Latest News
-
Election in Russia sparks a dispute with Moldova about voting in a separatist region
The Russian parliamentary elections have sparked a diplomatic dispute with Moldova, which has objected to the Kremlin’s plan to open 15 voting stations for Russians in the separatist Transdniestria Region. Moscow has confirmed that '220,000 residents' of pro-Russian Transdniestria (a small sliver which separated from Moldova at the end the Soviet regime in 1990) hold Russian passports, and have the right to vote in Sunday's election for the State Duma. Moldova's pro Western government wants to join the European Union by 2030, and denounces Kremlin war in Ukraine. It says that Russians can vote only at the Russian Embassy in Chisinau. It disputes the 220,000 figure, and opposes all polling stations in Transdniestria where it does not have control over the procedures. The Moldovan authorities have branded the Kremlin’s 15 planned voting stations as “unacceptable and hostile” and summoned Russian Ambassador Oleg Ozerov for questioning at the Foreign Ministry. Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, retorted that Moldova should drop its objections and stop actions which "run counter to democracy, international law and good sense". Mihail Popsoi, Moldova's Foreign Minister, told Moscow to "not interfere with Moldova's plans" for a peaceful reintegration of the separatist territory. The last Russian parliamentary election was held in 2021. Authorities in Moscow opened 27 voting stations in the area and more than 59,000 people voted, with 76.2% of them supporting United Russia, a party that supports Russian President Vladimir Putin. Transdniestria has not been recognised internationally,?not by Moscow either, but a Russian contingent of about 1,500 troops that Russia describes sometimes as peacekeepers remains there, despite Moldova's demands for them to leave.
-
Coast guard: China vessel rams Philippine vessel on a refuelling mission
The Philippine Coast Guard said that a China Coast Guard vessel had rammed a Philippine boat on a refueling trip in the South China Sea on Friday. This was the latest incident between the two nations in disputed waters. The BRP Datu Magat Salamat, a vessel of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFA), was en route to provide fuel to Filipino fisherman about 54 nautical mile off the coasts of Palawan Province. The coast guard reported that a China Coast Guard vessel made contact with a Philippine ship and damaged the railings and deck structure of the vessel. However, no one was injured, according to the coastguard. In a statement, it stated that "the?China Coast Guard deliberately ran a civilian government ship on a humanitarian mission and livelihood mission." The PCG released a video showing crew members shouting, "brace yourself for impact!" Moments before the collision which took place at 0313 GMT, 11:13 am. After the collision, photos showed bent and 'detached railings and damaged metal'supports. Debris was scattered on the deck. In a press release, the China Coast Guard stated that they conducted law enforcement operations near Sabina Shoal, Friday, after a Philippine vessel "disregarded multiple solemn warnings and deliberately changed its course, suddenly accelerating to cut across our vessel's bow." The Chinese boat was said to have operated professionally, and the collision blamed on the Philippine side. In a Facebook post, US Ambassador Lee Lipton said: "We strongly condemned the China Coast Guard’s deliberate ramming." According to a post on X, the Chinese Embassy in Philippines condemned the US Embassy for'supporting what they called Philippine infringements and provocations in water near Sabina Shoal. Manila accused Beijing in July of firing "water cannon" at government vessels near 'Scarborough Shoal' and hitting a Philippine Navy staff member with a wooden baton on the head during an encounter off the Second Thomas Shoal.
