Latest News

FAA overtime costs are on the rise as hiring is slow, according to a report

A report released by the National Academies of Sciences on Wednesday revealed that the Federal Aviation Administration has seen its overtime costs for air traffic control increase more than 300 percent since 2013, due to hiring restrictions and an incorrectly allocated workforce.

According to the report, the FAA air traffic controllers in 2024 will have logged 2.2 millions hours of overtime, costing them $200 million. The report also stated that "overtime usage may be due in part to inefficient scheduling by the controllers at the facilities."

Since 2013, the average number of hours worked per air traffic control officer has increased by 308%, or 126 per year.

In the report, it was also stated that despite an increase of 4% in air traffic, controllers spent less time on managing positions.

In a 2024 report, an independent FAA panel that assessed the risks of fatigue among controllers called for mandatory periods of rest after raising "serious concern."

The FAA has only hired two-thirds the number of air traffic controllers that its staffing models call for, as the staffing dropped by 13%.

In many places, controllers are required to work six-day weeks and must work mandatory overtime.

The FAA stated that it would analyze the study, its recommendations, and note it is on schedule to hire at least 2,00 controllers in this year.

The Trump administration is seeking at least $20 billion for modernizing air traffic control. This includes new airport equipment that will prevent near-misses and incentives to increase air traffic controller recruitment and retention.

By 2024, almost a third (32%) of air traffic control centers had fallen below their staffing targets by 10%, and 22% were 15% below. This was due to hiring constraints, which included two government shutdowns as well as the COVID-19 epidemic.

The National Academies' report stated that the FAA "should critically evaluate its models, improve them when possible, and go back to its current practice of adjusting staffing targets to reflect facility-specific issues."

(source: Reuters)