Latest News
-
Documents show that Vietnam cracks down on fraudulent US exports
According to a document reviewed, the Vietnam trade ministry issued a directive to crackdown on illegal transshipment of goods into the United States or other trading partners in order to avoid high U.S. Tariffs. In the directive, dated April 15 and in effect that day, the ministry said that trade fraud would likely increase due to growing tensions caused by U.S. Tariffs. It said that if fraud was not prevented it would "make it more difficult to avoid the sanctions that countries would apply to imported products" The directive didn't name specific countries from which transshipment fraud could originate. Vietnam imports almost 40% of its goods from China, and Washington has accused Beijing of using Vietnam as a hub for transhipment to avoid U.S. duty. The Trump administration has imposed "reciprocal tariffs" of 46% on Vietnam. These are currently paused, but if they were to be applied, it could severely undermine a model for growth that relies heavily on exports into the United States, and huge investments by foreign manufacturers in the country. The directive instructs officials from the Trade Ministry, Customs, and other agencies to intensify their supervision and inspection of imported goods in order to determine their origin. "Especially imported raw materials that are used for production and exported". The Vietnamese Trade Ministry's document stated that new stricter procedures will be implemented for inspecting factories and supervising the release of labels "Made in Vietnam". "Especially for enterprises where the number of certificates of origin applications has suddenly increased," it said. The directive instructs officials to take "specific measures" to prevent illegal transshipment when necessary. The directive was released after an urgent meeting of the Vietnam government office in early April, just hours after U.S. president Donald Trump announced duties.
-
Environmental lawyers are ready to take on Trump's deregulation of energy
Environmental groups in the United States say they're hiring lawyers and getting ready for a legal battle with the Trump administration, which is attempting to bypass federal regulations regarding oil, gas, and coal development. The preparations are a test of the Trump administration’s strategy, which has been relying on executive orders and emergency powers to cut down what they see as obstacles to an increase in fossil fuel energy. Trump has issued an executive directive directing agencies that they must sunset all existing energy regulations by the end of next year. In a separate memo, he said agencies could repeal certain regulations, without consulting the public. Federal officials also informed companies via email that they could seek exemptions from clean air regulations. They exempted several companies from mercury and toxic air limits. A controversial oil pipeline tunnel was fast-tracked in the Great Lakes. Attorneys and policy experts have said that these actions are a test of existing law. This includes provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1947, which requires agencies to publish notices of final and proposed regulations, and to allow public comment. In an interview, Dan Goldbeck said, "They are really kicking it up a notch now." Goldbeck is the director of regulatory policies at the conservative think-tank American Action Forum. "They're trying to push a few of these legal doctrines to see if it can be implemented into a new policy frame." Earthjustice, an environmental group, said that it was hiring lawyers to prepare for a legal challenge against some of Trump's actions. It said that the organization currently has 10 positions open for lawyers and plans to add to its stable of 200 lawyers this year. Earthjustice, along with other groups, say that they are ready to file a lawsuit as soon as Trump's agencies implement his directives. This includes his order to sunset federal energy regulations. Sambhav Sankar is Earthjustice's senior vice president of programs. He said that the proposal by President Trump was almost comically illegal. "If any federal agency tries to do this, we will see them in court." Nevertheless, the groups say that it is important to wait until the administration acts on Trump's orders. David Bookbinder is the director of law, policy and environmental integrity at the Environmental Integrity Project. The White House has not responded to a question about possible legal challenges by environmental groups. Bookbinder, of EIP, said that the Interior and Commerce Departments gave environmental lawyers a target last week when they proposed a new rule allowing agencies to approve projects that destroy the habitats for endangered species. He said, "This is in a sense what we've been looking forward to - not the big announcements from the White House." Zach Pilchen, senior attorney at Holland & Knight and former member of