Latest News
-
Protesters in Dover, England disrupt cross-Channel travel
Police and port authorities reported that groups of masked men protesting on roads around Dover (the main hub for ferries to France) disrupted traffic on Saturday. Social media videos posted by users showed men wearing black and balaclavas, and wearing scarves and?scarves, blocking roads at the port. Kent Police confirmed that it was "aware" of a protest currently taking place in the Port Of Dover. In a short statement, the police said that officers were present and engaged with protesters. The police didn't immediately respond to an inquiry for more information and details about the protest. The Port of Dover said that there is a "continuing public order incident" around the town of Dover, affecting all routes into and out of the port. The statement read: "We are in touch with Kent Police to understand the situation." Ferry operator P&O Ferries confirmed that its sailings are proceeding as planned. If you miss your booked departure today, we'll get you on the next available," said X.
-
US Judge again blocks Postal Service’s mail-in vote restrictions
Federal Judge extended the ban on President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing new U.S. Postal Service rule that would increase the number of mail-in votes required ahead of November's congressional elections. Boston-based ?U.S. District Judge Indira Telwani issued this injunction on behalf of Democratic-led state and voting rights organizations, after one State sent out mail ballots to the elections last Friday. Talwani wrote only Congress' laws can override state authority in elections. She added that "the executive does not have inherent authority" to change voting rules. Talwani wrote that Congress never delegated voting authority to the Postal Service. The new rule of the agency "is in conflict with Congress's statute scheme and is unconstitutional." Talwani wrote that the immediate deadlines required by the Postal Service rule would cause "chaos" among groups who provide information on how to vote. The League of Women Voters, for example, "does not know whether or not to advise its members to vote via mail, despite their legal entitlement," Talwani's ruling states. The administration filed an appeal notice quickly. USPS refused to comment on this ruling but U.S. postmaster general David Steiner defended their handling of the matter. Steiner stated on Friday that "we have always acted within our legal authority" to issue a regulation to achieve these policies. However, the courts will ultimately decide this question and we will follow their determination. The White House didn't immediately respond to our request for comment. RULE ON POSTAL SERVICES FOLLOWS TRUMP'S ORDER According to the rule, the USPS must receive lists of recipients for mail ballots from the states. All outgoing and return?ballot envelops must have unique barcodes. Under the rule, the USPS may refuse to deliver any ballots that are not compliant with the new standards, or those associated with voters not appearing on the list. Talwani is an Obama appointee who issued a temporary injunction last week to stop the USPS from enforcing its rule. She was deciding whether or not to issue a more permanent injunction. The administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to intervene and lift a temporary order, so that the rule can take effect. Last week, the court's conservative majority of 6-3 lifted an order Talwani had issued that prevented USPS from imposing restrictions. USPS released its rule in March to implement the executive order that Trump signed after years of calling for restrictions on voting by mail. All 50 states permit some form of mail in voting. 29 states allow voters to request to vote by mail, without providing any reason. Eight other states conduct their entire election by mail. North Carolina became the first state to mail ballots in the November elections on Friday. If the rule is allowed to go into effect, it could force state officials to make changes to their systems in just a few weeks, to conform to a system critics say USPS has not yet implemented. Talwani stated that it is "implausible", that states will be able comply with this rule in time for the upcoming elections of this year, since it would require 10,000 jurisdictions redesigning their ballots, printing them, and submitting voter information to an online portal run by USPS that doesn't yet exist. The court concluded that the disenfranchisement of Plaintiff Organizations members, regardless their residence, was inevitable. The administration asked a federal court of appeals to overturn Talwani’s original restraining orders. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston had not yet acted on this request. Circuit Court of Appeals hadn't acted on this request before the Judge issued her latest ruling.