-
Cuba's electric grid collapses once again, plunges island into darkness
Cuba's electrical system collapsed on Friday, leaving millions of people without power and plunging Cuba into darkness. This was due to a US pressure campaign which has prevented oil from reaching Cuba's largest Caribbean island. Authorities said that the failure of high-voltage transmission cables in central Cuba around 2 pm local time was responsible for Friday's collapse. Felix Estrada, a Cuban National Electrical Union official (UNE), said: "Protocols have been put in place for the gradual restoration of system." By late evening power had been restored to a few neighborhoods, mostly around hospitals. However, the rest of Havana was still completely dark, due to cloudy skies and rain. The blackout in the United States, which was at least six partial or complete grid collapses from January onwards, barely registered with a nation that is used to going for long hours, or days, without electricity. The blackout struck as many residents of Havana, the capital city, were already exhausted and without electricity. Yesterday I was without power for 24 hrs. "They turned on the lights for an hour and then the grid collapsed," Frank Lorenzo said, a 23-year-old Havana local looking forward to sweating and slapping at mosquitos. Cuba's decrepit power system, which has suffered from fuel shortages for many years, has now been further strained by the US oil blockade. Since July, the grid has 'collapsed' three times and blackouts spanning 30 hours or longer have been experienced across most of Canada. Human rights experts from the United Nations have condemned the US oil embargo, calling it a violation to international law and warning that Cuba could become a "silent Gaza", as shortages and blackouts continue to grow.
-
After a temporary suspension due to drone activity, flights resume at Luxembourg Airport
Authorities resumed flight operations at Luxembourg Airport on Saturday after suspending them the previous evening due to the discovery of "unauthorized unmanned aerial systems", or drones. The airport, Luxembourg’s only international airport, announced that it had imposed a'suspension' on Friday, as a precautionary measure, to ensure the safety and security of passengers, airline crews, airport staff, and aircraft. The airport did not provide any details about the origin or operator of the drones. Although flights have resumed as scheduled, some 'delays and disruptions' may persist while airlines and airport partners work to restore the normal schedules. Luxair's main hub at Luxembourg Airport, which is the country's main airport, has said that it will continue to monitor the situation in coordination with the relevant authorities.
-
Saudi civil defence sends all-clear after danger warning for capital Riyadh
Saudi civil defense sounded the all-clear on Saturday morning after issuing alerts for potential danger in Riyadh, and Al-Kharj city east of the capital. This was amid a surge of attacks by Iran-aligned Houthis against the Gulf nation. This was the first alert for the capital city since Houthis in neighbouring Yemen intensified attacks on Saudi Arabia. A? Two booms were heard by a journalist in the Olaya district of Riyadh. The alert comes hours after the Houthis’?military spokeswoman said that the?group foiled "criminal efforts" of unspecified nature in the Yemeni Capital Sanaa. She blamed Saudi Arabia for the failure and promised a reaction. Since declaring a blockade on 'Riyadh' in July, the Houthis have launched attacks against Saudi Arabia, with strikes in the Red Sea targeting Saudi vessels. According to the group, which has been able to seize Yemen's entire Red Sea coast in a flash of lightning since last week, the Saudi Air Force has carried out?hundreds? of airstrikes over recent days.
-
US and China discuss cutting tariffs for US LNG before Xi's visit
According to two people who have been briefed about the discussions, the US and China are discussing a proposal to reduce or eliminate 'China's tariffs against American LNG. This is part of a broader agreement on energy and agriculture that could be announced if Chinese President Xi Jinping comes to Washington next week. People said that the?potential?relief of US exports of Liquefied Natural Gas is being discussed along with a larger framework whereby the US and China each would cut tariffs on around $30 billion worth of goods. In February 2025, China increased its tariffs on US LNG by 15% in response to President Donald Trump's duties against Chinese goods. This effectively ended the US-China LNG trading, and the last significant cargoes arrived early in 2025. American LNG producers are looking for new markets to absorb the new export capacity that is being built along the US Gulf Coast. Years of trade tensions have made China, one of the largest LNG markets in the world, less accessible. These?discussions' are part of efforts to stabilise trade ties in advance of a meeting between Trump and Xi on September 24, and they are not finalized, according to the people. The White House nor the Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comments. The American LNG Industry is entering a phase of major expansion. Export