Latest News
-
Father of sailor on US aircraft carrier released from immigration detention
A Nicaraguan immigrant was taken into custody by the?U.S. His family reported that Border Patrol agents released his son, who was a U.S. Navy Sailor and was deployed at sea on an aircraft carrier in the U.S. - Israel war against Iran. Three days after Joshua Aviles made public his father's arrest and the pain he felt while serving his country, his family announced on Facebook that Luis Manuel Aviles Roa was released. Joshua Aviles wrote on Facebook that his father had been detained by immigration officials despite possessing a driver's licence, Social Security card, and work permit. He said his dad was waiting for a "green" card, which would grant him legal permanent U.S. residency. The sailor wrote: "I have been on deployment for more than nine months in the Middle East, aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. I am fighting for a nation that has given me everything." "I don’t know how to continue working 12-plus-hour days when my dad is?somewhere, possibly being treated as a criminal." According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Border Patrol agents arrested a sailor’s father following a traffic stop in Key West. DHS, the parent agency of Border Patrol, stated that Luis Manuel Aviles Roa entered the U.S. in an illegal manner and would remain at Immigration and Customs Enforcement's detention facility pending removal procedures. In a statement released on Sunday, the DHS stated that "having a family member serving in the military does not give you a pass to break our nation's law." A post on the son's account of Facebook said: "Luis was released to his family." It added, "We appreciate all the support for both Luis and Josh during this situation." The father's new status was not explained. The DHS and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Separate news reports have highlighted the challenges that the crew of the Abraham Lincoln faced during its long deployment to the Middle East for the Iran War, after not having made a port call in over 200 days. Democratic lawmakers claim that the aircraft carrier set a record for the longest period of time at sea. The issue gained national attention when sailors' families expressed concerns over the worsening conditions aboard the warship. (Reporting and writing by Kanishka Sing in Washington; Additional reporting by Steve Gorman, Los Angeles; Editing done by Thomas Derpinghaus).
-
Sources say RPT-Air India is seeking $1.5 billion in compensation from Tata and Singapore Air, as its losses continue to mount.
Air India wants 'about $1.5 billion of fresh equity from its owners Tata Sons & Singapore Airlines. This comes months after Air India posted a record-breaking annual loss. This would be the largest request for funding from Air India made public since Tata acquired control of the former government-owned carrier in 2020. The letter highlights the challenges that the airline faces as it undergoes a multibillion-dollar overhaul, including refurbishment of the existing fleet. In the fiscal year ending March, the carrier and Air India Express' budget unit posted combined losses of 2,33 billion dollars. This is more than twice the losses from the previous year. Singapore Airlines has also suffered from the losses. Air India is looking for the money immediately. However, the infusion will likely happen in several tranches. Singapore Airlines will need to pay its share of the infusion to make the investment happen, according to one source. The two people stated that the company is looking for funding in the form of new equity. The two people said that discussions are still ongoing and there has not been a decision made on the request. They declined to be identified as they weren't authorised to speak publicly about the matter. Air India and Tata Sons have not responded to any requests for comments. Singapore Airlines, who owns about 25% of Air India said that it worked closely with Tata Sons in order to support Air India’s transformation programme but refused to comment on its finances. AIR INDIA'S TURNAROUND EFFORT Air India was also affected by the ban on Indian carriers flying in Pakistani airspace, the disruptions caused to its international network due to the U.S./Israeli war against Iran, and the fallout from a fatal crash that occurred last year. Tata Sons Chairman N. Chandrasekaran is preparing to step down from his position in February after months of disagreements with the group's charitable trust over Air India's losses. Chandrasekaran said that Air India's turnaround may take up to 10 years. He cited the persistent disruptions in the supply chain and the need for the airline to revamp its legacy systems, culture, and fleet. Air India is delaying the delivery of hundreds of aircraft ordered from Airbus and Boeing, as Tata pressures it to reduce costs and record losses. One of the sources said that Air India would continue to require capital infusions over the next few years. (Reporting and editing by Emelia Sithole Matarise; Abhijith Kalra, Aditya Kahlra)
-
Judge criticizes US Postal Service for mail-in voting rules but will not block them
