Latest News

Stalled Alaska LNG pipeline bill sends 'negative signal,' governor says

Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy expressed his "deep disappointment" at the failure of a bill in the Alaska legislature to move forward with a pipeline to export natural gases to Asia.

Dunleavy wrote in a late Wednesday post on X that the decision of the legislature not to reconvene to vote on a change to tax laws?needed to progress the $50 billion project pipeline and terminal would send a 'negative signal' to potential investors and partners. Local news station KTUU reported that legislators cited insufficient support of the bill.

This project will also improve access to gas for domestic use.

Dunleavy stated that Alaska is running out affordable and reliable natural gas. This is an issue that has been a problem for decades and it's become more urgent after years of inaction. Delaying action increases risks, costs and limits future options.

KTUU reported that Dunleavy was urging the lawmakers to reconvene for voting on August 20.

The Trump administration has promoted Alaska LNG as a means to increase national security and boost trade with allies and partners, including Japan.

Requests for comments were not immediately responded to by the White House or Department of Energy.

Glenfarne did not respond immediately to a comment request. Glenfarne executives stated in March that the war in the Middle East was causing Asia to be more interested in gas produced by Alaska LNG. The company said that it hoped to make the final investment decisions in this year or next and begin shipping "liquefied gas" by 2031.

JERA and Tokyo Gas, Japan's largest LNG importers have signed preliminary agreements to purchase a total of 2 million metric tonnes a year from Alaska LNG.

The project's export terminal and pipeline are awaiting final approvals because Glenfarne is still unable to sign binding contracts for 80% (of the 20 million tonnes of LNG) of its planned?exportation capacity.

Glenfarne executives claimed in March that they had secured commitments to produce 13 million tonnes of coal per year. They said that it needed to secure agreements for 3 million more tons and make all commitments legally binding in order to get financing. Reporting by Curtis Williams, Timothy Gardner and Rod Nickel.

(source: Reuters)