capacity will grow by approximately 10 billion cubic feet a day through 2027, as new and expanded installations ramp up. Projects involving Cheniere Energy Venture Global Sempra NextDecade, Exxon Mobil and Venture Global are among those adding capacity. Return of Chinese buyers could?give US gas producers another major destination at a time when geopolitical turmoil is reshaping the global energy flow, possibly helping to underpin demand for those projects that are currently under construction or seeking financing and long term customers. According to estimates and analyses by the industry, of the nearly 100 million metric tonnes of LNG capacity currently under construction in the US 24,5 million metrictons have yet to be contracted to long-term clients. Global LNG FLOWs US LNG cargos, which would have otherwise gone to Asia, were increasingly drawn to Europe after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 disrupted Europe’s access to Russian gas pipelines. As a result of the ongoing conflict between Iran and the US in the Middle East, global energy flows have shifted, as disruptions in supply are increasing the competition for LNG cargoes from Asia. China is the largest LNG -importer in the world, and the US the largest LNG-exporter. This gives the two countries a strong economic incentive to reestablish a trade relationship that was growing rapidly?before tariff disputes. US data shows that after Beijing implemented the tariff on US LNG, US exports to China dropped from 64 vessels to zero in 2025. In 2021 the number of vessels had "reached a new record", reflecting the rapid expansion of US LNG trade to China since large-scale exports began from the Lower 48 States in 2016. US LNG shipments from the US to China dropped to only two vessels during Trump's first term trade dispute with Beijing in 2019, before bouncing back in 2020 and 2021. According to LSEG shipping information, in recent months several US cargoes left the Gulf 'Coast terminals for export have either arrived in China, or are heading there. This suggests that Chinese buyers began to return to the US even though the tariff remained. According to the Energy Information Administration, US LNG exports in the first half 2026 averaged 17,4 bcf/d, up by 23% compared to a year ago.
-
FedEx and Advent-led consortium secures more than 89% of InPost's shares in the takeover offer
InPost, a Polish parcel locker operator, announced on Friday that FedEx International, Advent International as well as other InPost shareholders had offered 89.81% of its shares. InPost?reported in a press release that the minimum acceptance threshold of 80% shares had been reached. The consortium agreed in February to purchase InPost for approximately EUR7.8 Billion ($8.95 Billion)?in a cash-only offer of EUR15.60 per equity share. After the transaction is completed, InPost's shares will be removed from Euronext Amsterdam. It is one of Europe's biggest networks of automated parcel lockers. The company operates in nine countries, including Poland. The company will continue to be known as InPost and keep its headquarters and management structure in Poland. Since 2021, the shares of 'its company have been under pressure due to intense competition in its home market and heavy investment expenditure?to support rapid growth.
-
Major US airlines reject Air China's bid to schedule more US flights
Air China has been criticized by a group of major US airlines for its plans to schedule additional flights between Beijing and New York, Washington, as part of the President Xi Jinping meeting with Donald Trump. Airlines for America, which represents American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, opposed the request. US carriers are effectively prohibited from flying to China from the US eastcoast because they can't access Russian airspace. Chinese carriers, however, have the ability to fly some US flights. US Airlines said that adding two flights to the schedule would allow Chinese carriers to request additional regular flights, and they should be classified a 'charter flight. The US Transportation Department has proposed that in October 2025 Chinese airlines be banned from flying over Russia on routes between the United States and China. They claim the shorter flight times this practice allows puts American carriers at an unfair disadvantage. The proposal was withdrawn after it faced opposition from US agencies. USDOT and an attorney for Air China did not comment immediately. US airlines have long been critical of the decision to let Chinese carriers use Russian airspace to fly on US routes, because it allows them to reduce their flying time. It also burns less fuel and lowers costs. In its filing, released on Friday, the airline group said that Chinese carriers offer "shorter and less expensive routes?to and from China, as well as more economical flights?from and to the United States." In retaliation to Washington's ban on Russian flights over the US in March 2022, after Ukraine invaded, Russia has banned US airlines as well as many other foreign carriers. Chinese airlines are not banned, and they have used this advantage to gain market share over non-Chinese carriers in international routes.