The U.S. A federal judge declined on Tuesday to block the?final rule' that was issued by the U.S. Postal Service?adopted a?final rule?that President Donald Trump?directed?that would?tighten the requirements for mail-invoting, but she still concluded that the agency violated a judge's order by issuing the ruling. U.S. district judge Indira Talwani ruled in Boston a day after U.S. Supreme Court lifted her two court orders that prevented USPS implementing the executive order Trump had signed targeting mail-in votes. USPS is still unable to fulfill Trump's directive despite these rulings. Various challenges to the executive order are still being played out in federal court, so the fate of this measure remains uncertain. USPS and plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. These legal battles are occurring less than three months from the November midterm elections in which control of Congress will be at stake. The fate of the rule could determine if new voting requirements will be required this fall for tens of millions of Americans who rely on mail-in balloting. Trump signed the executive order in march after calling for years to tighten the rules of voting by mail. He also pushed the false claim that the reason he lost the 2020 election was due to widespread voter fraud. According to the U.S. Constitution, the states have the responsibility of administering federal election. Talwani issued rulings on two separate cases that blocked implementation of Trump’s order. First, in a case brought by 23 states largely led by Democrats - the case addressed by the Supreme Court - and later in a suit by voting rights organizations including the League of Women Voters. The Supreme Court with its conservative majority of 6-3 put on hold one of these decisions, saying that a challenge from Democratic-led states was premature, as courts review final rules and not proposed rules. The injunction that the voting rights groups had obtained was still in effect even after the Supreme Court's ruling. They urged Talwani, however, to conclude USPS violated the injunction when it released the final version of the rule implementing Trump's order on Friday. This rule would require that states provide USPS lists of voters who have received mailed ballots, and unique barcodes on outbound and returned ballot mail envelopes. Talwani - a Democrat appointed by Barack Obama - agreed on Tuesday, saying that USPS "feigned" compliance with her ruling, and had ignored 'her explicit directive not to initiate or complete rulemaking to comply with Trump's executive orders. She said, however, that since USPS has acknowledged that it cannot implement the rule until?her injunction is lifted, she will not block it at this time. She said that the violation "may end up benefiting Plaintiffs," since the voting rights groups can challenge a "final rule" instead of one they might draft. California and Democratic Party arms have announced separate plans to continue challenging Trump’s executive order. (Reporting and editing by Franklin Paul, Deepa Babington, and Nate Raymond from Boston)
-
US FAA relocates antenna after Marine One Safety Incident
On Tuesday, the?head of Federal Aviation Administration announced that an antenna had been relocated and procedures changed after a military helicopter carrying President Donald Trump came too close to a passenger jet departing Reagan Washington National Airport. The incident on August 4 raised serious concerns about the reason why the passenger plane was allowed to leave while Marine One was near, at a time commercial traffic would normally be halted. After an aviation event, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford assured reporters that?the issue of communication had been resolved. The National Transportation Safety Board investigates the incident. After a crash in January 2025 between a military heli and a commercial plane that resulted in the deaths of 67 people the FAA banned mixed jet and helicopter traffic around the airport. Congress granted FAA $12.5 Billion last year for the replacement of outdated air traffic control telecom infrastructure and radar surveillance systems. This was after a number of failures, including major outages that affected Newark and Washington traffic and a failure in 2023 of an FAA System which forced a short nationwide ground stop. Bedford, who asked Congress for an additional $10 billion, stated that the FAA "is already starting to delay phase 2 and phase 3 because of a lack of funding." We will fail to modernize if we do not get funding to modernize the data architecture, and the operating platform. As part of an $875 million 12-year contract with Air Space Intelligence, the FAA will deploy a new system named SMART in order to reduce congestion. The FAA will launch SMART as a test mode on Sept. 14, and it is working with a number of commercial airlines to "start testing the 'predictive analytics, to see if we can actually achieve what we think they are capable of." The FAA has been struggling to address congestion for years due to rising demand, runway construction and a lack of air traffic controllers. In April, the agency told airlines to reduce 300 flights daily at Chicago O'Hare, citing concerns about congestion. It has now extended these cuts until October 20, 2027. (Reporting and editing by Nick Zieminski, David Shepardson)
