Latest News
-
Memo says Spirit will cut flight capacity and jobs by 25%.
Spirit Airlines will cut jobs in November as it plans to reduce its capacity by 25% compared to the previous year, according to an internal memo. This is a further blow to the low-cost carrier. In a memo to employees, CEO Dave Davis explained that the cutbacks are intended to "optimize [our] network in order to focus on our most important markets". The memo stated that "These evaluations are bound to affect the size our teams, as we become an efficient airline." Uncertain is the number of roles which could be affected. According to the memo, the low-cost airline continues to evaluate its fleet size and plans to meet the leaders of the airlines' unions in the next few weeks. CNBC reported earlier on the restructuring plan. Spirit filed for bankruptcy last month, the second time within a year. A previous reorganization had failed to give it a more stable financial foundation. Spirit's financial troubles, along with a rush by U.S. carriers in pursuit of premium travelers, has raised fears that the cheap flight era might be coming to an end for budget-conscious travelers. United Airlines had earlier on Tuesday ruled out the possibility of bidding for Spirit's assets if and when they became available. This is expected to happen as part of Spirit's restructuring. Reporting by Gursimran K. Kaur in Bengaluru and Angela Christy; Editing by Alan Barona, Rashmi Aich
-
France prepares for protests and strikes against budget cuts
Teachers, pharmacists, and train drivers are among the workers who will be striking in France on Friday as part of a protest against budget cuts. The unions want more public spending, higher taxes on the rich and the scrapping an unpopular pension change. Social unrest occurs as President Emmanuel Macron, and newly appointed Sebastien lecornu, face a political crisis in order to control finances and bring the second largest economy of the eurozone under control. According to a source in the Interior Ministry, 800 000 people are expected to participate in protests and strikes. Workers Angry Over Fiscal Plans The main unions in the country said that "the workers we represent are furious" in a statement where they rejected the fiscal plans of the previous government, which were "brutal" as well as "unfair". Lecornu, who relies on other parties for legislation to pass, will have to fight a political battle in order to get a budget approved by the parliament for 2026. Lecornu became prime minister after Francois Bayrou was ousted by the parliament last week over his plan to squeeze the budget by 44 billion euros. Lecornu hasn't yet stated what he plans to do with Bayrou’s plans but has said that he is open to compromise. Sophie Binet, the CGT union's chief after meeting Lecornu in early this week, said: "We will continue mobilising as long as there are no adequate responses." "The budget decision will be made on the streets." PROTESTS TO HIT SCHOOL, TRAIN The FSU-SNUipp said that one in three primary teachers will be on strike. The power company EDF announced that some of its employees would be on strike. Officials said that the Metro network in Paris will experience widespread disruptions, and regional trains as well. However, the majority of high-speed TGV lines will continue to operate. Confederation Paysanne, the farmers' union has also called for mobilization. Pharmacists have been angry about changes that affect their businesses. The USPO pharmacists union conducted a survey among pharmacies and found 98% of them could close the next day. BFM TV reported that Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said 80,000 police officers and gendarmes would be deployed. Retailleau stated that riot units, drones and armored vehicles would be present to combat what he described as possible sabotage or attempts to block different sites in the early morning. He also said that he expected violent troublemakers to attempt to clash with the police. (Reporting by Dominique Vidalon, Mathias de Rozario, Juliette Jabkhiro Writing by Ingrid Melander Editing by Frances Kerry)
-
Peru President signss contract to allow Chevron and Westlawn entry
Dina Boluarte, the president of Peru, announced on Wednesday that she had modified a contract for hydrocarbon exploration and extraction. This would allow U.S. companies Westlawn and Chevron to enter the country. The contract formalizes their entry through a consortium run by Texas-based Anadarko (APCFC. UL, a subsidiary company of Occidental Petroleum Corporation. The agreement allows the companies to work in three offshore blocks, Z-61, Z62, and Z63, off Peru's La Libertad area, located north of Lima. Boluarte, at a government palace ceremony, said that the arrival of Chevron - the third largest oil company in the world - sends a clear and strong message. Peru is a stable, reliable and serious country for large-scale investments. She added, "If the exploration confirms that oil and gas deposits exist, we'll be facing a real energy renaissance which will have the potential to guarantee our economic growth for many decades." According to government data, Chevron, Anadarko, and Westlawn each will hold 35% of the consortium. The government announced an initial investment of $100 million dollars in the exploration phase. Executives from the three oil firms and Perupetro, the state regulator, signed off on the contract amendment. Pedro Romero said he is optimistic about this project. In a speech, he stated that "this is a project on which we have worked for years." It is the start of a brand new adventure. Reporting by Marco Aquino, Editing by Richard Chang
-
Executive says that holiday season imports are already arriving at the busiest US port.