-
US Judge again blocks Postal Service’s mail-in vote restrictions
On Friday, a federal judge in Boston extended a ban that prevented President Donald Trump from implementing any new?U.S. Postal Service rule would increase the number of mail-in votes required ahead of November's congressional elections. The Boston-based U.S. district judge Indira Talwani issued an injunction on behalf of Democratic-led States and voting rights groups, after the country's first state sent out its mail ballots?for the elections?on Friday. Talwani is an Obama appointee who issued a temporary injunction last week to stop the USPS from enforcing its rule. She was deciding whether or not to issue a more permanent injunction. On Thursday, the administration had asked the U.S. Supreme Court for intervention and to lift the restraining orders so that the rule could go into effect. Last week, the court's conservative majority of 6-3 lifted an order Talwani had issued that prevented USPS from imposing restrictions. USPS released its?rule in order to implement the executive order Trump signed back in March. This was after the Republican President had called for years to restrict voting via mail, and pushed the?false claims that the defeat of his 2020 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden resulted from widespread voter fraud. All outgoing and return ballot envelopes are required to have unique barcodes. USPS may refuse to deliver any ballots that are not compliant with the new standards or those associated with voters not listed on the list. Talwani was temporarily blocked by voting rights advocates, and several Democratic-led States, last week. They argued that the rule could disenfranchise voters, and violated the U.S. Constitution which grants states the power to administer elections. The lawyers of the U.S. Department of Justice countered by stating that USPS has the authority to implement "modest" requirements for envelope design. The state election officials said that if the rule was implemented, they would still have full control over who can vote by mail. All 50 states permit some form of mail in voting. In 29 of those states, voters can?ask for a mail-in ballot without providing any reason. Eight other states conduct their entire elections by mail. North Carolina became the first state on Friday to mail ballots in the November elections. If the rule is allowed to take effect, it could force state officials to restructure their systems in just a few weeks before elections to comply with a system that critics claim USPS isn't ready to implement. Many state election offices have already printed their envelopes and votes. In a court document filed on Thursday, September 3, a USPS official stated that the 'online portal states would use to upload voter lists is not yet active. The official said that states could use the portal at some point in the week of Sept. 7. The U.S. released a whistleblower's statement on Tuesday from an anonymous federal employee. Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a Democrat, alleged on Tuesday that USPS was rushing into implementing a 'new system created hastily that risks disrupting the delivery during the election of mail ballots. The administration asked a federal court of appeals to overturn Talwani’s first restraining orders. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston had not yet acted on this request. Circuit Court of Appeals hadn't acted on this request before the Judge issued her latest ruling.
-
Panama Canal defers Neopanamax draft reduction
The Panama Canal Authority on Friday postponed further a planned reduction in the maximum draft allowed for its Neopanamax locks to '14.48 meters (47.5 feet), which was scheduled to go into effect on October 1. This decision was made due higher than expected water levels at Gatun Lake, and favorable weather forecasts. A ship's draft is the minimum depth of water it needs to be able to float. If the limit is lower, the vessel may need to carry less cargo to get through the canal. In the Neopanamax lock, a maximum draft of 48 ft (14.63 meters) will continue to be allowed. The authority didn't give a new deadline for the potential reduction, but said that it would make any future adjustments to draft?in due time. The authority delayed the move from 14.48 meters up to 14.63 meters for the Neopanamax locks until October 1. The move was accompanied by a reduction in daily transits to prepare for an El Nino-like season that is expected to lower water levels. This reverses a previous promise not limit vessel passage.