-
Bids for the Panama Canal Transit Auction exceed $1 million as demand soars
The authority of the Panama Canal?said that some vessels paid more than $1,000,000 at an 'auction' to secure transit slots. They cited a shift in global trade demand and supply. Panama Canal Authority (ACP), said that the high bids are due to temporary fluctuations in the market, and not an increase in tariffs set by the waterway. According to the authority, while median auction prices between October and January averaged around $55,000, high demand in recent months has driven median prices up by three times. The?ACP stated that "Auction prices?are determined by a number of factors, such as each client's commercial priorities and urgency, as well as the overall supply and demand conditions." The canal will limit daily transits to 34 vessels beginning Sept. 4 and then tighten the limit on Sept. 15 to 32. The Panama Canal is a gravity-fed system that relies on the freshwater of the Gatun Lake and Alajuela Lake. El Nino has reduced the seasonal rainfall required to refill?these reservoirs. This has forced?the authority? to restrict traffic. Some shippers are rerouting their ships around Africa's Cape?of Good Hope to avoid delays and high auction fees. In August, roughly half of U.S. LNG carriers headed for Asia took the Cape route. This extended a typical journey from Houston to Japan by 45 days. Reporting by Elida Moroe and Marianna Paraga, Writing by Natalia Siniawski and Editing by Inigo Alexandra
-
SpaceX will build Starship rocket facility in Louisiana
SpaceX announced that it will 'build a Starship Launch Site in Southern Louisiana' as part of a deal with the state governor. The company plans to begin construction on its fourth spaceport by next year. The site will be called Starbase, Louisiana and cover 125,000 acres (50,585 hectares). It is intended to expand Starship launch operations beyond South Texas. SpaceX revealed?the plans at a?large?event that featured Governor Jeff Landry, and other senior state officials. SpaceX said that the?coastal marshland will be more than eight-times larger than Manhattan and will serve as a "selfsustaining spaceport". It will have "propellant generation, power generation capabilities, deep-water ship-building, vehicle processing facilities, an airport, and deep-water shipping capability," SpaceX explained. Landry called the deal "an inflection point" for Louisiana. This project is more than just steel, technology and capital. This project represents jobs for our families. It represents a boost for our communities and protection for our coastline. SpaceX has been launching rockets for many years from Cape Canaveral in Florida, Vandenberg Space Force Base, California, and Starbase, a company town in South Texas, where it conducts its Starship test-launches and development. (Reporting and editing by Mark Porter, Rod Nickel, and Joey Roulette)
-
Supreme Court gives Trump's order to mail in ballots a boost, but legal battles continue
A federal judge has blocked the implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order that restricts the use of mail-in votes ahead of the November midterm elections. Monday, the?U.S. The Supreme Court lifted the judicial order and gave him a victory, but there are still other challenges. What is the Executive Order? The order, issued in March, directed that the Department of Homeland Security compile and send to each state a list of U.S. Citizens eligible to vote, and that the Justice Department investigate and possibly prosecute state and local officials who give ballots to those deemed to be "not eligible" for federal elections. The U.S. Postal Service must?deliver only ballots to voters who are on the approved mail-in voter list of each state. How did the legal challenges play out? California, along with a grouping of 22 states, and Washington, D.C., filed a lawsuit to stop Trump's directive, claiming that it would lead to confusion and disenfranchise many voters before the midterm elections. In June, U.S. district judge Indira Talwani blocked this order from being implemented in these states. She found that the President lacked authority to order any changes to the way states administer federal election, and that federal agencies lacked the ability to compile "accurate" citizen lists for every state. What did the Supreme Court do? The Supreme Court ruled that the state's legal claims are premature, and they have not suffered any concrete harm. The court's ruling left open the possibility of a new legal challenge once the federal agencies have finalized how they plan to implement Trump's orders. The court's decision does not mean, however, that the measures taken by the government in order to implement the orders will be legal. The majority decision said that time will tell. Three liberal justices of the court dissented. WHAT'S THE IMPACT ON MAIL-IN VOTING? As another injunction, issued by Talwani last August in a different case that prevents the USPS to implement Trump's orders remains in effect, it is unclear what impact this will