The top executive of the nation's busiest port said that U.S. retailers had finished importing holiday goods at least one month earlier in an effort to reduce costs associated with President Donald Trump's changing tariff policies. Port of Los Angeles Director Gene Seroka said that "a large amount of holiday cargo is already here and moving through the supply chain." He said that the traditional holiday rush, also known as peak season, which is traditionally driven by retail, happened early. About half of the cargo volume is handled by retailers at the Port Los Angeles. Dockworkers handled 1,019 837 20-foot-equivalent units (TEUs), the highest monthly cargo volume the Port of Los Angeles has ever seen in its 117 year history. The total volume at the Port of Los Angeles in August was 958.355 TEUs. This is down 0.2% compared to a year earlier. Seroka anticipates that import volumes will continue to decline throughout the rest of the year. He said that September will be about 850,000 TEUs. This is 10% less than the previous year. Forecasters say that several trends point to a drab holiday season in 2025. This month, the National Retail Federation (which represents companies such as Walmart and Target) said that it expects container imports will continue to decline throughout the rest of the year, due to the rising U.S. Tariffs. "Shifting Trade Policies Continue to Create Uncertainty for Businesses and Consumers," Mario Cordero said, CEO of Port of Long Beach which borders the Port of Los Angeles. Seroka explained that this is contributing to a slowdown in job growth, and the lingering of inflation. This makes importers and customers a bit more cautious. Retail sales in the United States increased more than anticipated in August. This is the third consecutive month that retail sales have increased, despite a backdrop of price hikes fueled by tariffs. But a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey released this month showed that holiday spending by U.S. consumers is set for its steepest drop since the pandemic as shoppers -- particularly Gen Z -- pull back amid economic uncertainty. (Reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles; Editing by Jamie Freed)
-
Families of Air India crash victims sue Honeywell and Boeing
Families of four passengers who died in the crash June 12 crash In a lawsuit, the owner of an Air India Boeing 787-8 said that the accident was caused by allegedly defective fuel switches. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Has said that the accident which killed 260 people does not appear to be caused by him. The lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court on Tuesday blames Honeywell and Boeing, who made the switches, as the cause of the crash that occurred seconds after Flight 171 left Ahmedabad, India, bound for London. Plaintiffs cite a 2018 FAA advisor that suggested, but did no mandate, that operators of various Boeing models, such as the 787, check the locking mechanism on the fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not accidentally be moved. The Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), India Report of preliminary investigation The investigation into the crash found that Air India did not perform the recommended inspections and that maintenance records indicated that the throttle control modules, which include the fuel switches, were replaced on the aircraft involved in the accident in 2019 and in 2023. The report stated that "all applicable airworthiness instructions and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, as well as engine" were adhered to. Honeywell and Boeing both declined to comment. The cockpit recording between the two pilots of the jet suggests that, contrary to previous reports, the captain had cut off the fuel flow to the engines. The lawsuit claims that the switches were placed in an area of the cockpit that was more likely to have been accidentally pushed. This "effectively guaranteed" that normal cockpit activities could lead to inadvertently cutting off fuel. Experts in aviation safety told us that this could not happen. Flip Based on their design and location. This lawsuit is the first to have been filed in the United States regarding the crash. The lawsuit seeks damages that are not specified for the deaths suffered by Naavya Dhirubhai, Kuberbhai, and Babiben, all of whom were passengers. Also, 19 passengers and 12 crew members were killed. One passenger survived. The plaintiffs are Indian or British citizens and reside in India or Britain. The preliminary report of Indian investigators appeared to exonerate Boeing, and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace. However, some family groups have criticized the investigators and press for being too focused on pilots' behavior. Legal experts state that, although most accidents are the result of a variety of factors, lawyers who represent victims' families often target manufacturers as they don't have to face the same limitations on liability as airlines. These strategies may also increase the likelihood of bringing a case in U.S. court, which is widely regarded as being more generous to plaintiffs compared to many foreign courts. Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al is the case at Delaware Superior Court No. N25C-09-145. (Reporting and editing by Les Adler, Marguerita Choy, and Les Adler; Additional reporting in Seattle by Dan Catchpole; Reporting by Jonathan Stempel).