-
US Senate Democrats ask Postal Service to stop work on new mail-in voting regulations
The?U.S. Postal Service was urged by lawmakers to halt the work on new mail-in voting rules. Postal Service ordered the halt to "work" on new rules for mail-in voting, Friday. In a letter to the USPS, Senator Gary Peters from Michigan and six other Democrats on the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee wrote: "The Postal Service’s continued illegal efforts to transform itself into an electoral administration agency under the direction of President Trump risk disenfranchising American voters and threatening the integrity of the upcoming elections." On Thursday night, the Trump administration requested that the Supreme Court allow it to enforce a new USPS rule restricting the use mail-in votes. USPS didn't immediately comment. The Democratic Senators -- Peters, Richard Blumenthal, Maggie Hassan, Andy Kim, Elissa, Slotkin, and John Fetterman, all of Pennsylvania, and Ruben, Gallego, of Arizona -- warned that the "verification" system planned by USPS "could collapse the absentee voting system, and disenfranchise millions of Americans." U.S. district judge Indira Talwani issued an order temporarily prohibiting the USPS to enforce the new rule. The USPS adopted the new rule following an executive directive by the Republican President restricting mail-in votes. USPS regulations would require new standards for voter data and ballot envelopes, and could refuse delivery of any ballots that did not meet these requirements. Critics say this could lead to thousands of votes being invalidated as the election date of November 3 draws near. Republicans are in a fierce battle to "retain" control of Congress during the elections. Critics claim that restricting mail in ballots would benefit Republicans more than Democrats, since Democratic voters are traditionally more likely to mail in ballots. The new USPS rule requires that states provide the postal service with lists of voters who will be receiving mail ballots. They must also use envelopes for outgoing and return mail ballots which are approved by the agency, and have barcodes. Postal?services could refuse to send ballots that don't comply with new standards, or are associated with voters not listed on the list. Trump has cast doubts on the security of mail-in votes for years, even though evidence of voter fraud in rare. Trump has falsely claimed that widespread fraud is occurring in U.S. election, including his loss to Joe Biden as former Democratic president in 2020.
-
Norway will help Russians stuck in Arctic after ship seize, says government
Norway's foreign ministry said on Friday that it would provide the necessary assistance to Russians in the Arctic Svalbard Islands following the arrest of a ship carrying passengers and supplies to the archipelago. The Norwegian court ordered this week the seizure of the Professor Molchanov Cruise Ship in Svalbard on behalf of an Ukrainian company involved in legal disputes, leaving its passengers and crew stranded and leading Moscow accuse Norway "piracy". Norway's Foreign Ministry said that they were complying with their international obligations by protecting Russian citizens in Svalbard. Statistics Norway reports that the town of Barentsburg is where the ship is docked. It is one of two Russian settlements in Svalbard, with a total of 392 residents. The ministry said that Russian companies receive regular'sanctions relief' to allow them to import food and other essential goods to the islands. According to Cruisemapper's website, the 71-metre-long Professor Molchanov has 32 crew members and 52 passengers. It also features a bar, a sauna, a library and two restaurants. The vessel is used both for commercial cruises and scientific expeditions. The seizure of the assets was ordered by a court on behalf Naftogaz - a Ukrainian energy company - which is seeking to enforce a compensation award of $4.22 billion for 'assets Moscow took in 2014 when it annexed Crimea. Russia plans to appeal this ruling.
-
What is Ukraine's SBU Security Agency?
On Friday, Russia launched a drone at the Security Service of Ukraine's (SBU) headquarters in central Kyiv. Ukrainian authorities called it the latest in a series of war escalations. The following are key facts about the organization. What is the?SBU? SBU is an enigmatic and powerful organisation which emerged from the Ukrainian branch KGB of Soviet times when Ukraine became independent in 1991. The SBU has broad powers over matters of domestic security. It has been involved in combat since the Russian invasion of 2022, and it is now investigating war crimes, countering a cyberattack, conducting counterintelligence, and catching Russian agents. Alpha special forces have also conducted drone attacks against Russian military hardware in the field as well as on oil refineries and other military installations deep within Russia. They've also used sea drones against tankers transporting Russian oil. Authors of 'Operation Spiderweb' It has claimed to have carried out some spectacular wartime operations against Russia. For example, it used a truck bomb to attack Russia's bridge into the occupied Ukrainian peninsula Crimea in 2022. Last year, the organization masterminded a sophisticated '2025 drone strike, codenamed Spiderweb. It targeted a number of Russian strategic air-bombers deep within Russia. It is widely regarded as being a key player in the covert campaign to assassinate senior Russian military figures and others who are blamed by Ukraine as having committed war crimes. Russia has called these killings terrorist attacks. Who is in charge of the?SBU? According to President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the agency is headed by Oleksandr Pklad. His office was the target of the drone which hit the SBU headquarters in Kyiv last Friday. Poklad was not hurt, according to the agency. He was appointed in July. How big is the SBU? During the war, the SBU grew in size. The SBU's size is secret, but the maximum number of employees it can have in wartime is 41,000. The figure is probably in the same ballpark. Last year, the legislative cap was raised from its previous threshold of 31,000 personnel during wartime. BITTER RIVALRY WITH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE The 'SBU' has had a long-standing rivalry with Ukraine's military spy agency, the Main Intelligence Directorate. This week, a dispute between the two organisations escalated into a shooting in Kyiv that left several military intelligence officers injured. Zelenskiy ordered an investigation to determine what happened.
