Latest News

Uber claims some sexual assault accusers presented fake receipts

Uber found that in more than 100 cases, passengers who accused its drivers of sexual assault or harassment provided phony or doctored receipts as proof or failed to explain why they could not provide receipts.

Uber filed a court document on Wednesday urging U.S. district judge Charles Breyer to order that 21 plaintiffs who have receipts they are not sure of should justify their claims, and 90 plaintiffs without receipts provide them, or give "non boilerplate" reasons as to why they were absent.

Court documents show that at least 11 law firms are representing the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were not charged with any wrongdoing.

Uber is trying its best to limit its liability in the nationwide federal litigation, which includes more than 2,450 lawsuits alleging misconduct by drivers. San Francisco's company is facing several hundred more lawsuits at San Francisco Superior Court.

In a joint press release, lawyers Rachel Abrams (lead federal litigation for plaintiffs), Sarah London, and Roopal Luhana said that they take Uber's claims seriously.

Uber has said that it knows that some victims of sexual assault may not have receipts, because they ordered their ride from someone else. The increased risk that guests face when assaulted makes Uber's emphasis on documentation "more disturbing."

Uber maintains that it is not liable for the criminal acts of drivers who connect with its passengers and that background checks and disclosures are sufficient.

Breyer dismissed on July 8 some claims of fraud and liability based upon ads that promoted Uber's ridesharing service as an alternative to drunken driving.

Uber's Wednesday filing revealed that some fake receipts appeared to have been generated by third-party websites.

Uber claimed that some receipts had math errors, bogus surcharges or were timestamped before the ride occurred. They also said they contained stray marks or did not match their own formatting.

The company stated that one plaintiff had submitted two receipts, and two plaintiffs had submitted different versions of a receipt.

Uber stated that honesty is the most important factor in maintaining the integrity of our court system. It is hard to imagine a more grave act of misconduct than the fabrication of evidence by plaintiffs in this case.

In re Uber Technologies Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Case, U.S. District Court Northern District of California No. 23-03084. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, New York Editing Rod Nickel

(source: Reuters)