Latest News

United States Supreme Court blocks EPA's 'Excellent Neighbor' air pollution strategy

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday obstructed an Environmental Protection Agency guideline targeted at minimizing ozone emissions that may aggravate air pollution in neighboring states, handing a victory to 3 Republicanled states and the steel and fossilfuel markets that had challenged the guideline.

The 5-4 decision given requests by Ohio, Indiana and West Virginia, along with U.S. Steel Corp, pipeline operator Kinder Morgan and market groups, to halt enforcement of the EPA's Good Neighbor strategy limiting ozone contamination from upwind states, while they object to the rule's legality in a. lower court.

The EPA provided the rule in March 2023 intending to target. gases that form ozone, an essential part of smog, from power. plants and other commercial sources in 23 upwind states whose. own plans did not satisfy the Good Neighbor arrangement of the. Clean Air Act anti-pollution law, requiring actions to lower. contamination that drifts into states downwind.

The firm said the rule would result in cleaner air for. countless individuals, conserving countless lives.

Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the. ruling, stated the court is granting the challengers' demand. because they are most likely to ultimately prevail in the litigation,. because the FDA did not fairly describe its actions.

Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented, joined by. the court's three liberal justices.

The court today advises the enforcement of a major. Environmental Protection Agency guideline based on an underdeveloped. theory that is not likely to prosper on the merits, Barrett. composed.

The challenge followed a major 2022 judgment powered by the. Supreme Court's conservative majority enforcing limits on the. EPA's authority under the Clean Air Act to minimize coal- and. gas-fired power plant carbon emissions, undermining President. Joe Biden's plans to tackle environment change. The court in 2015. also hobbled the EPA's power to protect wetlands and battle water. contamination.

The challenge to the Excellent Next-door neighbor rule was brought by. Ohio, Indiana and West Virginia - all targeted by the guideline - as. well as pipeline operators, U.S. Steel, regional electricity. generators and energy trade associations. In their suit in the. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, they. argued that the EPA breached a federal law aimed at guaranteeing. company actions are affordable.

The D.C. Circuit declined to block the rule pending its. review, triggering the challengers to ask the Supreme Court,. which has a 6-3 conservative bulk, to step in.

Challengers have stated the guideline would enforce unreasonable costs. and destabilize power grids. The Justice Department, safeguarding. the EPA, urged the Supreme Court to think about the major damages. to public health that would arise from obstructing it.

The rule executed a federal program that used to 23. states, but separate challenges in lower courts have currently. stopped briefly enforcement in 12 of them, including West Virginia.

Throughout arguments in the event on Feb. 21, some of the. conservative justices concentrated on the EPA's absence of explanation. for how the plan can work when it now controls simply 11 states. instead of 23 as intended. Liberal justices revealed concern. about whether the case necessitated emergency intervention by the. Supreme Court at this time.

A few of the industry demands of the Supreme Court were. specific. Kinder Morgan asked the justices to obstruct the. regulation as it uses to natural gas pipeline engines. U.S. Steel looked for to prevent its enforcement against iron and steel. mill reheating heating systems and boilers. On Jan. 16, the EPA released a proposed guideline to impose the. Great Neighbor strategy in five more states: Arizona, Iowa, Kansas,. New Mexico and Tennessee.

The Supreme Court is choosing multiple cases throughout its. present term concerning obstacles to the authority of various. federal agencies. The justices on May 16 promoted the Customer. Financial Defense Bureau's financing mechanism in a challenge. brought by the payday advance loan industry.

(source: Reuters)