-
Portugal asks Air France, KLM and Lufthansa to improve their offers for TAP sale
Portugal's government asked rivals Lufthansa and Air 'France-KLM to submit better offers for a'minority stake' in the 'flag carrier TAP', starting a final round of negotiations, after judging that both groups' first bids were too similar to choose one. In July, both European airline groups made binding but undisclosed offers to purchase a 44.9% stake in TAP. They also offered to become TAP's strategic partner. The?government received the assessment of the offers from Parpublica, the state-owned holding company. Leitao Amaro stated that the two binding offers "differeced in their content but were rated as being broadly similar overall". He told reporters that after a cabinet session, "we have decided to start a final round?of negotiations lasting a few weeks. During?this time we expect bidders to increase their offers." Portugal has revived its long-delayed TAP privatisation in July 2025. It is looking for a strategic investor who can expand the airline's reach internationally and increase its competitiveness. The winning bidder will have the option of acquiring any shares that are not claimed by employees. TAP's biggest attraction is its?valued?slots connecting its Lisbon hub to Brazil, Portuguese-speaking African nations and the United States. These routes are important for Portugal's diaspora and tourism, as well as investment. The government has asked that the future strategic partner of TAP support growth in Portugal's airport system, strengthening operations and connectivity, not only in Lisbon, but also in Porto and Faro and in the Azores and Madeira. The government can sell the remaining 50% stake in the company to the strategic investor.
The paper trail that links a US fuel dealer to a Mexican cartel
According to Mexican sources who have direct knowledge of this matter, and four Mexican government documents, Ikon Midstream is being investigated in Mexico for fuel smuggling.
Documents and sources indicate that the probe is part and parcel of ongoing investigations on maritime shipments from the U.S. to Canada of petroleum products in an alleged scheme of evading a large tax due for these imports.
Ikon Midstream was allegedly one of the "central pieces," in a alleged scheme that involved one of Mexico's largest crime groups, Jalisco New Generation Cartel, or CJNG. According to a document, Mexico's Attorney General's Office?opened an investigation against the company based on "testimonies, documents, and surveillance."
The Attorney General's Office of Mexico did not respond to any requests for comments.
According to security sources and the document, the Texas trader’s export of Diesel aboard the tanker Torm Agnes, is being examined for possible cartel connections, as well as Ikon Midstream’s purported relationship with an alleged CJNG related trucking company who helped offload cargo from the vessel in the ports Ensenada, and Guaymas.
According to the U.S. Government, smuggled fuels and stolen crude oils are now the second largest source of revenue behind narcotics for Mexico's cartels.
Two documents described the alleged racket and its players. Ikon Midstream, for example, was accused of being a supplier in Mexico of petroleum products, which were allegedly moved through an intricate web of importers and distributors, as well as transporters and facilitators. The summaries for the other two documents were included. The security sources confirmed that the four documents were produced in March and April.
Rhett Knagy, Ikon Midstream's Executive Director, responded in an email on May 12 that "not one shred of evidence" could be found to support the allegations. The company would not respond to hearsay accusations.
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's primary transnational investigation agency, executed a criminal warrant at Ikon Midstream Houston offices on 14 April, a DHS spokeswoman said in a statement released April 17. The statement stated that the search warrant was part of an ongoing criminal investigation. DHS didn't elaborate and did not say if it was working with Mexican authorities.
Ikon Midstream repeatedly denies wrongdoing. Ikon Midstream, in a statement dated April 24, said that it has never provided and does not provide material support or resources for CJNG.
Mexican authorities announced that at least 16 arrests have been made since September, in relation to fuel smuggling. Officials have claimed to have uncovered "a criminal structure" behind alleged illicit activities, but have not publicly identified the detainees.