the Trump and Biden Administrations, says that it may be more difficult to challenge the exemptions from mercury and toxic air pollutants for coal-fired plants. Trump relied upon a provision in the Clean Air Act, passed by Congress back in 1990. This allows the president to exempt some sources from the law for reasons of national security or if mitigation technology isn't available. Pilchen said, "This is new territory." "That provision has not been tested, and it may be difficult to challenge in court." He stated that the Clean Air Act contains a judicial-review provision governing lawsuits involving actions taken by the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, but does not mention specific actions taken by the President. Earthjustice's Sankar stated that his organization anticipates having to challenge the actions of the administration repeatedly in the coming years. He cited the government's refusal to comply with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that ordered it to facilitate the return of a Salvadoran deported by mistake and currently held in a notorious El Salvador prison. Sankar said that, "normally, in impact litigation, after you win, the government will change its behavior in similar cases in order to conform to the precedent." He added that he didn't expect the administration to continue to follow precedent. (Reporting from Nichola Groom, Los Angeles; Valerie Volcovici, Washington; Editing by Marguerita Choy)
-
Minister: Morocco will begin the tendering process for LNG Terminal
Leila Benjamin, the Energy Minister, said that Morocco will issue a statement of interest within a few weeks for a terminal of liquefied gas near Nador in eastern Mediterranean. Benali informed members of the parliament that "this week we will launch a call for expressions of interest in developing the first phase" of the Nador natural gas terminal. Morocco is looking to natural gas as a way to diversify its energy sources and move away from coal. It also continues to push forward with its renewable energy plans, aiming to achieve 52% of the total installed capacity by 2030 from 45% at present. She said that the new infrastructure would be connected to an existing pipeline used by Morocco to import 0.5 billion cubic metres (bcms) of gas from Spanish Terminals. She said that the terminal would be connected to industrial zones near Kenitra and Mohammedia in the northwestern Atlantic, but did not provide any further details. In May, citing a ministry official, it was reported that the new infrastructure would be a floating storage unit and regasification (FSRU), located at the deepwater Nador West Med Port, which is currently being constructed. The ministry did not respond to a comment request immediately. According to estimates by the ministry, Morocco's gas demand is expected to grow to 8 billion cubic meters in 2027. It currently stands at 1 billion cubic metres. Benali reported that, on the same date, Morocco's electric utility (ONEE), adopted a plan for 2025-2030 to increase installed electricity capacity by 15 gigawatts. This includes 13 GW of renewable energy. She said that this will require a total of 120 billion dirhams (13 bln dollars) in investment. (Reporting by Ahmed Eljechtimi Editing by Marguerita Choy) (Reporting and Editing by Marguerita Chôy)
-
Patrushev, a Kremlin hawk, says that trust between Russia and the U.S. needs to be restored
Nikolai Patrushev is one of the Kremlin’s senior hawks. He said that the trust between Russia and the United States, the "great powers", should be restored. Moscow was also ready to resume its cooperation with America on the Arctic. Donald Trump, the U.S. president, has shifted his focus towards Russia to try to end the three year war in Ukraine. He and his administration see China as the greatest threat to the United States. The Kremlin welcomed the opportunity to restore relations with the United States, after the confrontation about Ukraine caused what diplomats in both countries described as the worst crisis ever experienced by their relationship. The Kommersant reported that Kremlin aide Patrushev - a Cold War veteran who helped to formulate the Kremlin’s national security policy - said: "Russia and the United States as great powers have historically borne special responsibility for world fate." "And our experience over the past decades, or even centuries, shows that we have always been able to overcome our differences in the most difficult crisis situations." Trump's pivot toward Russia has deeply worried many of Washington's traditional European allies who fear Washington could turn its back on Europe. Patrushev is a former KGB agent from St Petersburg, where Vladimir Putin was also born. He said that Russia would be ready to resume its cooperation with the U.S. on the Arctic. (Reporting and editing by Guy Faulconbridge; reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin)
-