How Biden's Gaza pier project unwinded
The first time President Joe Biden's administration considered buying the U.S. armed force to build a drifting pier off Gaza to deliver help in late 2023, it was put on the backburner.
The United States was under pressure to alleviate the humanitarian crisis in the war-torn Palestinian enclave, which had been worsened by Israel's closure of many land border crossings, and sea deliveries were viewed as a possible service.
U.S. Admiral Christopher Grady, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Personnel and a career Navy surface area warfare officer, told a conference that he was very worried that the sea could end up being too rough for a pier to provide humanitarian help and laid out weather-related risks, a former U.S. authorities and an existing U.S. official said.
It wasn't until early 2024 that the idea showed up again as the scenario in Gaza grew more desperate and aid organizations alerted that mass starvation among Palestinian civilians was looming.
We sort of reached a point where it appeared proper to take more risk due to the fact that the need was so excellent, a former senior Biden administration official said.
The resulting pier objective did not work out.
It included 1,000 U.S. soldiers, provided only a portion of the promised aid at an expense of nearly $230 million, and was from the start beleaguered by bad luck and mistakes, including fire, bad weather condition and dangers on coast from the fighting in between Israel and Hamas.
Biden, after assuring a massive increase in help, acknowledged that the pier had disappointed his goals. I was enthusiastic that would be more successful, he told reporters on July 11.
The internal discussions about the Gaza pier, consisting of discarded alternatives to briefly deploy soldiers to the enclave, have not been previously reported.
The pier objective, which was officially ended recently, was the most controversial of the U.S. military's attempts to help include the fallout from the Israel-Hamas war that appeared on Oct. 7, 2023, and has actually drawn criticism from Biden's Republican critics and numerous present and former help employees.
The effort also underscores the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's battles to bring the conflict to a close, both of which are in focus during his see to Washington today.
The Pentagon referred questions about the pier to remarks made at a July 17 rundown with Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, the deputy leader of U.S. Central Command. In it, Cooper said the mission was a success, delivering the largest quantity of help ever into the Middle East.
Mike Rogers, the Republican who leads the Pentagon's. oversight committee in your house of Representatives, called the. pier a humiliation.
The pier was an ill-conceived political computation by the. Biden administration, Rogers told .
NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND
With alarm rising over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza in. 2023, Curtis Reid, chief of staff at the White Home National. Security Council, was tasked with creating a working group with. various government firms to take a look at ways to increase help. into Gaza.
( It) was an ask for firms to put whatever you got. on the table, the previous senior official said. The Pentagon. then started taking a look at alternatives.
Requested comment, the NSC acknowledged inter-agency. conversations on possible policy choices.
Due to the fact that of this work, we had the ability to advance the delivery. of humanitarian assistance into Gaza, making use of every tool. possible, stated Adrienne Watson, an NSC representative.
When the head of the armed force's Central Command, General. Michael Erik Kurilla, at first briefed Defense Secretary. Lloyd Austin about the pier objective, his very first proposition included. a minimal variety of U.S. soldiers on the ground, briefly, to. attach the pier to the shore, the previous authorities stated.
Austin knew that the White Home was opposed to. releasing U.S. forces to Gaza and asked Kurilla to go back and. rework it, a current U.S. official and the previous authorities said.
Kurilla produced a plan to train Israeli forces to do the. setup of the pier on the shore, the former authorities. added. Israeli forces later carried out the plan. The Israeli. prime minister's workplace and defense ministry referred '. concerns about the pier to the U.S. military.
Kurilla's Central Command declined to discuss the record. A U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of privacy,. rejected the account and said boots on the ground was never a. factor to consider.
Present and former officials explained Central Command as. incredibly positive the pier task would succeed.
CENTCOM and General Kurilla, from Day 1, they were. consistent in stating: 'We can do this,' the previous U.S. official stated.
