Latest News
-
State media reports that four oil facility guards were killed in an explosion near Syria's Deir al-Zor.
The state news agency reported that four oil facility guards died in an attack against a bus east of Deir al-Zor. The attack was not immediately claimed by any group. A security source said that the military personnel were part of a contingent of soldiers securing the Teim Oilfield. They were returning to their home in Salo, east of Deir al-Zor after completing their shift on the site located west of the province. This is the most deadly incident since Assad fell in eastern Syria, the province that produces the majority of Syria's wheat and oil. Three months ago ISIS sleeper cell attacks on a Mayadeen police station. The latest attack took place near SDF controlled areas east of Euphrates where tensions have been rising between government forces, and the SDF in recent days. The Euphrates River divides the region along the border of Iraq between the areas controlled by Syria and those by the U.S.-backed SDF. They control the oilfields on the east side of the river.
-
Transneft claims that Russian oil companies have not reduced their oil supplies
Transneft's pipeline network is not experiencing a reduction in supplies from Russian oil companies, according to a senior Transneft executive. Deliveries this year will be on par with those of 2024. Maxim Grishanin is the first vice president of the company. He told reporters that the company had enough capacity to handle a possible rise in supply. Russia will increase its output to meet the demands of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies. Transneft transports over 80% of the oil produced by the country. Grishanin stated that Transneft had a growing cash deficit due to an increased tax burden. It was forced to put some projects on hold and allocate funds to current assets. The Russian parliament passed a bill last year that would have allowed the country to use an Tax increases Transneft profits will increase from 20% to 40% for 2025-2030, as Moscow looks to raise funds to fund its military campaign in Ukraine. Ukraine and Russia have intensified their attacks on each others' energy facilities, as the peace talks that were supposed to end the conflict in July have been stuck. Last month, Ukrainian attacks disrupted Russian oil imports from Primorsk - a major outlet along the Baltic Sea. (Reporting and editing by Mark Trevelyan; Vladimir Soldatkin)
-
German drone manufacturer Quantum is nearing a funding round that could triple its valuation
According to Manager Magazine, which cited unnamed sources, the German drone manufacturer Quantum Systems could be close to finishing a funding round of 150 million euros ($175 millions) that would triple its valuation up to 3 billion euro. After recent drone disruptions in major airports, the startup company's new drone, "Jaeger", is designed to intercept unmanned aircraft that are hostile. Demand has risen. Quantum, according to the report plans to grow in the near future by acquiring technology companies and startups. The magazine said that Quantum's projected revenue will reach 300 million Euros in 2025, and 500 million euros in 2026. The report stated that a second larger funding round for 2026 could push the company's valuation up to 5 billion euro. Quantum Systems didn't immediately respond to a comment request from. The report was released after the German government announced that it would give police the authority to shoot down drones that disrupted airports in Europe, and which some have attributed as a result of a hybrid warfare waged by Russia.
