Latest News

US arms makers face Europe's push for local control

Customers were more concerned about American suppliers as U.S. defense companies visited Britain's Farnborough Airshow to tap into?Europe's military expenditure boom.

European governments demand greater control over defence equipment, more local production, and a larger?share of the industrial benefits. U.S. arm makers have responded by 'expanding their manufacturing in Europe, forming joint-ventures and offering more tailored product.

Daniel Tenney is Lockheed Martin’s senior vice-president of global business strategy and development. He said: "We heard loudly that Europeans want greater sovereignty and more localised capabilities."

PLEDGES OF LOCALIZATION

U.S. firms argue that it's faster and cheaper to purchase proven American systems rather than develop new ones. They also pledge to localise technology and production.

Lockheed announced at Farnborough that a Patriot interceptor with a lower cost would be developed in collaboration with European and U.S. Partners. This announcement comes just a few days after Lockheed announced plans to develop an Army Tactical Missile System with Germany's Rheinmetall. Raytheon, RTX’s Raytheon, announced recently that it has partnered with European companies to increase Stinger production. This includes assembling the missiles in The Netherlands.

Thomas Laliberty is the president of Raytheon’s land and aerial defence systems. He said that Europeans gain from widely used systems, like the Patriot. The many countries using the Patriot pool their funding to support such features as a database of threats. He said that the collective benefits them a great deal.

Other defence-tech companies are also trying to make a move. Anduril has increased its UK workforce, and is establishing local production in Poland of its Barracuda 500M cruise missile.

Richard Drake, Anduril UK's General Manager, said that each government has different needs for?localisation.

EUROPE?STRIVES TO INDEPENDENCE

Some Europeans are concerned that the U.S. may be less willing to or able to supply weapons, parts, or other support, especially if American defense companies have to prioritize U.S. military requirements in other regions.

Industry insiders and experts say that Europeans are no longer interested in finished products. They want to have access to the technology necessary to modify, repair and maintain their own equipment. Fabio Dalpan, senior partner of Boston Consulting Group in Milan, said that they want "a significant transfer of IP".

The U.S. defense industry is heavily dependent on Europe, but the concern for U.S. firms is if this trend towards increased autonomy will continue. Tom Waldwyn of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London said that this is "of great concern".

Some equipment, like F-35 fighters and Patriot air-defence systems, cannot be quickly replaced by Europe.

Sash Tusa is an aerospace and defense analyst with UK-based Agency Partners. He said that in other areas, "European capabilities may be good enough" and in cases where the country has a huge advantage in terms of sovereignty, they may even be cheaper. He added that this includes medium-range missiles for air defence. Analysts say that Europe is progressing in its efforts to wean itself off U.S. technology in certain?areas such as early-warning aircraft. NATO announced a $4.5 billion plan for up to 10 Saab GlobalEye'surveillance aircraft to replace aging AWACS - early warning aircraft. This is a Swedish solution over a rival system from U.S. planemaker Boeing.

Europeans, meanwhile, are working on developing new technologies. The British government announced that it would adopt a new unmanned fighter aircraft developed by UK-based BAE Systems as its "operational concepts demonstrator" at the airshow. This is despite the fact that a number of U.S. firms are already developing similar planes, some of which were displayed at Farnborough.

Last week, Air Vice-Marshal Jim Beck of the UK Royal Air Force, director of capability, said that Britain's program would have many vendors involved, but it would be "sovereign". "We must have the freedom to use our equipment at our discretion." (Reporting and editing by Joe Brock, Sharon Singleton, Cassell Bryan Low)

(source: Reuters)