have. The Supreme Court's ruling did not change that judicial order. The USPS published a final rule Friday, despite the court orders, to implement Trump's directive regarding mail-in voting. The rule requires that states provide the USPS with a list of recipients for mail-in ballots, and that all envelopes used to send and receive ballots have unique barcodes. According to the administration, the USPS will check whether envelopes comply with the rules, but it won't be responsible for determining whether voters are eligible to cast ballots. The rule has already been challenged in court by Judge Talwani. How did the White House and Democrats react? California Governor Gavin Newsom is a Democrat who has promised to take further legal action. "The Supreme Court has just allowed the Trump administration to move forward (for the moment) with its plan of disenfranchising voters across the nation. California will "sue AGAIN" to stop these Orwellian laws from being implemented, he stated in a press release. White House spokesperson Lauren Bis called the decision a victory for election security. "These measures are common sense and protect the security of ballots sent by mail, ensuring that only Americans elect American leaders." Bis stated that this administration would continue to follow the lawful agenda on which President Trump was elected, including the safety and security our elections. (Reporting and editing by Michael Learmonth, Lisa Shumaker, Nate Raymond. Additional reporting by Andrew Chung.
-
United CEO anticipates gradual fare increases by 2027, as demand remains strong
Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines, said that he expected airfares to increase gradually in the first six months of 2027 but by less than they did this year due to a strong travel demand. "I believe you will still see gradual increases to fares." Kirby told journalists that the jump was not as large as it had been this year. These comments highlight the continued strength of the travel market, despite rising fares and broader economic uncertainty. Kirby stated that United has not seen a decline in demand, and they expect?that strength will help them recover higher fuel prices in the fourth quarter 2026. According to the Labor Department's statistics, U.S. airlines fares increased by?25.5% from a year ago in July. They were also nearly 25% higher than average between April and July. Kirby said, however, that airfares are still about 13% lower than pre-pandemic prices after inflation is taken into account and they're moving back to what he called more normal levels. He said, "We are going to return to a sort of normalized fare where airlines can be profitably enough to reinvest." Kirby, when asked about the?demand during geopolitical unrest and extreme heat in Europe's regions, said that there had been no significant decline. He said that there hasn't been even a "blip" in the demand. "Demand across the board is extremely strong." A STRONG DEMAND HELPS? OFFSET FUEL PRSURE Kirby also correlated United's ability recover higher fuel prices with the strength of demand. Kirby, when asked if United could still recover the higher costs of jet fuel at $4 per gallon, pointed out that demand was strong but did not give a forecast. He said, "We'll have to see." But given the strength of demand, I still think we will recover 100% in the fourth quarter. Kirby said that aircraft deliveries are "back on track" after United's supply-chain issues proved to be worse than it had expected when placing large aircraft orders years ago. Reporting by Doyinsola Oladipo, Writing by Rajesh Kumar Singh, Editing by Nick Zieminski
How US freight rail became dirtier than coal-fired power plants
BNSF Railways, a crown jewel of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, claims to be an environmental leader within the U.S. railway industry, with the cleanest fleet of locomotives in North America.
In its latest sustainability report, BNSF urges people to "think green" when they see the steel wheels of orange locomotives and freight cars moving along steel rails.
The company has the biggest share in an industry with a serious pollution problem. According to government data, U.S. railroads emit more nitrogen oxides, the main component of smog than all of the coal-fired plants combined.
U.S. railways produced together about 485,000 tonnes of nitrogen oxides in 2024, compared with 452,000 tonnes emitted by U.S. power plants that burn coal, according to a calculation based on reported annual fuel consumption multiplied the EPA’s 2023 average weighted emission rates.
BNSF is the largest freight railroad in the United States. It accounts for a third of that total and will produce 161,500 tonnes of smog causing nitrogen oxide by 2024. "We don't dispute your number. BNSF stated in an email that it is the largest Class I railroad based on volume. Morningstar railroad analyst Greggory Warren believes that BNSF’s position as the largest rail company in the United States, and its profitability will be challenged if a $85 billion merger of Union Pacific with Norfolk Southern is approved by regulators. This would create the U.S.’s first coast-to-coast rail freight operator.