Phillips 66 takes aim at Elliott for Citgo's conflict of interest during board fight
Phillips 66 wrote in a Monday letter that activist investor Elliott Investment Management must abandon its efforts to split up the energy company Phillips 66, as it has a conflict of interest with a separate attempt to buy one of Phillips 66's competitors. This salvo is part of a bitter spat that will reach a boiling point at a shareholders meeting next month. Phillips 66 argued against Elliott's thesis of break-up in the letter by claiming that the investment firm had a conflict due to its separate attempts to purchase Citgo Petroleum. Citgo's parent is being sold through a court-supervised public auction. The court re-ran the auction after creditor challenges. Gregory Goff, CEO of Amber Energy, said that he bought a stake in Phillips 66 on April 9. He also backed Elliott’s campaign. Phillips 66 wrote in a letter on Monday that "this conflict is concerning, because Amber Energy executives actively support Elliott's cause to undermine Phillips 66’s strategy." Citgo, the seventh-largest refiner in the United States, is owned by Phillips 66. A Elliott spokesperson responded to a comment request by pointing to a regulatory filing dated April 10. The document stated that Goff’s work with Elliott was "hidden to no one and in no manner represents a conflict, diminishes his independence of views, or impairs its ability to help Phillips 66 grow into a stronger, valuable company". Elliott has nominated four directors for the May 21, 2018 meeting. This is part of a larger campaign, which also includes urging Phillips 66's to sell its midstream division or consider spinning it off and to divest other assets in order to concentrate on its refining operations and increase its share price. Elliott announced that it had invested more than $2.5billion in Phillips 66. This is the second attempt by the investment firm to push for change at Phillips 66. A first effort in early 2024 ended with the addition of a company board member who was endorsed by Elliott. (Reporting from David French in New York, Editing by Leslie Adler & Jan Harvey)
-
US Supreme Court rejects CSX's bid to revive antitrust lawsuit against Norfolk Southern
The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear the freight rail giant CSX’s bid to revive an antitrust suit accusing Norfolk Southern of restricting illegally access to a major East Coast terminal in Virginia. CSX lost hundreds of millions in profits. The Justices rejected an appeal from CSX against a ruling by a lower court last year that said the Jacksonville, Florida based company had sued too late and missed a four-year window for bringing claims under U.S. Antitrust Law. CSX argued that the statute of limitation should not apply to its lawsuit. CSX filed a lawsuit against Norfolk Southern in Virginia in 2018. The court accused the rival shipper, Norfolk Southern, of conspiring to charge excessive fees for services at Virginia’s Norfolk International Terminals - one of the East Coast's most important terminals. Norfolk Terminal is used by large international container ships to unload cargo on trains and trucks bound for inland destinations. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line is a small railroad, majority owned by Norfolk Southern, that provides track and "switching services" at the terminal. CSX doesn't own the tracks at docks, so it has to pay for access. The suit alleged that Norfolk Southern, Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line and Norfolk Southern in 2009 had set a $210 track rate per railcar that is still in effect today. According to the CSX suit, Norfolk Southern's advantage allowed it to artificially raise prices for ocean carriers who rely on Norfolk terminal. CSX claims it is prohibited from entering profitable contracts with ocean carriers. CSX stated that Norfolk Southern's practice to allegedly overcharge for terminal access continued each day it was in place. Therefore, the four-year statute should not have barred the filing of a lawsuit. Richmond, Virginia's 4th U.S. In 2024, the Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a court's dismissal of CSX lawsuit. The 4th Circuit ruled that Norfolk Southern's rail charges did not "inflict any new harm causing a new injury to CSX in the limitations period." In its appeal to Supreme Court, CSX claimed that the 4th Circuit decision created an immunity shield which allows Norfolk Southern to sidestep competition at their terminal in Norfolk. Norfolk Southern, in its submission to the Supreme Court said CSX had "sat on their hands" for 9 years before filing a suit. Norfolk Southern stated that the 4th Circuit correctly determined that the date 2009 when the rate was established "was outside of the statutes of limitations and that maintaining this rate was an inaction which did not retrigger statutes of limitations on a day-to-day basis."
-
Gulf issuers are planning more debt sales despite recent market turmoil.
