Latest News

Uber loses UK Supreme Court Appeal over Tax on Rival Apps

Uber's competitors in England and Wales who operate taxis will not be charged a VAT of 20% on their margins outside London, after Uber lost an appeal against a previous decision on Tuesday.

Uber wanted a court order that private-hire operators contract with their passengers. This means they must charge 20% VAT outside London, as Uber does.

The case was brought after the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that Uber drivers are workers and therefore entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and VAT on rides.

Uber wanted the same conditions to be applied to competitors and the High Court decided in its favor last year. The ruling was for rides outside London in England and Wales, where there is a different regulatory system.

The Court of Appeal reversed this ruling in July 2024, following a challenge from private hire operators Delta Taxis as well as platform Veezu.

Uber appealed to the Supreme Court which, on Tuesday, unanimously dismissed it, ruling that the operators were not required to sign a contract with the passengers.

Uber spokesperson stated that the ruling confirms "that different contractual protections are applicable for people booking trips from London in comparison to the rest England and Wales", however, it has "no effect on Uber's VAT application".

Layla Barke Jones from Aaron & Partners is the lawyer for Delta Taxis. She said that a win by Uber would have negatively affected many private hire operators.

Veezu's chief legal officer Nia cooper said that the ruling prevented significant fare increases.

In another case, the Estonian startup Bolt that offers food and ride-hailing services has defeated an appeal from Britain's tax authority HMRC this year on what it must charge VAT at 20 percent.

HMRC was granted permission by the Court of Appeal to contest the ruling that Bolt only has to pay VAT on the margin and not the total cost of the trip.

Kimberly Hurd is Bolt's senior UK general manager. She welcomed the Supreme Court decision regarding Uber's appeal but stated that a new regulatory structure was required to ensure rules are consistent throughout the UK. (Reporting and editing by Sarah Young, Susan Fenton and Sam Tobin)

(source: Reuters)