Four industry experts agreed that the calculations were fair. Class I railroads produce 80% of all NOx tonnes produced in the industry. Class I refers to six major railroads that generate more than $1 billion annually.
BNSF has not reported on its share of the recent NOx emission performance of the rail industry, or the factors that are driving the high levels of pollution.
According to the EPA’s Co-Benefits Risk Assessment Tool, railroad locomotive pollution costs the United States $48 billion annually in healthcare costs. It also causes 3,100 premature deaths.
Bill Magavern is the policy director for Coalition for Clean Air in California, an organization that promotes public health. He said that the EPA should force railroads to upgrade their fleets.
The EPA declined comment on rail pollution specifically for this article, but stated: "The Trump EPA has a commitment to enhancing its ability to provide clean air, land, and water for all Americans."
AGGING FREIGHT LOCOS
Railroads' poor performance in terms of emissions is mainly due to the fact they have stopped replacing their aging locomotive fleet. According to EPA reports and industry reports, the average age of U.S. trains is 28 years old, compared to 20 years in 2009.
This is a problem, because the federal emission?standards are based on the age of the locomotives. The oldest locomotives have the lowest limits.
The U.S. rail freight industry has been slow to buy new locomotives because there is no requirement for retiring old ones. This fear of new regulations that could be implemented by future administrations may have exacerbated the situation.
Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat Senator, claims that railroads are no longer interested in innovation. Markey stated that the air pollution standards of railroads have a loophole the size of an engine, which is being used by companies to keep dirty, old trains on tracks.
Rail industry claims that rail is the most environmentally friendly option to transport freight on land. They cite data from the U.S. Department of Transportation. A locomotive can transport a ton (about 500 miles) of freight on one gallon of gasoline, which is up to three or four times as efficient as trucks.
The Association of American Railroads also said that it was unfair to compare rail with?powerplants, saying locomotives had little choice but diesel. The power plants in question have many other options to generate electricity - hydropower, wind, coal, natural gases, etc. The rail industry is different, the trade group said.
BNSF has said that it will reduce its emissions by improving efficiency and technology. It also stands behind its claim of having the cleanest fleet based on its number of modern locomotives.
BNSF reported that 360 of the 6,780 locomotives it owns are modern locomotives, Tier 4 engines, which meet the strictest federal emission standards. This is the largest number in the entire industry.
Surface Transportation Board data shows that only 5% of the total fleet is in use or stored. Analysts and CN press release about new locomotives claim that Canadian National's rival has about 300 Tier 4 engines, which make up 27% of their total fleet. BNSF's closest competitors operate about 270 Tier 4 locomotives at Union Pacific, and about 225 at CSX Corp. EPA data and company press releases, as well as trade industry reports, show that there are about 80 Tier 4 locomotives at Norfolk Southern and 270 at Union Pacific.
BNSF spent 394 million dollars on?165 rebuilt and new locomotives between 2020 and 2024. This was a 69% decrease from the previous five years, when the company spent $1.26billion on 558 engines. According to BNSF's annual reports filed to the U.S., the replacement of aging locomotives--some lasting as long as 40 years-slowed down sharply. Surface Transportation Board.
CLEANEST FEET?
BNSF's large size is not the only reason for its high emissions.
According to statistics submitted by the U.S. Department of Transportation, BNSF has the lowest fuel efficiency amongst the six largest railroads in the United States. Surface Transportation Board is the industry's economic regulator.
BNSF used 1.14 gallons per ton of weight moved over 1,000 miles in 2024. This industry metric is called a gross-ton mile. Union Pacific used 1.08 gallons of diesel to move the same amount of weight over the same distance. The most efficient railroad, Canadian National, consumed 0.88 gallons.
According to railroad industry analysts interviewed, BNSF's fuel efficiency is low because it transports more intermodal cargo than its peers.