In an October report, detailed how diesel exported by Ikon Midstream on the tanker Torm Agnes found its way to Intanza, the Mexican company authorities suspect of being a front for CJNG. Intanza does not have a listed phone number, a website, a social media presence, or a physical address that authorities could locate.
This story detailed how Mexican cartels make billions each year by smuggling fuel - mainly from the U.S. - to Mexico. It's a huge tax dodge. Diesel, gasoline, and naphtha, are declared as lubricants in trade documents to avoid a high import duty charged by Mexico on these imported fuels.
According to the U.S. Government, smuggled fuels and stolen crude oils have become Mexico's cartels' second largest source of revenue behind narcotics. The government has intensified efforts to crackdown on this illicit trade. In February 2025, the Trump administration designated CJNG a terrorist organization.
Trade experts, tax officials and law enforcement officials have reported that the paperwork used for import-export transactions is often incomplete, or even faked, by smugglers. They use front companies and established players in the oil industry to help facilitate these deals, with some colluding and others unknowingly, while others are acting without their knowledge.
Ikon Midstream filed a defamation suit on November 14, in a Texas district court, claiming that the news agency had made "categorically untrue" statements in the article from October about its business. The news agency stands by its reporting, and it is fighting the lawsuit.
Ikon Midstream has said that it did not do business with Intanza. Ikon Midstream released internal documents after the publication of the 'October report. These showed that the Torm Agnes cargo, along with three other 2025 shipments containing diesel and naphtha on the tanker TormLouise?were sold by Ikon Midstream to a Mexican client named Azteca Cone.
Azteca Cone is also under investigation, along with Intanza, for suspected fuel smuggling, and possible links to CJNG. This is according to three Mexican security sources, and two government security documents.
Azteca Cone is a mystery in the fuel business. Azteca Cone, like Intanza has no phone number, web address or physical location.
Ikon Midstream's internal documents, which it shared with us, also showed that Ikon Midstream had incorrectly classified the cargo in at least four of its shipments to the United States last year. Ikon Midstream had some of its own documents that described the cargo as being lubricants. This contradicted statements made last year by both the Texas company's attorney and the commercial manager for the tankers who said the vessels were carrying diesel and naphtha. It is important to make this distinction because fuels imported from Mexico are taxed heavily.
According to law enforcement officials, smuggling can be difficult to detect when mislabeled records are matched with what is declared by the recipient country. For example, both parties declare cargo as lubricants, but the product in question is actually diesel.
Ikon Midstream, in its statement of April 24, acknowledged that it made mistakes in its export filings. This was a reversal from earlier statements by the company claiming that it used the correct product code in its declarations to U.S. Customs. The company's updated statement characterized the repeated inaccuracies of its paperwork as "clerical mistakes" and stated that there was "no intention to avoid duty."
The story was not commented on by the oil shipping giant Torm. It is responsible for managing the tankers Torm Agnes, and Torm Louise. Torm, a Danish company, said last year it ended its business with Ikon Midstream based on "what has been revealed." However, the company did not provide any further details.
Four sources familiar with this deal have confirmed that Imperial Oil is the Canadian oil company which owns the majority of Exxon Mobil.
Documents shared by Ikon Midstream show that Exxon was also listed on the inspection reports for three Torm Louise shipments. This indicates that the oil giant provided the fuel to Ikon Midstream. On inspection certificates, the parties listed are usually the buyer and seller as well as terminal operators.
Exxon has not responded to numerous requests for comments. A person with knowledge of the matter stated that Exxon cut ties with Ikon Midstream by mid-2025.
Ikon Midstream purchased 120,000 barrels last year, which were loaded on the Torm Agnes tanker in Canada and transported to Mexico. Intanza received it. Port records show that the cargo was declared twice to Mexican customs, first at the Port of Ensenada where a portion of it was loaded into fuel trucks and then in the Port of Guaymas where the remainder was discharged in the same manner.
This misclassification enabled Intanza avoid paying around $7 million of tax on diesel. The tax was calculated based on volume and tax rate.