-
Swiss Army Knife maker uses new tools to counter Trump tariffs
Victorinox, a Swiss-made Swiss Army Knife, is trying to keep its U.S. price down while exploring new markets. It also tries out new tools in order to avoid President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs. The red and silver multi-tool, popularized in the United States after World War II by soldiers stationed in Europe, is manufactured in a factory located in Ibach in central Switzerland. Rolls of stainless steel are punched out into blades. These are then rounded using abrasive stones, and baked for more than 1,000°C before they are sharpened. Victorinox is among the many Swiss companies that are concerned about the cost of doing business in the United States. In August, Trump imposed 39% tariffs on the import of Swiss goods in an effort to reduce the U.S.'s trade deficit with Switzerland. "If tariffs remain in place, this is an extremely challenging situation," said Carl Elsener. His great-grandfather founded Victorinox in 1884. The higher levy will cost Victorinox $13 million per year. Elsener said that the U.S. represented 13% of Victorinox’s sales in 2024, which totaled 417 million Swiss Francs ($519 millions). If the 39% tariff remains in place, every product Victorinox ships to the U.S. would lose money. Victorinox responded by sending additional stock to the U.S. in order to increase inventories. It also pushed for efficiency at its Swiss factories. It may also consider doing some polishing or packaging in the U.S., to reduce its import cost. Elsener, Victorinox's U.S. sales, marketing, and logistics staff, said: "We want to reduce our dependence upon the U.S. Market by expanding more strongly in other market like Latin America and Asia." AVOIDING PRICE INCREASES IN THE US Victorinox, a family-owned company, is not the only one feeling the pinch. According to a survey conducted by Swiss Mechanic last month, 45% of small and medium manufacturing companies in Switzerland have seen their order intakes drop since the U.S. Tariffs. The Swiss profit margins have already been eroded this year by the 12% increase in the Swiss franc against US dollar. Novartis, Roche and other drugmakers could be in the firing lines if tariffs are extended to them. Nestle, the food giant, has already been hit, as have Swiss watchmakers such as Omega's Swatch Group. Elsener said: "Our priority right now is to accept losses and avoid price increases in order to maintain market share. In February and March, Victorinox shipped two additional 40-foot containers containing about 200,000 Swiss Army Knives plus 200,000 commercial and kitchen knives to the United States. This should allow it to maintain prices in 2026, as well as have enough stock for the U.S. by the end of the year. MAKING SWISS ARMED KNIVES AROUND THE WORLD IS 'NOT A OPTION.' Victorinox, which has raised some prices targeted at certain customers, is speeding up automation and efficiency programs in its Ibach plant where 25 family members still work. Elsener stated that the company considered moving production to the United States, or to other parts of Europe, to reduce the impact of tariffs, but decided against it because the scale was not there. He said that the government is instead looking to reduce the dutyable value by reducing the end-of-line jobs in the U.S., such as the cleaning and packaging commercial knives. It cannot manufacture its products anywhere else, because at least 60% manufacturing costs must be in Switzerland to qualify for the Swiss Made label. Elsener said that the Swiss Army Knife brand is dependent on its Swiss heritage and would not consider producing it abroad. He is still confident about the future. He said, "We have survived the First World War and the Depression. We have also been through the Second World War. The global economic crisis has occurred, as well as the oil crisis." "This is the latest challenge, and I am confident that we will overcome it."
-
Where are the barrels of oil? IEA gap deepens confusion over looming glut: Bousso
The International Energy Agency (IEA) continues to predict a significant oil supply glut, but the uncertainty surrounding the location of nearly 1.5 million barrels of crude oil per day is putting this forecast into question. Since months, the oil market has been unable to find a direction. Prices have remained in a tight range as traders tried to understand starkly divergent projections of supply and demand from IEA and OPEC. The IEA has predicted a severe glut of oil this year and in the next due to increased global production. The Paris-based agency's latest report, released on Tuesday provided an even more pessimistic outlook. It forecast a surplus in 2025 of 2,35 million barrels a day and 4 million bpd, or nearly 4%, of global demand, next year. OPEC on the other side expects that global oil supply will closely follow demand until 2026. This difference is remarkable, as it has never been seen before in the history of the largest commodity market in the world. Missing Barrels On Tuesday, the murky picture of crude oil became even more muddy when the IEA reported that it had been unable to account 1,47 million bpd in its global balances. This is the equivalent of 1.4% annual demand. The IEA's "unaccounted balance" for July was 850,000 