Latest News
-
Coalition opposes Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern rail merger
A coalition of business groups, rival railways, and organized labor, announced on Wednesday that they oppose Union Pacific's proposed merger with Norfolk Southern. This comes just a day before the two are set to submit a revised application at the Surface Transportation Board. The American Chemistry Council, American Farm Bureau Federation and Teamsters Rail Conference are part of the coalition, which also includes BNSF Railway and CPKC Railway. Alliance for Chemical Distribution and National Industrial Transportation League are also members. This deal will create the nation's first coast-to-coast rail freight operator. It could also reshape America's freight industry by helping to streamline operations, and eliminating interchange delays at hubs like Chicago. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Railroads filed their nearly 7,000 page application on December 19. They said the combination would improve reliability of service, divert trucks from rail to truck, retain shipper's options, and deliver broad benefits for the public while protecting union jobs. The proposed merger has been publicly supported by President Donald Trump, something that would have been unthinkable during the Biden administration's crackdown on consolidation. The Trump administration tends to approve large transactions or impose remedy rather than blocking them outright. The deal has raised concerns among some Republican state attorneys general and other state officials. Railroads have struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising fuel and labor costs, and growing pressure from shippers regarding service reliability. This is the first major railroad merger to be reviewed using the more stringent?framework that was put in place over a decade ago. The framework requires applicants prove their transaction will enhance competition, not just preserve it, while providing demonstrable benefits for the public.
-
Hormuz traffic is at a trickle, as the US-Iran deadlock intensifies
Shipping data revealed on Wednesday that six ships, a small fraction of the normal traffic, have crossed the Strait of Hormuz over the past 24 hours. The U.S. The United States and Iran are still unable to reach a deal that would reopen this vital waterway. According to SynMax's satellite analysis and Kpler ship tracking data, the vessel traffic was mostly through Iranian waters, and included a chemical tanker called Vast Plus, which is under US sanctions. The majority of ships were dry bulk carriers. It was not possible to determine if there had been more than six vessels transiting the strait. However, ship traffic in recent days has averaged seven vessels per day. This is a'minuscule' percentage of the normal waterway flow at the Gulf entrance, which was?between 125 and 140 daily passages prior to the Iran War?beginning on February 28. U.S. president Donald Trump called on Iran to sign a deal and "get smart" soon, after days of inaction and media reports that the U.S. was extending its blockade against Iran's ports. In its latest assessment report, the US Navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center stated that "despite the 8 April 2026 US-Iran truce, commercial traffic'remains restricted, with constrained Transits and continued Routing Uncertainty". Iranian officials have floated the idea of charging a toll on ships that pass through the Strait. Treasury Department warns that shipping companies who pay Iran to pass through Hormuz will be sanctioned, even if they are not Americans. Treasury has said that payments to the Revolutionary Guards or the Iranian government "directly or indirectly" for a safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz are not authorized for U.S. citizens, U.S. financial institution, or U.S. owned or controlled foreign entities. It said that "Such payments create significant sanctions exposures for non-U.S. citizens." Jonathan Saul is the reporter.
-
US bans Chinese airbag components linked to 10 fatal crashes
After ten fatal accidents, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration banned Chinese airbag inflators that were substandard. They said they posed a serious risk to American drivers. The U.S. Auto Safety Agency said that it had been made aware of 12 accidents in the United States where there were deaths or serious injuries caused by ruptured replacement inflators manufactured in China by Jilin Province Detiannuo Automobile Safety System Co Ltd (also referred to as DTN) and illegally imported in the U.S. All the deaths have occurred in GM and Hyundai vehicles. In a NHTSA filing, the company said it "cannot prove that the inflators questioned" were manufactured by it. "Nor can it be proved?that accidents were caused by defective inflated." DTN stated that it had never sold any of the substandard inflators to the U.S. marketplace. The company cited NHTSA investigation findings that at least five Chinese companies produce these devices. NHTSA stated that the DTN airbag inflators failed in crashes where drivers survived. "Large metal fragments were sent into driver's chests, necks and eyes." The agency issued a?warning urgent to owners and repairers Shops in January. NHTSA reported that the latest death in Clarksdale in Mississippi occurred on February 16, in a '2020 Chevrolet Malibu. The replacement airbag inflators for nine of the fatal? NHTSA confirmed that three crashes were found in Hyundai Sonatas and two in used Chevrolet Malibus, but said they could not confirm whether the risk was limited to these models. NHTSA: "Whoever brings them into the country, and installs them, is putting American Families in danger." If you are a consumer who is?buying a used vehicle that was?in an accident where the 'airbag deployed, it should be checked. It should be inspected right away to make sure it's a valid NHTSA says that the replacement part is equivalent to the original.
