Latest News

Judge rejects US Postal Service's proposal to restrict mail-in voting

A federal judge blocked the U.S. Postal Service's proposed limitations on mail-in votes were blocked by a federal judge Wednesday, who found that they violated an agreement with a major civil rights group which required that mail-in ballots be handled expeditiously. The Washington-based U.S. district judge Emmet Sullivan's decision marked the second court defeat for U.S. president Donald?Trump in just a few weeks, as his Republican Party is locked in a tight fight to maintain control over both houses of Congress. Trump has said for years, without any evidence, that mail-in voting was prone to fraud. This assertion is a pillar in his campaign to undermine confidence in U.S. election, along with his false claim that his defeat at the 2020 elections was due to widespread voter fraud.

Postal Service proposed in May a rule that states must provide voter lists and adopt new voting procedures before they can make delivery. The Postal Service refused to deliver ballots if states didn't comply. Sullivan, appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton to the bench, sided the NAACP right group in arguing that the new rule was against a 2021 'legal settlement' that required USPS officials take "extraordinary steps" to ensure timely mailing of ballots through 2028. The Justice Department, who represents the administration before the court, did not immediately respond to requests for comments. Sullivan's decision prevented the Postal Service implementing the 'proposed regulations', which'stemmed' from Trump's executive order in March directing the Department of Homeland Security compile a list of U.S. citizens confirmed to be eligible to vote for each'state' and requiring that the USPS only deliver mail-in ballots to those voters listed on each'state's approved list of mail-in ballots. U.S. district judge Indira Talwani, based in Boston, blocked Trump's implementation of the "entire executive order" ahead of the midterm elections.

The judge sided with the coalition of Democratic-led states in ruling that Trump exceeded his authority by trying to overhaul election procedures, which have been managed by local and state governments since 1789 when the republic was founded. (Reporting and editing by Franklin Paul, Cynthia Osterman, and Luc Cohen from New York)

(source: Reuters)