Mexican security sources said that Mefra Fletes, a trucking firm in Mexico, helped remove the Torm Agnes Diesel from both ports. According to four documents from the government, the company was also identified as a central piece in the alleged fuel-smuggling plot.
According to two security documents and three Mexican sources of security, Mefra Fletes has worked closely with Ikon Midstream in the past, transferring petroleum products from tanker to truck at several Mexican ports. In August, a reporter stopped at the Houston offices of Ikon Midstream and was turned away by an employee who claimed to be from Ikon Midstream. He had previously worked for Mefra Fletes. The man refused to reveal his full name.
Five owners or representatives of Mefra Fletes were named in a fifth, undated, Mexican government security document. The document was partially viewed. It also alleged that the five had ties to CJNG. It was not possible to determine if any of these people had been charged or to reach Mefra FLetes. The company does not have a presence on social media, nor a listed phone number or an address.
Ikon Midstream has not answered any questions regarding its purported relationship to Mefra Flates.
The FUEL TRADER'S VANISHING Clients
Ikon Midstream, in its lawsuit against a Mexican company, claimed to be an exporter and that it is solely responsible for the declarations made at Mexican customs.
Eight legal experts were consulted to determine what U.S. exporters should do to ensure that their customers are not sanctioned and are not connected to sanctioned parties. Ephraim Wernick is a Vinson & Elkins partner and former U.S. Department of Justice prosecution who specializes in foreign corruption and anti-money laundering cases. He says that such vigilance will be critical once CJNG, five other Mexican cartels, and the United States list of designated terrorist organizations are updated in February 2025. He said that U.S. prosecutors have greater leeway in pursuing parties suspected of giving cartels material support.
Wernick said, "You can't bury your head in the ground." He noted that he was unfamiliar with Ikon Midstream and its transactions in Mexico.
Ikon Midstream, in a statement dated April 24, said that it screens customers with a "risk based due diligence program." The company said that it has never transacted with an entity on the U.S. sanction list and that no counterparty had displayed "payment behaviour inconsistent with that of a legitimate wholesale purchaser."
Azteca Cone's physical address and even the most basic of information was not available.
Two journalists visited an industrial area on the outskirts Monterrey, in northern Mexico, in November using an Azteca Cone address listed on four invoices for 2025 provided by Ikon. This location was the home of a metalworking firm called C.W. Tech. C.W. Tech has been located at this address for three years.
C.W. Tech has not responded to any requests for comments. No indications exist that the company is involved in this alleged fuel smuggling scam.
According to an analysis of permits issued since 2021 or 2022, Azteca Cone and Intanza have never held the permits required by Mexico’s Energy Ministry for the importation of diesel or naphtha to Mexico. Two Mexican attorneys who specialize in energy and tax issues said that importers without these permits could face heavy fines or even prison time.
The Energy Ministry has not responded to any requests for comments.
Ikon Midstream stated that it was not responsible for verifying Azteca Cone's physical presence, nor did it have any obligation under U.S. law or Mexican law, to verify if its Mexican client held these permits. This statement, dated April 1, said.
Azteca Cone, as well as Intanza, have also had an important government approval revoked. In order to import any goods into Mexico, each company must be registered with the SAT (the nation's tax authority). According to the official list of suspended firms, Intanza as well as Azteca Cone, were both suspended from SAT's importers' registry on March 31, 2025. These suspensions were made less than one month after Torm AGNES arrived at the Mexican port of Ensenada in March 2025.
According to the list of suspensions, Intanza? and Azteca Cone lost their import authorizations due to their connection with another party who had been banned from importing. The document didn't name the third-party or explain why they were suspended.
The Mexican tax authority has not responded to any requests for comments.
Ikon Midstream stated in a statement dated April 1, that "it cannot be held responsible for any regulatory actions taken after the fact against a client."
Altana, a trade analytics firm in Mexico, reported that in addition to Azteca Cone, Intanza and other Mexican companies, thirteen others declared doing business with Ikon Midstream from October 11, 2019 to May 4, 2025. They imported products such as lubricants, fuel trucks, but no diesel, gasoline, or naphtha. Mexico's tax agency also suspended ten of these companies from the import registry - seven in 2025, according to its list of suspensions.