-
Avis Budget's sixth consecutive day of declines follows a quarterly loss
Avis Budget shares were headed for a sixth consecutive session of declines after the car rental firm announced a second 'consecutive quarter loss' and a major investor slashed its stake. Stocks of the company have been on a roller coaster this month. Shares reached an all-time-high of $847.7 in April and then plunged about 80%. Analysts attributed the stock’s eye-watering rise to a “short squeeze” – where investors who bet against the company were forced to unwind their positions because of a rapidly increasing share price. According to data analytics company Ortex, short interest in the stock was last recorded at?around 69% of its total free float. This is down from an all-time record of 94.2% last week. Avis shares fell 7% last week to $169.2, a new four-week low. Stocktwits, a retail investor forum, ranked the stock as?the fifth trending ticker. The Parsippany-based New Jersey-based company reported a smaller first-quarter loss on Wednesday of $8.01 per common share, compared to a loss per share of $14.35 a year earlier. The U.S. rental car industry has continued to experience steady demand for their services, but profits have been squeezed due to high operating costs, increasing interest expenses, and increased vehicle depreciation. Avis, Hertz, and other companies have suffered losses due to their earlier investments in?electric cars. Weaker-than-expected demand has forced them to dispose of tens or thousands of EVs, sometimes at reduced prices, which accelerated depreciation. Filings?on?Tuesday showed that a major investor, Pentwater Capital Management had sold millions of Avis?shares?between April?22-April 23. LSEG data shows that two hedge funds – SRS Investment Management (SRS) and Pentwater (Pentwater) – own 64% of Avis’ total outstanding shares. Pentwater reduced its stake in Avis from 7.77 million shares to 4.33 millions shares. Pentwater didn't immediately respond to an inquiry for comment. Avis reported a 4% 'rise' in revenue for the first quarter, to $2.53 Billion, beating analysts' estimates of $2.43 Billion, according to LSEG. According to LSEG calculations the company recorded an adjusted loss per share of $7.85, compared to expectations of a $6.84 loss per share. (Reporting from Shashwat Chand in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Shivansh Tiwary, Editing by Diti Pjara)
-
AerCap, a lessor of aircraft, says that high oil prices can bring about opportunities.
AerCap's head, who is the world's largest leasing company, stated on Wednesday that while higher fuel prices are not having a significant impact on airlines, they could benefit from a sustained spike. Aengus Kelley, AerCap's chief executive, said that demand for AerCap aircraft is strong and that airlines have not changed their behavior because of the Middle East conflict. In the first quarter, more than half of AerCap's 202 leasing deals were signed after the Middle East conflict began in March. Kelly stated that if jet-fuel prices remain at the current levels for a period of three to six month, airline 'profitability and balance sheet would be under pressure. This could potentially accelerate the retirement of older aircraft. He told analysts on a conference call that if fuel prices remain high for more than six months, AerCap will have additional growth potential. The company had beaten its first-quarter expectations and increased its outlook for the full year. He said that it was likely we would see more sale/leasebacks as airlines seek to fund growth, while prioritising cash and preserving liquidity. Kelly responded that AerCap did not agree to material assistance when asked if customers had requested concessions in order to offset rising costs. Kelly said that if fuel costs remain high, more requests may be made and they will be evaluated on a case by case basis. Kelly said that airlines that were able to reroute to Europe and Asia via the Gulf of Mexico, would be the "winners" in the current disruption. Kelly added that there was a strong demand for extra capacity. "But I wouldn't write off Middle Eastern carriers. They will return," he said. Reporting by Padraic HALpin. Conor Humphries, Mark Potter and Conor Humphries edited the report.