bpd or 370,000 bpd overall for the second-quarter. This 1,47 million bpd number is a huge blind spot that has significant implications for global supply and demand. According to the IEA, supply exceeded demand by 2,04 million bpd during August. This means that, theoretically, oversupply can grow to 3.5 millions bpd, or even shrink to 500,000 bpd. This is a big difference which could have an impact on crude oil prices. The IEA calculates the global oil balances based on official government data, as well as private company and analyst figures about production, consumption and exports. Due to the size of the oil market, it is not uncommon for forecasters' calculations to be "holes". This can be due to the delays in reporting by government agencies and the absence of certain data sets. In fact, the IEA updates its historical data regularly. In its May monthly report, the agency revised upwards significant amounts of recent oil demand. This included increasing 2024 oil usage by 350,000 barrels per day, turning a reported surplus into a deficiency. The sheer magnitude of missing barrels reported by the IEA in its August report should cause traders and investors to pause. This is especially true because it comes at a moment when the market has already been trying to make sense out of forecasters' wildly different projections. Barrels that disappear The IEA stated that the discrepancy in August "may be due to the delay of reporting data or the lack of data for non OECD countries." It will take some time to fully account for the missing barrels. It is reasonable to believe that the missing barrels are due in part to two factors which have been confusing the crude market for the past year: the trading and stockpiling of oil that has been heavily sanctioned. The first question is how much oil sanctioned is being traded. According to Kpler, the volume of crude oil transported by sea last week reached 1.25 billion barrels. This is the highest level since the Covid-19 Pandemic began. Oil held at sea, or "oil in water", has never been greater. This build-up on the seas could be a precursor for a dramatic increase in storage overland - and a significant global oversupply. The picture is further complicated by the fact over a quarter (25%) of the oil in the water comes from countries that are under western sanctions, namely Russia, Iran and Venezuela. The majority of oil produced by these countries is transported in so-called "shadow" fleet tankers, which evade western sanctions and often hide their location by turning off satellite transponders. The IEA may have missed some barrels because it is difficult to track the movements of oil by sea. CRUDE HARDING There is also the issue of China's huge oil storage volumes. According to the IEA's forecast, global observed inventories – oil in storage and on vessels – grew by 225,000,000 barrels from January to August, reaching the highest level for four years. China, as the world's biggest oil importer, is clearly responsible for a large portion of the increase in inventories. Beijing, however, does not publicly disclose the size of its oil storage capacities or changes to inventories. Because traders lack official data, they rely on secondary information to estimate the size of China's rapidly growing storage network and the rate at which it is being filled. According to the IEA, Chinese crude stockpiles rose by 110,000,000 barrels between April 2025 and August 2025. This estimate is based on data provided by satellite analytics firm Kayrros. It is possible, given the lack firm data, that China's crude stock has increased by much more, and this could account for another part the IEA missing barrels. The IEA's mysterious missing barrels may indicate that the task of calculating production, consumption and exports in the vast global oil market will become even more difficult as geopolitics continue to obscure large portions of the market. Subscribe to my Power Up newsletter to receive my weekly column, plus additional energy insights and links trending stories in your mailbox every Monday and Thursday. Subscribe to my Power Up Newsletter here. You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. ROI provides data-driven, thought-provoking analysis. The markets are changing faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, X.
-
Maguire: Seven potentially magnificent US clean-energy stocks
After years of beatings, some U.S. listed clean energy stocks have been on a tear. They are outperforming the majority of established energy giants in spite U.S. president Donald Trump's policy shift away from clean energies since taking office. The AI boom is driving many of the gains, and the need for more electricity to power the data centers has boosted the stock prices of companies that are involved in boosting energy supply. Other firms are also benefiting from the worsening tensions in trade between the United States of America and China. These include companies that produce critical materials and components for the energy technology and defense industries. It's difficult to determine which stocks will be long-term winners. Some companies are actually making profits, but others are soaring on the hopes of product or process innovations that could be decades away. Seven stocks have shown impressive gains in 2025 and could become mainstream market darlings. NUCLEAR PROMISE Two firms with ties to the U.S. Nuclear Power Sector stand out: Centrus Energy Corp. and Oklo Inc. The stock price of Centrus Energy has risen by more than 550% in 2025. This is largely due to the Trump administration's encouragement of rapid development of nuclear power plants. Centrus is the first U.S.