The first turn of misfortune began April 11, when a fire. broke out in the engine room of the USNS 2nd Lt. John P. Bobo, a. Navy ship transferring part of the pier system to the. Mediterranean.
The team put out the fire but the ship had to reverse to. the United States.
THREE FOOT WAVES
Weather condition was an even larger issue.
An early warning of the difficulties from rough seas came last. summertime, when U.S. troops attempted to set up the pier on an. Australian shore during a military workout.
The sea was too rough, a military officer who straight. dealt with the pier workout told .
In the end, the soldiers could not connect the pier to the. beach itself, and rather brought products ashore utilizing boats to. bridge the gap in between completion of the drifting pier and the. beach.
U.S. officials acknowledge that the Mediterranean weather. was a worry. However they were unprepared for how bad the sea. conditions turned out to be.
The forecast that they had (was) essentially that the sea. state was going to be three or less up till around September,. said one senior U.S. defense official, referring to sea state. three, when waves do not go beyond three feet.
Instead, waves broke the pier simply 9 days after it became. operational on May 16. The damage was so bad that it had to be. relocated to the Israeli port of Ashdod for repair work.
The occurrence would be show the norm, with bad weather condition. keeping the pier inoperative for all but 20 days-- half as long. as it required to bring the system across the sea to Gaza.
While there were no deaths or understood direct attacks on the. pier, three U.S. soldiers suffered non-combat injuries in assistance. of the pier in May, with one medically left in crucial. condition.
OVER-ESTIMATING DISTRIBUTION
Providing the food, shelter and medical care that was. brought onshore through the pier likewise proved more difficult than. expected.
The U.S. military aimed to increase to as many as 150 trucks. a day of help coming off the pier.
However since the pier was just operational for a total of 20. days, the military says it moved an overall of only 19.4 million. pounds of help into Gaza. That would have to do with 480 trucks of help. provided in total from the pier, based upon estimates by the. World Food Programme from earlier this year of weight brought by. a truck.
The United Nations states about 500 truckloads of aid are. needed everyday to deal with the needs of Palestinians in Gaza.
Simply days after the very first deliveries of aid rolled off the. pier in Gaza, crowds overwhelmed trucks and took a few of it.
Israel's killings of 7 World Central Cooking area employees in. April and its usage of an area near the pier as it staged a. hostage rescue healing objective in June also dented the. self-confidence of help companies, on whom the U.S. was relying to. bring the supplies from the coast and distribute to citizens.
A senior U.S. defense authorities acknowledged that aid. delivery showed to be possibly more difficult than the. organizers anticipated.
One previous authorities said Kurilla had actually raised distribution as. an issue early on.
General Kurilla was also really clear about that: 'I can do. my piece of this, and I can do circulation if you task me to do. it,' the former authorities stated.
However that was clearly scoped out of what the job was. Therefore we were reliant on these global companies.
Present and former U.S. officials informed that the. United Nations and help companies themselves were always cool. to the pier.
At a closed-door conference of U.S. officials and aid. companies in Cyprus in March, Sigrid Kaag, the U.N. humanitarian and reconstruction coordinator for Gaza, offered. tacit support for Biden's pier project.
But Kaag worried the UN preference was for land, land,. land, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
The United Nations decreased to talk about the meeting. It. referred to a rundown on Monday where a spokesperson for the. company said that the U.N. appreciated every way of getting. help into Gaza, consisting of the pier, but more gain access to through land. routes is needed.
The hidden concern for aid companies was that Biden,. under pressure from fellow Democrats over Israel's killing of. civilians in Gaza, was pushing a service that would at finest be. a short-term fix and at worst would take pressure off Netanyahu's. federal government to open land routes into Gaza.
Dave Harden, a previous USAID objective director to the West. Bank and Gaza, explained the pier project as humanitarian. theater.
It did ease the pressure, sadly, on having the.
(source: Reuters)