in advance. This means early action is needed to meet the construction deadlines.

Blount Boats of Rhode Island, which started building crew transfer boats for offshore wind energy in 2016, has stopped production completely.

Julie Blount, Executive Vice President, said: "We have moved on." There are no contracts on those boats because the Trump Administration has shut that down.

Some existing offshore wind vessels are also being sold.

Houston-based Seacor Marine said in August that it would sell to Nigerian oil-and-gas services company JAD Construction two liftboats with U.S. flags, used at the Block Island offshore wind farm and South Fork offshore turbine farms. The company cited delays and cancellations as reasons for its decision.

Seacor has not responded to a comment request.

Other ships are facing uncertain futures. Bill Hanson, of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp., stated that the $200 million Acadia - America's first ship for rock installation - will work overseas once it has completed jobs for Equinor or Orsted.

The company does not plan to build any more offshore wind vessels.

Ports Reeling Too

Oceanic estimated that last year, more than twenty U.S. port cities were involved in offshore wind projects. The DOT canceled grants totaling $679 million worth of funding in August. This affected projects in Massachusetts, New York and California as well as Maryland and Virginia.

Salem's port project, which is suffering after funding was cancelled, is in trouble.

According to Chris Mikkelsen, Executive Director of the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District, in Northern California, it is anticipated that the Humboldt Bay Offshore Wind Port, which lost $426.7 Million - the majority of the canceled DOT funds - will be delayed for at least five years, to 2035.

The project hopes to use funds from the state climate bond in order to compensate for lost federal funding.

Norfolk, Virginia economic development officials said that the developer of a marine logistic terminal, which lost a $39m DOT grant, submitted a revised project proposal refocusing it away from offshore winds to align the project with the administration's priority.

Some port projects continue to be undertaken. According to a spokesperson for Equinor, the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal that will support its Empire Wind Project is 70% completed and has employed approximately 3,000 workers.

US Wind in Maryland says that it will continue to build a steel manufacturing facility on the shore that would serve shipbuilding and energy industries, despite the cancellation of the $47.4m port grant as well as the plans by the administration to revoke its permit for offshore wind. US Wind also warned that it might face bankruptcy if the project was canceled in court documents.

Jim Strong, of the United Steelworkers, which has an agreement to supply workers for US Wind’s facility, expressed optimism that Trump will see how offshore wind investments can have a ripple effect on industries that are important to him.

Strong, speaking of Trump, said that Trump had shown a great deal of passion when he spoke about steel during his campaign. I want to believe there will be a shift in positions once the story has been told. (Additional reporting from Lisa Baertlein, Los Angeles; Editing done by Richard Valdmanis & Marguerita Choy).

(source: Reuters)