Latest News

Trafigura wins $600 Million Nickel Fraud lawsuit against Gupta

Trafigura has won its London case against Indian businessman Prateek?Gupta regarding fake nickel cargoes on Friday. The High Court of London ruled in favor of the commodities 'trader.

Trafigura, a Geneva-based company, claimed that Gupta and his companies were the masterminds of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme??in which they agreed to deliver high-quality nickel 99.8% but instead delivered low-value materials or even worthless ones.

Gupta acknowledged he didn't deliver high-grade Nickel cargoes, but claims Trafigura staff designed the scheme. Former Trafigura head nickel trader Sokratis Oikonomou had denied this in his testimony given in November.

Judge Pushpinder Saini ruled Trafigura had been induced into contracting "by false and fraudulent representations" by Gupta?and his firms.

The judge said that Trafigura's ex-employees, including Oikonomou were "totally innocent" of any wrongdoing.

Trafigura's spokesperson said that the ruling was "comprehensively in Trafigura's favor and acknowledges the systematic fraud committed by Mr Gupta, and the corporate defendants".

The spokesperson said, "We are continuing to pursue Mr Gupta's recovery."

An attorney who represented Gupta didn't immediately respond to our request for comment. The court records show that the law firm who represented Gupta during his trial has no longer represented him.

No real defence

Trafigura received its first complaints in November 2022 about the cargoes that it sold. The trial concluded in December.

Trafigura carried out additional inspections and?booked a $590-million charge. It then sued Gupta's companies in February 2023, for what they called "systematic fraud".

Trafigura claimed during the trial that Gupta was a fraudster with a long history and accused him to siphon off funds from his struggling businesses.

Gupta said Trafigura had devised a "complex merry go round of transactions" that appeared to boost its position in nickel trading. He gave his evidence remotely from Dubai. His lawyers claimed that the scheme involved more than 500 trades worth $3.3 billion.

Trafigura's attorneys said that this was "simply an effort to explain the admitted fraudulent and described Gupta’s evidence as "implausible and inconsistent... and plainly unbelievable".

Saini stated in his decision that Mr Gupta "decided to 'go on the attack' and invent the story of the agreement" because he had no defence against the fraud claim. (Reporting and editing by William James and Elaine Hardcastle; reporting by Sam Tobin)

(source: Reuters)