Latest News

EU's cleaner marine fuel rules are inflationary, shipbrokers say

European Union marine fuel guidelines, reliable from Jan. 1 as part of efforts to cut emissions, will raise shipping expenses, although companies with vessels that can run on alternative fuels, such as biodiesel and LNG, will benefit, 2 shipbrokers stated.

The policy is the second major EU guideline concentrated on cutting the shipping market's carbon emissions in as many years. Shipping transportations over 80% of all traded items and causes nearly 3% of greenhouse gas emissions.

The FuelEU Maritime regulation requires industrial ships above 5,000 gross tonnage operating in EU ports to cut emissions from marine fuels, likewise called bunker fuels, or pay charges.

Biofuels and other alternative fuels for ships remain in brief supply, and there is competitors from air travel and other sectors. That implies shipping business' costs will rise - and eventually, the boost will be passed onto customers and businesses, shipbrokers stated.

The new policy follows the EU's addition of shipping in its Emissions Trading System (ETS) in 2024 that suggests ships spend for their emissions made on voyages that include EU ports.

It is very important that we comprehend that shipping decarbonisation will be inflationary, as freight rates will be impacted, Kenneth Tveter, head of green transition at shipbroker Clarksons, said.

Mattia Ferracchiato, head of carbon markets at shipbroker BRS, likewise stated freight rates would increase as ships either pay a premium for greener fuels or a charge for stopping working to comply.

FuelEU penalties might equal 3% of the total freight expense for a tanker bring around 70,000 metric tons of crude or fuel oil in between the U.S. Gulf and Rotterdam, computations from BRS show.

A ton of extremely low sulphur (0.5%) marine fuel in Rotterdam cost 505 euros ($ 522) on Jan. 3, according to data from marine fuel platform ZeroNorth. Biodiesel-blended really low sulphur ( 0.5%) marine fuel in Rotterdam, meanwhile, cost 686 euros ($ 709) per heap, according to bunker intelligence platform Engine.

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

Under the guideline, qualified ships need to minimize bunker fuel emissions by 2% each year in between 2025-2029 from an emissions standard of 91.16 grams of CO2 equivalent, while the decrease target increases every five years up to 80% in 2050.

Changing to biofuel-blended bunker fuels and liquefied gas (LNG) will be amongst the most popular compliance choices, said Clarksons' Tveter.

But there were still downsides, he stated.

Biofuel supply is minimal and competition will be strong, specifically from aviation, he stated, adding air travel, unlike shipping, was used to needing to pay up for a premium fine-tuned item.

Shipping business with vessels that can run on option fuels will benefit, Tveter added. Biodiesel-blended fuel oils and LNG are the most readily offered alternative marine fuels.

Marine consultancy DNV stated the preferred alternative might be a. pooling system whereby ships that minimize emissions below the. limit of 91.16 grams of CO2 comparable create a surplus,. enabling numerous ships to comply with the FuelEU regulation.

Companies with many vessels could protect a compliance. surplus on chosen vessels, more than likely by switching to. biofuels, then using pooling to make the entire fleet certified.

Other firms might also purchase or sell allowances from other. shipping business.

A single vessel operating on LNG can make 4 other. same-sized ships compliant with the FuelEU guideline, according. to the European Commission.

(source: Reuters)