-
The largest US grid operator begins processing new power plant project
The largest U.S. grid operator –?PJM interconnection – announced on Wednesday that it would begin processing new power plant applications this coming week, after working through a backlog of years-long projects. PJM controls the flow on electricity transmission lines in 13 Midwest and Mid-Atlantic States. However, the company is experiencing electricity shortages because of a recent surge of power demand by data centers, which has outpaced new supply. The grid operator that serves about 1/5 of Americans began accepting applications for new power plants to connect to grid several months back. The deadline for submissions was Monday. PJM reported that the grid had received over 800 applications for new power generation projects to connect to its network under a newly reformed process of interconnection. PJM reported that 349 of the projects were battery storage. 157 were gas-fired power stations. 142 were solar farms. 65 were wind farms. Some 45 of the projects were hybrids between solar-storage and nuclear energy. Other projects included 11 projects that were hydropower and 45 others were classified as "other". David Mills, interim president and CEO of PJM, said: "We're encouraged by the variety of generation types seeking to join PJM's generation fleet." This is great news, because we are in need of all the generation that we can get. The new projects can generate about 220 gigawatts. After PJM became overloaded with projects that sought to?connect to grid, it effectively stopped reviewing applications in 2022 as it worked through the backlog of applications and implemented a number of reforms. According to an update released by PJM this month, PJM will have processed 170 gigawatts worth of projects by 2025. That's enough power to supply 130 million homes. PJM reported that 31% had been offered or signed agreements for grid connections. Some politicians and energy trade groups were critical of the decision to freeze the entry point into the grid for 2022. This was especially true among those who supported wind and solar power, which accounted for the majority projects that applied to PJM. "Reopening of the 'queue' is a welcome indication of 'progress. Our industry is eager to know if PJM can study and connect more energy projects in the future," said Jon Gordon. He is a senior policy director for Advanced Energy United which represents developers.
-
Walmart invests $350 Million in a third U.S. dairy processing facility
Walmart announced on Wednesday that it had opened a third milk processing plant in the United States, with an investment of more than $350m. This is part of a decade long effort to strengthen its perishables supply chain. The 'facility' in Robinson, Texas will process and bottle all sizes and types of milk for Sam's Club's Member's Mark and Great Value private label brands. Walmart says the facility will create 400 new jobs. The company will supply more than 650 Sam's Clubs and Walmart stores in the South Central U.S. Retail bellwether?has approximately 5,200 stores and club across the U.S. In early 2016, the company announced its first foray into milk processing, at a period when margins were being squeezed by high investments in labor as well as in e-commerce. Walmart also tries to keep prices low for consumers amid fierce competition from competitors such as Kroger. The first milk processing facility opened in Fort Wayne, Indiana in 2018 and the second in Valdosta Georgia in December of last year. As of fiscal 2025 more than two thirds of the company's total U.S. spending was on products?grown, produced or assembled on-shore. In 2024, Walmart also announced that it ?would build ?five new warehouses equipped with automation technology that can handle temperature-sensitive products like milk, meat and vegetables and ?fruits as it worked to speed up deliveries ?for groceries. Walmart's?delivery service is a popular choice for many Americans, especially those with higher incomes. The company reported that the number of shoppers who requested delivery within three hours or less was up by more than 60% during its fiscal 2026. In addition, the contribution to U.S. e-commerce sales almost doubled for their most recent quarter. Reporting by Juveria tabassum from Bengaluru, and editing by Shailesh Kuber
-
Avis Budget's sixth consecutive day of declines follows a quarterly loss
