Latest News

Families of Air India crash victims sue Honeywell and Boeing

Families of four passengers who died in the crash

June 12 crash

In a lawsuit, the owner of an Air India Boeing 787-8 said that the accident was caused by allegedly defective fuel switches. The U.S.

Federal Aviation Administration

Has said that the accident which killed 260 people does not appear to be caused by him.

The lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court on Tuesday blames Honeywell and Boeing, who made the switches, as the cause of the crash that occurred seconds after Flight 171 left Ahmedabad, India, bound for London.

Plaintiffs cite a 2018 FAA advisor that suggested, but did no mandate, that operators of various Boeing models, such as the 787, check the locking mechanism on the fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not accidentally be moved.

The Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), India

Report of preliminary investigation

The investigation into the crash found that Air India did not perform the recommended inspections and that maintenance records indicated that the throttle control modules, which include the fuel switches, were replaced on the aircraft involved in the accident in 2019 and in 2023.

The report stated that "all applicable airworthiness instructions and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, as well as engine" were adhered to.

Honeywell and Boeing both declined to comment. The cockpit recording between the two pilots of the jet suggests that, contrary to previous reports, the captain had cut off the fuel flow to the engines.

The lawsuit claims that the switches were placed in an area of the cockpit that was more likely to have been accidentally pushed. This "effectively guaranteed" that normal cockpit activities could lead to inadvertently cutting off fuel.

Experts in aviation safety told us that this could not happen.

Flip

Based on their design and location.

This lawsuit is the first to have been filed in the United States regarding the crash.

The lawsuit seeks damages that are not specified for the deaths suffered by Naavya Dhirubhai, Kuberbhai, and Babiben, all of whom were passengers.

Also, 19 passengers and 12 crew members were killed. One passenger survived. The plaintiffs are Indian or British citizens and reside in India or Britain.

The preliminary report of Indian investigators appeared to exonerate Boeing, and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace. However, some family groups have criticized the investigators and press for being too focused on pilots' behavior.

Legal experts state that, although most accidents are the result of a variety of factors, lawyers who represent victims' families often target manufacturers as they don't have to face the same limitations on liability as airlines. These strategies may also increase the likelihood of bringing a case in U.S. court, which is widely regarded as being more generous to plaintiffs compared to many foreign courts.

Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al is the case at Delaware Superior Court No. N25C-09-145. (Reporting and editing by Les Adler, Marguerita Choy, and Les Adler; Additional reporting in Seattle by Dan Catchpole; Reporting by Jonathan Stempel).

(source: Reuters)