-
Colombia asks UN Aviation Agency for global standards on pet protection on planes
After a series of high-profile incidents in which dogs died on planes, Colombia has asked the U.N. aviation agency to adopt global standards for air transporting pets across borders. The representative of Colombia's ICAO said that the country wants to see the organization, which sets international standards for everything from seatbelts to runways, create rules regarding pets in aircraft. The proposal of the South American country, which is supported by about two dozen countries from Latin America and Europe has been made ahead of ICAO’s triennial meeting that runs from September 23 through October 3. "Colombia talks about this because there have been a few instances in our country that negatively affected the health of pets," Mauricio Koppel, a representative from Colombia for ICAO, said on Tuesday. "We found that ICAO does not have a guide that establishes rules and standards for the proper transport of living beings and pets." ICAO can't impose rules to member states but countries who approve of the agency standards tend to adhere by them. The COVID-19 pandemic and the growing pet ownership have led to a surge in demand for "dog first" flights, such as those offered by BARK Air. Virgin Australia announced Wednesday that it will begin allowing small dogs and cats to travel in the cabin of some domestic flights on October 16th. Some airlines will transport pets in the cargo hold instead of the cabin. However, some breeds such as French bulldogs or pugs may be banned because they are at a higher risk of heatstroke. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, incidents involving injured or deceased animals on airplanes are rare. According to a Colombian ICAO working paper, the increase in pet travel has raised concerns about ventilation and safety containment. In the years 2021 and 2022 there were two cases where dogs died aboard small carriers. Meanwhile, in 2020, the Canadian Kennel Club demanded government reforms after dozens of dogs died on a Ukraine International Airlines flight between Kyiv and Toronto. In 2018, a French Bulldog died in an overhead bin after a United Airlines cabin attendant had ordered its stowing. This incident prompted the United States to pass legislation that prohibits airlines from placing animals in dangerous situations by storing them in overhead compartments. Koppel says that the International Air Transport Association, a lobby group for airlines, has set rules on animal transportation across borders. However, these are not legally binding. Qatar Airways, a Middle Eastern carrier, allows falcons to fly in the cabin. Other countries such as Australia require that dogs and cats be quarantined upon arrival. Koppel stated that there was a gap in the law. IATA stated on Wednesday that their live animal regulations are widely recognized and adopted by regulators around the world as "global benchmarks for safe and humane air transport of animals." The group is in favor of ICAO providing a framework for pet transport to all countries as long as there are no duplications. (Reporting and editing by Jamie Freed in Montreal, Allison Lampert is reporting from Montreal)
-
Families of Air India crash victims sue Honeywell and Boeing
Families of four Air India Flight 171 passengers who were killed in the crash on June 30 blamed Boeing and Honeywell for their negligence, and also a defective fuel cutoff switch, which led to the death of 260 people. Flight 171, which was en route from Ahmedabad to London, crashed on June 12 shortly after it took off. The plaintiffs in a complaint filed Tuesday at the Delaware Superior Court said that the locking mechanism on the switch of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner may have been turned off accidentally or missed, resulting in a loss in fuel supply and the loss of thrust required for takeoff. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration warned in 2018 that disengaged locking mechanism on Boeing aircraft could pose a risk. By placing the switch behind the thrust levers "Boeing effectively ensured that normal cockpit activities could result in an inadvertent cutoff of fuel." The complaint stated. "What did Honeywell, Boeing and other companies do to avoid the inevitable catastrophe?" Nothing." Boeing, located in Arlington, Virginia declined to comment Wednesday. Honeywell of Charlotte, North Carolina did not respond immediately to comment requests. Both companies were incorporated in Delaware. This lawsuit is the first to have been filed in the United States regarding the crash. The lawsuit seeks damages that are not specified for the deaths suffered by Naavya Dhirubhai, Kuberbhai, and Babiben, all of whom were passengers. Also, 19 passengers and 12 crew members were killed. One passenger survived. The plaintiffs are Indian or British citizens and reside in either country. The cause of the crash has not been determined conclusively by investigators from India, Britain and America. According to a preliminary report published by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, the confusion that occurred in the cockpit prior to the crash was described in a July report. Bryan Bedford, administrator of the U.S. FAA in July, also expressed "high confidence" that mechanical problems or an inadvertent move of fuel control components was not the cause. Boeing incurred legal costs and other costs of more than $20 billion from the two fatal crashes of 737 MAX aircraft that occurred in 2018 and 2019 The most popular plane was grounded for more than 20 months. Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al is the case at Delaware Superior Court No. N25C-09-145. (Reporting and editing by Leslie Adler; Additional reporting from Dan Catchpole, Seattle; Additional reporting from Jonathan Stempel).
