Latest News

Sources say that the US EPA will withdraw its foundation rules for greenhouse gas regulations

Two sources with knowledge of the discussions said that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to reverse the scientific determination that greenhouse gases endanger the public's health. This will remove the legal basis that supports all major climate regulations.

The reversal of "endangerment findings" would undermine one of the most important federal standards, which had allowed the U.S. combat climate change through regulation of vehicles, industries and energy-producing plants that emit heat trapping greenhouse gases. The sources claimed that without the finding, it would be easier for the EPA to undo major regulations limiting emissions of greenhouse gases. A spokesperson for the EPA said that the agency had sent its proposal to reconsider the endangerment findings to the White House Office of Management and Budget on June 30, and other federal agencies are currently reviewing it.

In an email, an EPA spokesperson stated that the proposal would be made public for public comment and notice once it had been approved by all agencies and signed by Administrator.

The Washington Post was the first to report on this decision.

The International Court of Justice issued a statement on Wednesday.

A landmark advisory opinion

The world faces a "real existential threat" from greenhouse gas emissions, and all countries must work together to reduce them.

Sources said that the proposal would be based on EPA's legal authority, and not its scientific basis, to regulate greenhouse gas emission. Lawyers said it would be hard to challenge the scientific basis for the findings because the evidence is "unambiguous" that humans cause climate change.

It would be an unjustifiable denial of overwhelming scientific evidence and a shocking breach of a clear duty under the law to protect the public. "It would be a national disgrace," said Sean Donahue. He is a lawyer at Donahue Goldberg & Herzog who has represented environmental organizations in cases before Supreme Court.

The United States is currently the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China. The United States is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China.

In its landmark Massachusetts vs. EPA decision in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court said that the EPA had authority under the Clean Air Act, to regulate greenhouse gases emissions. The court also required the agency make a scientific determination on whether these emissions endanger the public's health.

In 2009, under the former president Barack Obama, the EPA issued a conclusion that emissions from motor vehicles contributed to pollution and endangered public health and welfare. The EPA's findings were upheld by several legal challenges, and they influenced subsequent greenhouse gas regulations.

During the first term of President Donald Trump, the EPA did not take any action regarding its endangerment findings because industry expressed concerns. Trump's current administration has been focusing on the endangerment conclusion since its inception.

In January, EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said at his confirmation hearing that the agency has

Authority but not obligation

to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In March, the EPA began a review, following a Trump executive order.

Ross Vought, White House Budget Director, said that the review had been "long overdue," because it led to regulations he claimed were harmful to the economy.

Zeldin announced more than two dozen de-regulatory measures aimed at "

Driving a dagger into the heart

"The climate change religion." Reporting by Valerie Volcovici, Editing by Chizu nomiyama and David Gregorio

(source: Reuters)