-based company to be licensed for production of High-Assay Low Enriched Uranium, which is an essential fuel for the new generation of nuclear reactors. Oklo shares have risen more than 700% in the past year. The company is also benefiting from the positive outlook for the small reactors it markets to data centers, as a reliable and clean source of power. While Centrus and Oklo may be riding high at the moment on the optimism surrounding nuclear power in America, they both face the challenge of converting potential sales into bankable revenue. Businesses that require more power quickly are still frustrated by the long development times of new nuclear reactors. Deployment delays could also work against nuclear developers. The order books of Centrus' and Oklo’s reactors may shrink quickly if utilities and developers of data centers find faster ways to meet their power requirements. RARE RESOURCES The stock prices of U.S. Antimony Corp. and American Resources Corp., both based in the United States, have reached multi-year highs by 2025. UAMY produces antimony, which is used extensively in batteries. AREC refines rare earths into high-purity materials that are used in magnets and heat-resistant applications. UAMY shares have risen around 690% in the past year, while AREC shares have risen around 390%. Both companies are receiving support from the U.S. Government as suppliers of vital resources and will therefore benefit from growing customer demand for non-Chinese vendors. Due to China's dominance of the production and supply chain for these materials, UAMY and AREC could struggle to expand their businesses in markets outside the U.S. where their Chinese competitors compete directly. Charge Ahead Some of the other notable clean energy stocks in the United States this year are Bloom Energy (which makes fuel cells for direct electricity generation at business sites) and Solid Power Inc., which manufactures batteries and energy storage systems for electric vehicles. Bloom Energy shares have risen over 400% in the past year, thanks to a contract with Brookfield Asset Management that made it their preferred power supplier at their AI factories. Solid Power shares have risen around 275% and with the positive outlook for grid-scale battery sales, it appears primed for further growth in the near to mid term. Both firms are facing stiff competition from competitors offering similar capabilities. They will also be affected by any possible slowdown in construction of AI data centers and energy storage systems. SolarEdge Technologies has also seen a notable increase in stock prices in 2025. The company makes inverters which optimize power flow through solar panels. SolarEdge's shares have risen by about 200% in the past year. SolarEdge, based in Israel, is not an American company. It has expanded rapidly its U.S. production base, and will therefore benefit from the strong demand for local-made components when the U.S. grid continues to add solar systems. The seven stocks above, although they all have distinct roles in the U.S. Clean Energy space, all have benefited so far from the growing tide of investor attention in this sector in 2025. Each firm has its own competitive advantages, which can help them to appeal to a wider range of investors. They could also compete for portfolio shares with tech giants like chipmakers and other companies in the future. These are the opinions of the columnist, an author for. You like this article? Check it out Open Interest The new global financial commentary source (ROI) is your go-to for all the latest news and information. ROI provides data-driven, thought-provoking analysis on everything from soybeans to swap rates. The markets are changing faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on You can find us on LinkedIn.
-
TNB CEO: Natural gas will overtake coal by 2032 as Malaysia's primary source of energy
Tenaga Nasional Bhd's (TNB) chief executive said that Malaysia would generate more electricity using natural gas by 2032 than it will from coal. Megat Jalaluddin, CEO of TNB, said that the demand for electricity from data centres is expected to stabilize, and the total amount of electricity used in Malaysia will likely be consistent with the projected growth rate of Malaysia's economy of 4%-4.5 percent in 2026. The investment in data centres has stabilized. Jalaluddin stated that the data centre investment is currently growing steadily. Malaysia has been compelled to increase its coal-fired energy output in recent months and import more fuel. According to TNB's presentation, Malaysia expects to import up to 35 million tons of coal per year until 2028. Data from the energy think tank Ember revealed that coal's share of Malaysia's electricity generation increased steadily, from 6% to 43% by 2024, from 6% to 2000. Gas' share, however, fell to 37% by 2024, from 80% to the start of the century. According to a TNB