-
US lawmakers ask Trump to reinstate the delay compensation program for air travelers
A group of 77 House Democrats on Wednesday urged President Donald Trump's administration to reinstate the plan that his predecessor championed to compensate U.S. passengers for airline delays. The Transportation Department announced on September 4 that it would not follow a proposal by the then Democratic president Joe Biden, which required airlines to compensate passengers in cash when carriers cause flight disruptions within the United States. The lawmakers, led by Democratic Representatives Greg Stanton, and Rick Larsen, said that the Trump administration, instead of rolling back passenger protections, should focus on bipartisan, common-sense ways to lower costs for customers while maintaining the safety of our skies. This decision will increase the cost of traveling and undermine consumer protections. USDOT, under Biden's leadership, asked for public comments in December on whether airlines should have to pay between $200 and $775 per delay. The U.S. airline industry has strongly criticized Biden's proposal from 2023. Sean Duffy's spokesperson said that the best way to end endless delays was to fix the broken air traffic system. He also criticized how the previous administration handled the issue. USDOT stated that it will implement the consumer protection mandates of Congress to "ensure that travelers are treated fairly, while also acknowledging how excessive regulations can raise ticket prices." In the U.S., airlines must reimburse passengers for cancelled flights if they choose to not fly. However, they are not required compensate customers for delayed flights. All four countries - the European Union, Canada and Britain - have rules on airline delays compensation. Airlines for America, the trade group that represents American Airlines Delta Air Lines United Airlines Southwest Airlines and other airlines, stated Wednesday, "the entire business model of airlines is based on repeat, satisfied customers." In this highly competitive market, carriers do not need any additional incentives to provide quality services. In 2022, major U.S. airlines will pay for meals, hotels, and other expenses if flight delays are significant. USDOT has also revealed this month that it is considering revoking regulations that were issued under Biden, which required airlines to disclose fees along with airfare. It will also be writing new rules that define a cancellation of flight that allows consumers to receive a refund. (Reporting and editing by Chris Reese, Aurora Ellis, and David Shepardson)
Shipping companies pull out of Hong Kong to avoid US-China risks
Some shipping companies move their operations discreetly out of Hong Kong, and remove vessels from its registry. Some shipping companies are making contingency planning to do this.
Six shipping executives have said that these low-profile actions are motivated by a fear that their vessels could be seized by Chinese authorities, or face U.S. sanction in the event of a clash between Beijing and Washington. The people said that the growing U.S. scrutiny over the importance of China’s commercial fleet to a potential military conflict, such as one over Taiwan, and Beijing's emphasis of Hong Kong's role in serving Chinese interests is causing concern in the shipping industry. Last month, the U.S. Trade Representative proposed imposing steep U.S. fees on Chinese shipping firms and other companies that operate Chinese-built ships to counter China's "targeted dominant" in shipbuilding and maritime logistic. Washington warned American companies in September about the growing risks associated with operating in Hong Kong. The U.S. has already imposed sanctions on officials who are involved in a crackdown.
Hong Kong has been the hub of shipowners for over a century, as well as brokers, financiers underwriters, and lawyers who support them. Official data shows that its maritime and port industries accounted for 4,2% of the GDP in 2022.
VesselsValue - a subsidiary company of Veson Nautical, a maritime data group - reports that the city's flag was flown on eight out of ten ships in the world.
Interviews with two dozen people familiar with Hong Kong including shipping executives and lawyers revealed a growing concern about the possibility that commercial maritime operations in Hong Kong could be caught up by forces outside their control if a U.S. - China military conflict occurs.