The high-priority containers must move faster than normal freight, as they are usually more time-sensitive. This is according to Jason Kuehn a vice president and railroad analyst at the consulting firm Oliver Wyman.
BNSF will ship 5.3 million intermodal shipments in 2024. This is nearly 60% more than the No. According to the company's disclosures, Union Pacific is ranked No. 2.
Analysts say BNSF is likely to be less efficient due to its limited use of precision-scheduled railing. This industry practice aims at reducing fuel consumption and costs by using longer trains, fewer engines, and a shorter idle time. Fuel efficiency is also affected by mountainous terrain, and the congestion of a railroad network.
BNSF refused to comment on why it has a relatively low fuel efficiency, but maintained that it was an environmental leader 'in the industry based upon its adoption of the new locomotives which allows it to burn fuel cleaner.
The company said that it had the "cleanest fleet" of locomotives and platform locomotives.
It refused to give details about its fleet-wide emission intensity and could not verify whether it was better than competitors.
According to the EPA, Tier 4 locomotives reduce NOx by up to 80% compared with Tier 3 models.
Fear of Regulation
Railroads have stopped investing in new locomotives because of new regulations, including zero-emissions standard proposed by California. They are concerned that these new rules could make them obsolete.
Roger Nober, former chief legal officer of BNSF and director of George Washington University’s Regulatory Studies Center, said: "These locomotives are 40-45 years old, but you say they won't be able use them because we will have zero emissions."
"Railroads do not see this as an efficient use for their capital."
In 2008, EPA hoped that it could clean up the freight rail industry by setting higher standards for new locomotives. These standards included new Tier 3 models and Tier 4 models. Rail companies have slowed their purchase of new locomotives in order to encourage the replacement of older locomotives.
The EPA predicted in 2008 that by 2025, at least 30 percent of freight locomotives will be operating within the most stringent limits. According to the EPA, only 6.5% out of 19,303 locomotives that are currently active and operated by the six major railroads will meet this limit in 2023.
According to the U.S. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, American railroads had replaced their locomotives annually at a rate of 4% before 2008. By 2024 the replacement rate for the railroad industry had fallen to 0.5% annually.
Neither BNSF, nor its competitors provide precise data about the model year of?active locomotives within their national fleets.
The industry's biggest battle has been against California's proposed emission standard. This would have prohibited locomotives older than 22 years from operating within the state and required that all locomotives be zero-emissions in 2035.
California, with its large market size, can set a standard for the nation.
According to officials at the California Air Resources Board, the stricter regulations would reduce 7,400 tons diesel soot and 386,000 tons NOx by 2050. They also estimate that the cancer risk of those who live near rail operations could be reduced by 90%.
Rail officials claim that the bill would also have prohibited 65% of freight locomotives in operation from operating within the state.
California retracted the proposal a week before Donald Trump was inaugurated as U.S. President in January.
Trump is a frequent critic and would be expected to block this initiative by refusing California the waiver needed to establish state pollution regulations that are stricter than federal ones.
House Republicans introduced in May the Locomotives Act. This would prevent California from receiving such waivers. The bill was referred to Energy and Commerce Committee.
FIGHTING GREEN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Rail industry lobbyists have also been very active in opposing the adoption of new technologies. BNSF informed the EPA at a public meeting last year that its test of a battery electric locomotive did not deliver enough power to transport tons of freight across long distances.
John Lovenburg said that the battery contained two megawatts usable energy. This is about 1/40th the energy needed for locomotives that haul line-haul freight.
Alex Scott, professor of supply-chain management at the University of Tennessee, says that electric locomotives can be used for short routes, replacing diesel locomotives, and in switch yards. However, for longer distances, they are limited by their battery weight.
In the United States, and in other parts of world, battery-electric locomotives do not exist. In China, India, and Russia the majority of freight locomotives are powered by overhead electric lines or catenary system.
According to an Association of American Railroads study from February 2025, electrifying 139,000 miles of track by six major railroads in North America could cost over $1.1 trillion.
Scott explained that the railroad industry was slow to adapt new technologies because, if there are problems, they're not only yours. You're creating issues for your customers as well as other railroads, because they all share the same track.
(source: Reuters)