Latest News

Trump will travel to China in the next month to discuss US tariffs

The Supreme Court has overturned Trump's tariffs on imported goods. An official from the White House confirmed the trip Friday, just before the Supreme Court handed Trump a crushing defeat, by overturning'many' of the tariffs that he had used in his global trade war. This included some tariffs against China.

Trump's discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping during an extended trip to Beijing were expected to focus on extending a truce in trade that prevented both countries from increasing tariffs.

RULING RAISES CONCERNS FOR U.S. - CHINA RELATIONS

The Supreme Court's decision has raised new questions about the tense U.S. China relations, which had been stabilized recently after Trump reduced tariffs on Chinese products in exchange for Beijing taking measures, such as cracking down the illicit fentanyl traffic and easing export restrictions for critical minerals.

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) imposes tariffs of 20% on China's exports to the United States. A court ruled that Trump had exceeded the IEEPA. These tariffs were linked to national emergencies relating to fentanyl and trade imbalances.

The other duties on Chinese products, such as those implemented under the legislated trade authority known as Section 301 or Section 232, are still in place.

Trump did not reveal how many tariffs he would reinstate, but at a recent press conference he announced that he was going to impose a 10% tariff on all goods for 150 days.

Trump's trip to China in 2017 was the last by an American president.

Trump told foreign leaders in Washington, DC on Thursday that the China trip was going to be wild. "We must put on the largest display in China's history."

The Chinese embassy in Washington has declined to comment about the dates of this trip. This information was first reported by. Beijing has not confirmed this trip.

TRUMP SEES TRADE IMBALANCE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY

The Trump?administration said that the global tariffs are necessary due to?national emergency related to trade imbalances which have weakened U.S. Manufacturing.

Scott Kennedy, an expert in China economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, says that Trump was already "playing defence" in the trade conflict, due to the effectiveness of Beijing’s threat to cut-off rare earths. He said that the tariff defeat "confirms his weakness" in their eyes. Kennedy stated that Chinese officials are "pleased with the direction in which bilateral relations have moved, where the U.S. has been diminished." They also want to prevent a resurgence of tensions. Trump's trip will be their first face-to-face meeting since a South Korea meeting in October, when they reached a trade truce.

Xi brought up U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan when the two leaders met this month.

China considers democratically-governed Taiwan to be its territory. Taipei rejects this position. Taiwan's main arms supplier, the U.S. is bound by law to give Taiwan the means to defend themselves. It has diplomatic relations with China but also maintains informal ties. Washington approved its largest ever arms sale to Taiwan in December. The weapons included $11.1 billion worth of weapons that were ostensibly used as a defense against a Chinese invasion. Taiwan is expecting more of these?sales.

Xi said he would also consider increasing soybean purchases during the call in February, according to Trump. Trump's major constituency is struggling U.S. Farmers, and China is a top soybean consumer. Analysts predicted on Friday that China might be less inclined to make another large purchase of U.S. soybeans. After the Supreme Court decision, soybeans are now available. Trump justified his hawkish policies from Canada to Greenland to Venezuela as necessary in order to defeat China. However, in recent months he has loosened policy toward Beijing on issues such as tariffs, advanced computer chips and drones.

Trump's global trade war, which he started after his second term in office as president began in January 2025, has alienated many trading partners and allies. The critics argued that by imposing tariffs across the board, Beijing was protected from the tariff barrage. They also argued it reduced the incentives for supply chains to leave China.

Martin Chorzempa is a senior fellow with the Peterson Institute of International Economics. He said that Friday's decision could indirectly increase the pressure on Beijing, if effective tariff rates for other countries, especially in Southeast Asia, drop more than the ones on China.

Chorzempa stated that "compared to other countries, China has a much better-established and more durable legal mechanism" for the majority of tariffs. This makes them less affected by these tariffs than other countries. (Reporting Trevor Hunnicutt, Michael Martina, Additional Reporting Katharine Jackson, Editing Andrei Khalip Colleen Jenkins Rod Nickel Patricia Zengerle;

(source: Reuters)