Many pointed out China's increased focus on national security goals, trade frictions, and Hong Kong's leader's broad powers to take control of shipping if necessary, as he is accountable to Beijing.
One executive who, like many others, was allowed to remain anonymous to discuss this sensitive subject said: "We do not want to be in the position where China is knocking on our door, requesting our ships, while the U.S. targets us from the other side."
Previously, the concerns of shipowners as well as their efforts to limit exposure to Hong Kong were not reported. In recent years the perception of risk has increased, in line with the tightening security environment in the Chinese-ruled area and the tensions between two of the largest economies in the world.
Turning Tide
To comply with safety and environment rules, commercial ships must be registered or flagged with a specific country or jurisdiction.
VesselsValue, an independent research firm, found that despite the influx of Chinese ships on Hong Kong's register, the number oceangoing vessels registered in the city dropped by more than 8% in January, from 2,580 in January 2004. Government data show a similar drop.
In 2023 and 2024 74 ships, mostly dry-bulk carriers, were re-flagged for Singapore and Marshall Islands. These vessels transport commodities like coal, iron ore, and grain. VesselsValue reports that 15 tankers and 7 container ships left Hong Kong's registry to fly these flags.
Hong Kong's ship registry has seen a dramatic decline in the last two years. Official data shows that it grew by 400% over the past 20 years.
Hong Kong's Government responded to questions by saying that it is normal for shipping companies, given the changing geopolitical, trade and economic circumstances, to review their operations. It is also normal for the numbers of ships registered to fluctuate over the short-term.
A spokesperson stated that Hong Kong will "continue to excel" as an international shipping center, highlighting a variety of incentives, such as profits tax breaks and environmental subsidies, for shipowners.
The spokesperson stated that neither the laws governing registry nor the emergency provisions empower Hong Kong's leader in commandeering ships to serve as part of a Chinese merchant navy.
When asked to comment on the concerns of industry players about how emergency powers from colonial times might be used during a conflict between the U.S. and China, the spokesperson declined. The provisions give the leader of the city "any regulation whatsoever", which includes taking control over vessels and property.
China's commerce and defence ministries did not respond to questions regarding the role of the merchant fleet in Beijing’s warfighting plan, the possible involvement of Hong Kong flagged vessels, or the concerns of commercial shipowners.
The U.S. Treasury declined to comment on potential sanctions, concerns of shipping executives, or the role played by Hong Kong-registered ships in a Chinese commercial fleet.
Lawyers and executives agree that ships can be reflagged in a variety of ways, including through the sale, chartering or redeployment on different routes.
Basil Karatzas of Karatzas Marine Advisors & Co in the U.S. said that Singapore was becoming the preferred domicile for businesses with less exposure to Chinese shipping or cargo trade. It offered many efficiencies including its legal system but also a lower risk than Hong Kong.
Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority stated that decisions regarding domiciles and flags were based on business considerations. The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore said it had not noticed any "significant changes" in the number Hong Kong shipping companies moving operations or reflagging vessels to Singapore.
MERCHANT FLEEET
Executives and lawyers agree that Hong Kong's registry for shipping is highly regarded by the industry because of its high safety and regulatory standards. This allows its ships to easily pass through foreign ports. Many of China's international state-owned vessels now fly Hong Kong's banner.
According to PLA military studies and four security analysts, in a conflict these tankers and bulk carriers would be the backbone of the merchant fleet that supplies China's oil and food needs.
The U.S., on the other hand, has a very small shipbuilding industry. It also has far fewer vessels under its flag. Three analysts say that while China's growing state-owned fleet would be a target of the U.S. during a military conflict, Beijing would need other vessels in order to supply its needs, given its reliance on international shipping lanes and vast needs.
Donald Trump has been keeping a close eye on strategic maritime operations. Trump said in his January inauguration address that he would "take back" control of the Panama Canal from China. Trump did not provide specifics but his remarks focused on two Panama port operated by a Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings subsidiary. The group did not respond to any questions regarding Trump's remarks, but agreed to sell the majority of the subsidiary's shares to a consortium led by BlackRock this week, giving U.S. interest control over the port. Trump said to Congress that his administration would create a shipbuilding office in the White House, and provide new tax incentives.
In a study conducted by the U.S. Congress in November 2023, it was stated that "cargo vessels typically transport 90% of military equipment required in overseas conflicts". The report noted that Chinese shipyards ordered 1,794 ocean-going large ships in 2022 compared to five in the U.S.