Sources say Gulf issuers are working on bond offerings including Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund worth $925 billion. They have braved the debt markets in spite of recent turmoil caused by President Donald Trump's policies regarding tariffs. Investors are struggling to determine where Trump's policies will lead. The markets have been volatile ever since Trump announced his sweeping tariffs in April, even though he has rolled back most of them. Two sources who are directly involved in the matter have confirmed that Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund is looking to raise $1.5 billion to $2 billion through a sukuk or Islamic bond over the next few weeks. The fund has raised more than $11 billion in this year. The kingdom is under increasing pressure to increase debt or reduce spending following a drop in crude oil prices that threatens to wipe out tens billions of dollars. Zeina Rizk is co-head fixed income at Amwal Capital Partners. She said that the Middle East's main concern was oil prices. However, both corporations and governments had very strong fundamentals. Reserves were increasing, and everything was going well. Two sources have said that Abu Dhabi Ports Company plans to raise $2 billion over the next few weeks. One source said that Masdar, a renewable energy company, aims to raise $1 billion through a green bond. This was confirmed by another person. Sources added that plans are not finalised. PIF has declined to comment. AD Ports, Masdar and PIF were not available for immediate comment. In recent years, state-owned companies in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates raised debt to finance an acquisition spree abroad. This was part of government mandates that sought to create national champions and diversify the economies. The recent turmoil on the bond market means that issuers will face higher borrowing rates. Rizk stated that she is not worried as long as the markets remain relatively stable, like they did last week. She said that the launch by Mashreq of a $500-million sukuk in Dubai last week is a good indication. Sources said that Saudi Arabia's Banque Saudi Fransi also plans to raise money this week through a bond above the benchmark. Saudi National Bank raised $750m through a dollar bond issued in Taiwan. BSF did not respond to a request for comment immediately. Saudi Arabian banks have played a key role in the financing of mega-projects like NEOM, Qiddiya, and Red Sea Projects, which collectively required hundreds of billions in funding. Fitch predicts a credit growth in the Saudi banking sector of 12-14% by 2025. The lending growth will continue to exceed deposits, further increasing the deposit gap that was predicted at 0.3 trillion Riyals ($79.96billion) in 2024. $1 = 3.7517 Riyals (Reporting and editing by Federico Maccioni, Hadeel al Sayegh)
-
Dollar weakness and resilient Chinese demand are driving iron ore prices higher.
Iron ore prices saw a slight decline on Monday. Prices were supported by a near-term demand for ore and weakened U.S. dollars, which outweighed ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. The May contract for the most traded iron ore on China's Dalian Commodity Exchange closed at 715.5 Yuan ($98.15), a 1.27 percent increase. As of 0707 GMT, the benchmark May iron ore traded on Singapore Exchange was 1.69 % higher at $99,15 per ton. In a recent note, Hexun Futures said that the hot metal demand was strong and production at an all-time high. Iron ore demand is usually gauged by the hot metal production. Mysteel, a consultancy, said in a report that "production among China's independent EAF steelmakers has now increased for 10 straight weeks." A weaker dollar also helped to support prices. The U.S. currency fell to a 3-year low on Monday, 98.246 versus a basket. Dollar-denominated goods are cheaper for holders of currencies other than the dollar. Last week, U.S. president Donald Trump expressed optimism that both countries could come to an agreement. China warned against a wider economic deal with the U.S. on its cost, increasing its rhetoric amid a trade war that has spiraled out of control between the two world's largest economies. Coking coal and coke, which are used to make steel, have both gained in value, rising by 1.27% and 1.25 %, respectively. The benchmark steel prices on the Shanghai Futures Exchange were flat. Hot-rolled coils were up by 0.69% and rebar was up around 0.8%, while stainless steel traded flat. $1 = 7.2900 Chinese Yuan (Reporting and editing by Janane Venkatraman, Mrigank Dhaniwala).
Taiwan to raise electricity rates for 2nd time this year
Taiwan will raise electrical energy prices by approximately 12.5% for large commercial users to help staunch losses for the island's staterun power company, though the majority of homes and small businesses will see no hike, the economy ministry said on Monday.
The government has actually been attempting to include price rises throughout the board for consumers to assist restrict the effect of inflation, including for energy. It currently raised power prices in April.
The electricity rate increase will enter into impact on Oct. 16, the ministry stated, including that prices would still be lower than in Japan or South Korea.
Taiwan's state refiner, CPC Corp, has been keeping fuel and gas prices artificially low for customers regardless of prices of the raw products increasing internationally due to the impact of the Russian intrusion of Ukraine.
That has actually produced large losses for both CPC Corp and state-run power utility Taipower, the latter of which has reported built up losses of T$ 386.2 billion ($ 12.18 billion). since the end of last year, according to the economy ministry.
At present, Taipower suffers a loss of T$ 0.4 for every single system. of electrical power sold, which should be reasonably and slowly. shown in electricity tariffs to allow the company to. continue to develop and provide electricity stably, the ministry. said in a statement.
The federal government has consistently said that Taiwan's energy. rates for customers are currently among the lowest on the planet.
(source: Reuters)