This list gave a number of reasons why these suspensions occurred: some of the companies were not able to be located by tax authorities. Others didn't file tax returns. Some didn't have all the documentation required to justify their foreign transactions. These cases were not detailed in the suspension list; tax authorities do not make details public.
SAT has not responded to any requests for comments about the suspension of Azteca Cone or Intanza, nor did it respond to questions regarding its suspensions. In a public document published by the tax authority in 2026, SAT said that it suspects that one of these firms - Komercialis – is a phantom firm that issued fake bills for transactions that did not take place.
No one responded to the requests for comments. The majority of companies did not have a listed phone number, or an internet presence. Many questions sent via courier were not delivered because the listed addresses of most companies could not be located.
Ikon Midstream stated that all of its counterparties had a business address at the time they transacted with it, in a statement dated April 24, 2004.
"IF NOTHING, THIS IS SUSPICIOUS"
The World Customs Organization developed product codes to standardize the way countries identify and track goods that enter or leave their borders. These codes are called Harmonized Tariff Scheduling (HTS) in the U.S.
The system is easy for smugglers to abuse, despite its precision. Customs officials cannot inspect each shipment to verify that the codes on the trade paperwork match the goods. Trade experts and authorities say that smugglers who want to avoid Mexican import duties for fuel often code their cargo as lubricants, or another type of petroleum product which is exempt from levy.
Ikon Midstream reported that it used Torm tankers for at least five shipments to Mexico of petroleum products. Both companies said that the cargoes they delivered were naphtha and diesel. The export documentation that the fuel trader provided for four of these shipments revealed that Ikon Midstream had used HTS codes to identify lubricants.
Two bills of lading were issued, one on January 7, 2025 and the other on January 24, 2025 for shipments departing Texas aboard the vessel Torm Louise. Both bills of lading had the HTS code for both cargoes, 2710.19.3020. According to the description of this code in the online database of HTS Codes by the U.S. Government, the number represents lubricating oil used in marine, automotive or diesel engines. Written descriptions on the bills of lading also described the cargo as being lubricating oil.
Ikon Midstream provided U.S. Export Documents for two additional shipments - a cargo containing diesel and naphtha that was sent aboard the Torm Louise in February and March of last year and diesel aboard the Torm Agnes. Both shipments used HTS codes as lubricants.
Ikon Midstream lawyer stated in an email dated October 29, that it was appropriate to use 2710.19.3020 because "it is a general product category and not a specific cargo listing."
The U.S. Government disagreed with this interpretation. U.S. Customs and Border Protection declined to comment on specific companies, investigations or reports. However, it did say that 2710.19.3020 was not the correct code for naphtha or diesel.
It is possible to make occasional mistakes on documents relating to international trade due clerical error, misunderstandings or a language barrier. CBP spokesperson stated that repeated inaccuracies could be considered as a violation of the foreign trade regulations.
CBP takes repeated errors in HTS code seriously, both for imports and exports. CBP may take enforcement and compliance actions including seizures, penalties, and increased scrutiny.
James Swanson is a former director of cargo security and controls for CBP. He said that Ikon Midstream repeatedly used incorrect HTS codes in U.S. Export paperwork. This was especially alarming to him because the Mexican importer had made the same error on their customs filings. He said it was hard to believe that this was an accident. This is at least suspicious.
Ikon Midstream, when presented with CBP's position regarding the product codes, admitted that it made mistakes in its export filings. It described the errors as minor and unintentional and stated in its statement on April 24 to the news agency that it was "committed" to accurately classifying products going forward.
Speaking generally about fuel smuggling and the use of false tariff codes, a former investigator for Mexico's tax authorities said that smugglers are now coordinating both ends of the transaction, using the same fake tariff codes in Mexico and the U.S. to make it harder for law enforcement officials to detect their deception.
Former investigators said that such subterfuge was "the most sophisticated and complex we've ever seen." It requires both importers and exporters to work together, as well as a good deal of technical expertise and a solid strategic plan.
Ikon Midstream stated in its statement of April 1, "There was no coordination between Ikon Midstream, Azteca Cone and tariff codes"
(source: Reuters)