Latest News

Six months after the war began, the US-Iran conflict has descended into a trench-war on energy: Bousso

Six months after the U.S. vs. Iran war began, it has hardened into a stalemate which could last until 2027. The conflict is raging, energy markets are held hostage and inflation is high. Neither side wants to or can back down. The war that has caused thousands of deaths and extensive damage in the Middle East has taken on a new face. The war began on February 28, as a joint U.S. and Israeli effort to cripple Iran, aiming at eliminating Tehran's nuclear programs, weakening its proxy network and possibly topple the Government. It has become a more narrow?struggle centered on one issue: who controls Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is used to transport?roughly? a?fifth of the global oil and natural gas supplies.

The dueling blockades by the U.S. and Iran have severely curtailed the traffic through the Strait in the last six months. This has disrupted energy markets and increased costs for global economies. Brent crude is still around $90 per barrel, about 25% higher than its pre-war price. This is due to the fact that crude prices are not as high as expected, largely because of ample global stocks, reduced Chinese imports, and increased production outside the Gulf.

The market buffers which cushioned the first energy shock have now been largely depleted - this is a concerning sign. The Trump administration may be prompted by this risk to either double down on the crisis or to retreat completely. The impasse remains a stalemate that is difficult to resolve. The deadlock is not being broken by either side.

No Way Out

Iran is unlikely to blink before anyone else. Its economy is suffering?enormously. U.S. efforts have reduced oil exports, Tehran's primary source of income, by about 85% compared to pre-war levels. In August, they were down to 250,000 barrels/day (bpd), fueling inflation and a worsening of the economic situation. The government has proved to be far more resilient than expected. The Iranian government did not collapse after the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei in an Israeli airstrike on the first day of the war. Instead, it adapted and strengthened its position. Iran is unable to dominate its neighbors militarily but has shown that it can inflict pain on them economically by controlling the Strait of Hormuz through periodic attacks and threats. Donald Trump, the U.S. president, has shown little interest in escalating this conflict to the point that it could endanger U.S. soldiers or the global economic system. The conflict is becoming increasingly unpopular among U.S. citizens as the midterm elections in November approach. Energy-driven inflation has exacerbated cost of living concerns. Washington has one main objective: to restore energy flows through Hormuz while lowering fuel costs at home. How?

Beyond Hormuz The conflict has revealed the real bottleneck of the global energy system. The bottleneck is not crude oil supply, but refinery capacity. Around a fifth of Middle Eastern refinery capacity is offline due to war damage or export disruptions. Chinese refinery output is well below the level of a year ago, while Russian refinery production remains restricted by drone attacks from Ukraine. According to Energy Aspects, the combined impact of these disruptions in August reduced global refinery output by approximately 4 million bpd or 5% from a previous year. Fuel shortages are a result.

This distinction is important for Trump's administration, because the voters do not buy crude oil but gasoline.

The price of gasoline in the United States has risen by about 30% during the last year. Diesel prices are up more than 50%. Even if more crude oil begins to flow through Hormuz in the future, it will take much longer to rebuild refining capacities.

The options available to the administration for reducing domestic fuel prices are becoming fewer and fewer.

OPTICAL ILLUSION Recent White House actions highlight these limitations. U.S. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent announced new sanctions against Iran on Monday and threatened secondary actions against countries that continue to do business. He called the campaign an "economic D-Day." But sanctions will not deliver breakthroughs and secondary sanctions have little impact when Bessent makes it clear that Washington wants to avoid any actions that would seriously disrupt the global economy.

This reduces the chances that the U.S. would impose severe sanctions on China, Tehran’s largest oil client - one the few economic measures which could have an impact with Iran. Washington also wants to sway markets by saying that oil flow?through Hormuz is recovering quickly despite Iranian threats. Senior White House officials argued in the last week that Gulf exports were approaching pre-war levels, as more tankers left under U.S. Naval protection with their transponders 'off. Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated on Friday that the average seven-day oil exports from Hormuz have risen above 8 million barrels per day.

Shipping analytics companies monitoring Hormuz via satellite imagery and vessel tracking data, however, see few signs of a recovery.

Kpler reports that oil exports have been averaging just 2.2m bpd in August. Total regional crude exports including shipments through Saudi and Emirati ports bypassing Hormuz averaged 9 million bpd during August, down from 11 millions bpd last month and 17 million bpd by 2025. Washington may be working behind the scenes to reach a deal, but the disparity between its public claims and data indicates desperation.

TRENCH WARFARE

Trump will find it harder to claim that the conflict is successful the longer it continues. The Islamic government is still in power. Hormuz continues to be constrained. Fuel prices are high and the economic costs are continuing to rise. The U.S. has?overwhelming military and economic power, but little appetite for an extended war. Iran is economically weak, but has shown a willingness for it to endure extraordinary pain in pursuit of strategic goals. It is therefore a conflict of endurance, not manoeuvre. Despite what Trump & Bessent argued in this week, U.S. Economic pressure resembles grinding trench warfare which kept World War One alive far more than decisive Allied attacks that ended World War Two.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)