Merchant vessels played a crucial role in Britain's 1982 long-range operation to retake Argentina's Falkland Islands. Declassified CIA files show that UK-flagged ships operated out of Hong Kong, many of which were owned or controlled by Chinese firms, supplied communist Hanoi in the Vietnam War.
In 2013, President Xi Jinping outlined the need for a Chinese merchant fleet that would help to build China's maritime strength in a Politburo session.
In the past decade, Chinese military and government documents and studies have emphasized the dual-use value of China’s merchant ships.
According to state media, regulations enacted in 2014 required Chinese builders to build five types of commercial ships, including tankers and container ships, to be able to serve military requirements.
Since then, COSCO has seen a significant increase in its line.
Documents from COSCO show that China places political commissars, officers who make sure Communist Party goals are served, on nominally civil ships.
The U.S. banned COSCO subsidiaries in January for what they said were links with the Chinese military.
COSCO has not responded to any questions regarding its deployment of commissars, U.S. restrictions, or what role COSCO's ships -- including those with Hong Kong flags -- might play in wartime.
'REALLY DE-RISKED'
Hong Kong is still an important shipowners' base, despite geopolitical issues. Some shipowners are quietly hedging.
Taylor Maritime (London-listed) a company that was founded in Hong Kong, in 2014, has a much smaller presence in Hong Kong now after several strategic moves in the last few years.
It has been flagging its ships in Singapore and the Marshall Islands since 2021. The company has offices in London, Guernsey and Singapore.
A person with knowledge of the matter said that the firm "really reduced the risk of Hong Kong". This was due to investors' fears of a Chinese invasion in Taiwan and the Communist Party taking control of Hong Kong.
Taylor Maritime's spokesperson stated that the company initially moved its Asia-based teams from Hong Kong to Singapore to be closer to their clients.
Taylor Maritime, after acquiring Grindrod, a shipping company with an Asia office in Singapore and expanding its operations there, relocated certain functions from Hong Kong to Singapore, where it became the primary Asia hub.
Two people with knowledge of the situation said that Pacific Basin Shipping, a Hong Kong listed company, has always flagged its 110 bulk carrier fleet in Hong Kong. However, it is now preparing contingency plans for them to be registered elsewhere while it assesses possible risks.
Pacific Basin's spokesperson stated that the company constantly evaluated geopolitical risk but its fleet still flew the Hong Kong flag "which, at least for the moment, outweighs the challenges".
The spokesperson stated that "Being located in Hong Kong places us near China's 40% share of the global dry bulk export/import activity as well as close to Asia's strong industrial and economic growth regions."
Angad Banga said that shipping firms adjust contingency plans based upon risk assessments, but he has not heard of concerns regarding the commandeering vessels.
Banga said that although some organizations may be re-evaluating their operational strategies, they do not see a widespread exodus from Hong Kong or a loss of confidence. The city, he added, remained attractive to maritime commerce.
Some industry figures have described a general unease in Hong Kong, which has affected their planning.
Three lawyers have said that, until recently, contracts for the increasing number of ships constructed in China that are financed by Chinese banks stipulated that the ship must fly the Hong Kong Flag.
Lawyers said that in the past two years some companies have added a disclaimer to their contracts, stating that they are willing to consider other flags as an alternative. Could not independently verify these changes. Beijing officials have stressed that Hong Kong is important in achieving national security goals. They also referred to China's modernisation of its military and refusal to abandon the use of force against Taiwan.
Three executives and lawyers said that the sweeping security laws, which were first implemented in Hong Kong in July 2021 and then strengthened in March 2020, have increased dangers.
Lawyers said that any attempt by Hong Kong’s leader to commandeer ships in an emergency could prove difficult, since locally registered vessels often travel routes far away from Hong Kong. They said that such powers, which have been in place for a long time, now needed to be seen through the lens of national security.
One lawyer stated that some shipowners would not object to a request from the government to hand over their vessels. This could be due to patriotism, or because they might profit by a crisis.
Another veteran lawyer said that it is "better to avoid being in a situation where you could be asked".
It was not an issue a few short years ago. The national security map has been redrawn. (Reporting and editing by David Crawshaw; Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal, Idrees, and Idrees in Washington and Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong;
(source: Reuters)