Latest News

US LNG exporters are looking to renegotiate contracts to cover rising costs

According to company statements and sources, several U.S. producers of LNG are trying to renegotiate with buyers higher prices due to rising construction, labor, and borrowing costs. The higher prices will reduce the competitiveness of U.S. LNG on the global markets, especially at a moment when President Donald Trump wants to expand this industry.

Alex Munton is the director of Global Gas and LNG Research at Rapidan Energy Group. He said that "the competitiveness of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) could be affected by a double-whammy." Munton said that rising liquefaction prices, a tighter gas market at home, and declining prices for competing supplies index to oil, could all have an impact on the competitiveness of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas.

Energy Transfer's coCEO said on an earnings call, that negotiations are underway. According to four sources, Mexico Pacific and Venture Global have been seeking to renegotiate supply purchase agreements.

Mexico Pacific is trying to renegotiate a higher liquefaction fee with Chinese buyers Zhejiang Energy, and Guangzhou Gas. This according to two Chinese officials who are familiar with the situation. Mexico Pacific is trying to negotiate the price because the U.S. engineering company Bechtel that is building the plant wants a construction cost which has made the project expensive.

Mexico Pacific and Bechtel declined to comment.

Sources claim that Zhejiang, Guangzhou and other cities have rejected Mexico Pacific’s proposal. The sources did not give any details on Mexico Pacific's costs of liquefaction or how much it wanted to pay for them.

One of two sources who have direct knowledge of this matter said that Guangzhou has requested to reduce its share of the project's revenue from 1 MTPA per year to 700,000 tonnes per annum.

Zhejiang Energy did not respond to requests for comments sent via email. Guangzhou Development Group (parent company of Guangzhou Gas) did not comment immediately. Venture Global, second largest U.S. exporter of LNG, is also trying to renegotiate a higher price for its CP2 Louisiana project, despite the fact that the plant has yet to begin construction and have not received the financial go ahead, according to separate sources. Venture Global declined to comment on a request. In January, the company told investors that fees for liquefaction could increase to $4 per million British Thermal Unit (mmBtu), up from $2.25. Energy Transfer, which has a 16.5 MTPA facility for LNG export in Louisiana under construction, stated on a February earnings call that it was also renegotiating liquefaction charges with customers to try and align higher construction costs with the offtake agreements.

Everyone understands the cost increases. We are continuing to negotiate with the companies in order to reduce their fees, said Marshall McCrea.

McCrea stated that customers stuck with their projects despite being asked to pay higher fees.

Cheniere Energy, the largest U.S. exporter of LNG, announced in February that it would not be increasing fees. This is in part due to its prices already being linked to inflation, and because its projects are constructed on brownfields, which have cost advantages. Baker Hughes, one the biggest equipment suppliers to the U.S. gas sector, was able to control its inflation, but LNG developers have seen increases, according to Lorenzo Simonelli.

Simonelli, who was referring to engineering, procurement and construction companies, said that the EPCs are the ones that we tend to see more of. If we looked at the external climate, we'd say that there was some inflation. In general, the liquefaction fee for U.S. LNG is on track to increase above $2.50/mmBtu because of a tight labor pool, rising construction costs and persistently high interest rates.

Poten warned that higher liquefaction costs could reduce the cost-competitiveness for U.S. LNG project, particularly if they are coupled with an increase of U.S. gas prices or a fall in Brent crude oil,

Poten stated that inflation, on top of the labor shortages, is driving up equipment and material prices.

(source: Reuters)