presentation on the subject, coal imports will decline by 2029. This will force Malaysia, which is the fifth largest exporter of LNG, to use more gas to generate electricity and to start importing super-cooled fuels as local gas reserves decrease. Jalaluddin stated that the Southeast Asian nation will add 50% more gas fired power capacity by 2030 in order to meet data centres' increasing consumption. This will allow gas to overtake coal as Malaysia’s main fuel by 2032. Separately Jalaluddin said that he expected Vietnam to begin exporting electricity to Singapore via Malaysia by the end of the decade. "This (Vietnam-Malaysia-Singapore) is basically still a greenfield project, so it will take us a while but we are going to see this happening in this decade," he said, adding that 1 GW to 2 GW of power would be exported through undersea cables. (Reporting and editing by Sudarshan Varadhan and Ashley Tang)
-
Australia's Treasury Wine Chair grilled by shareholders, but comfortably reelected
Treasury Wine Estates shareholders grilled chairman John Mullen about the Australian winemaker’s poor performance, his stock decline as well as heavy workload. But he was reelected with a large margin at their annual general meeting held on Thursday. Treasury, one of the top five winemakers in the world by volume, pulled its earnings guidance for 2026, and halted plans for a stock buyback. The company cited weak sales of Penfolds' flagship wines in China, and distribution problems in the U.S. Since the beginning of the year, the stock price has fallen by more than 40%. Institutional Shareholder Services, Australian Shareholders' Association and other proxy advisory firms had advised investors to vote against Mullen's election. They noted that he served as chairman of Qantas, logistics firm Brambles, and on private boards. Can John name anyone else in recent times who has chaired three ASX 100 Companies at the same time? One shareholder asked this question at the meeting. Mullen reacted to the criticism by saying that it was untimely given the leadership vacuum in the company. He added that he had a "complete" commitment to the firm and was dedicating "adequate time" for the organization. He said Treasury was facing a very difficult time with problems in its main markets. It also has no chief executive. Sam Fischer, the new CEO of Treasury, will start on October 27. Former CEO Tim Ford left on September 30, and Tim Ford left in August. He said: "At a moment when the company is experiencing all that it is, they would think that it was in shareholders' interests not to have chairs... That makes me scratch my heads." The majority of shareholders appeared to be in agreement with him, and he won re-election with only 14.5% against. (Reporting and editing by Edwina G. Gibbs in Sydney)
Father of pilot who died in Air India crash requests independent investigation by top court
Sources familiar with the case said that the 91-year old father of an Air India pilot who was killed in a crash in June that claimed 260 lives has asked India's Supreme Court for an independent investigation to consider other causes than the pilot.
The lawsuit is a significant escalation in protests against the Indian Government's handling the worst aviation accident in a decade that occurred shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, a western city.
After criticising the government's investigation, the father of the boy, Pushkar Sabharwal, has now called for an independent investigation to be conducted by a panel headed by a retired Supreme Court Judge.
He claimed that two officials of India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, who visited him, had suggested that his son Sumeet, Sabharwal cut the fuel for the plane's engines after takeoff.
The investigation was described as "very clean" by the government, and "very thorough" by investigators.
One of the sources that saw the filing said the father had told the court on October 11 that the investigation team seemed to "predominantly concentrate on the deceased pilots" while ignoring or excluding other plausible technical and procedural reasons.
The two sources who spoke under condition of anonymity said that the group also requested the investigation by the government be closed, and the case handed over to a panel led by a retired Supreme Court Judge, which includes aviation experts.
The Supreme Court website, on Thursday, showed that the father and Federation of Indian Pilots had jointly filed the case against the Government, but it did not give any details.
Air India, Boeing, the AAIB and the Civil Aviation Ministry did not respond immediately to comments. The pilots' union and Sabharwal's dad did not reply to email seeking comments.
A preliminary AAIB Report showed that the fuel engine switches on the Boeing Dreamliner had switched from run to shutoff almost simultaneously just after takeoff.
A source who was briefed in July on the early assessment by U.S. officials of the evidence said that the cockpit recordings of the dialogue between the pilots confirmed the belief that Captain Sabharwal cut off the fuel flow to the engines.
About 5,000 people are members of the Federation of Indian Pilots. (Reporting and editing by Aditya K. Kalra, Clarence Fernandez and Abhijith. G.)
(source: Reuters)