Avis Budget shares were headed for a sixth consecutive?session of declines Wednesday, after the car rental?firm announced a second successive quarterly loss. A major 'investor' also reduced its stake in the company. This month, the company's stock has been on a roller coaster, with its shares reaching an all-time-high of $847.7 in April and plummeting 78% since that date, in what is being called a "memestock" frenzy. Analysts attributed the stock’s eye-watering rise to a “short squeeze” – where investors who bet against the company were forced to unwind positions because of a rapidly rising share price. According to data analytics company Ortex, short interest in the stock was last at 69% of its?free float?, down from an all-time record of 94.2% recorded last week. Avis shares were down 4.4% in early trading to $ 174 and was the third trending ticker at Stocktwits, a retail investor forum. Parsippany in New Jersey reported a smaller first-quarter loss on Wednesday of $8.01 per shares, compared to a loss per share of $14.35 a year earlier. Filings from Tuesday revealed that between April 22-23, Avis's majority shareholder, "Pentwater Capital Management", had sold millions of shares. Data compiled by LSEG revealed that two hedge funds – SRS Investment Management and Pentwater – owned more than 64% Avis’ total outstanding?shares. Pentwater reduced its holding from 7.77 million to 4.33 million shares. Pentwater didn't immediately respond to an?request for comments. Avis reported a 4% increase in revenue for the first quarter, reaching $2.53 billion. This was compared to an average analyst estimate of $2.43 'billion. According to LSEG calculations the?company clocked a loss adjusted of $7.85 per?share, compared to expectations of a $6.84 loss per share. (Reporting from Shashwat Chand in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Niket Nishan; Editing by Diti Pjara)
Bousso: Iran's 'tollbooth' at Hormuz will hardwire higher energy costs
For now, the war that shut down the Strait of Hormuz is over. Tehran's insistence on acting as the toll booth keeper at this world-critical oil chokepoint may leave energy markets exposed and lead to higher prices for many years. According to U.S. president Donald Trump, the U.S., Iran and Pakistan agreed on Tuesday to a ceasefire for two weeks, mediated by Pakistan. Tehran must halt its blockade against oil and gas traffic in the Strait. According to an Iranian official, the waterway through which a fifth (21 miles) of the world's oil and natural gas passed before the U.S./Israeli war began on Iran six weeks ago could be reopened in a limited way by Friday under Iranian control. Tehran also said on Tuesday that it would charge ships passing through the strait a fee under a permanent deal. The strait is only 34 km wide (21 miles) at its narrowest part between Iran and Oman.
Some media reports suggest that Oman is strongly opposing any such toll system under the existing agreements. Others claim that a similar toll system already exists.
In an interview with ABC News, Trump stated that the U.S. also considered setting up a joint-venture to charge ships tolls to access Hormuz. It is unclear how such a plan would work in practice. Iran could have the upper hand. Tehran has shown that it can strike dozens vessels with drones, sea mines and missiles. This gives them a powerful advantage even without a formal ban.
A toll system in Iran would violate one of the most fundamental principles of international law, namely?freedoms of navigation'. This principle allows ships to transit international waters free of interference by coastal states. The United States has always positioned itself as the global guardian of this principle. It enforces it with naval patrols and through diplomatic pressure.
Washington would be forced to make a major strategic shift if it allowed Iran to control the Hormuz Strait. This would also cause a shock to the Middle East's oil and gas industry, which is the lifeline for countries like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.
This would create a layer of permanent political risk, both for Gulf producers and customers. Tehran would have disproportionate control over which ships could transit at what time. Iran could, for example, outright ban Israeli-owned ships, slow Saudi shipments in order to exert pressure on Riyadh or use delays as a leverage in unrelated disputes.
Tehran's power over the region's most important trade artery would be deeply unwelcome to its leading exporters, who are all close U.S. allys that have suffered heavy economic and infrastructure damages during Iranian attacks. The implications for Asian buyers would be serious. China, Japan and South Korea rely heavily upon Gulf supplies. Even modest and unpredictable disruptions could have a significant impact on the refining margins and spot prices of liquefied gas and inflation expectations.
It is unclear how much damage will be caused by the transit of vessels from Iran to friendly nations like China, India, Iraq, and Pakistan.
RISKIER COSTS
The toll could be significant financially. According to reports, the toll could cost as much as $2 million for each transit. This is roughly equivalent to the cost of chartering an extremely large crude carrier to travel from the Middle East all the way to China in 2025.
In addition to the death toll, increased security risks will increase insurance premiums for LNG carriers and tankers entering the Gulf. This will further drive up transportation costs. The war-risk premiums, which were volatile even before the conflict, are likely to persist as a structural characteristic of the market.
Some ships could try to follow the coastline of Oman while transiting Hormuz. This would reduce the overall traffic volume and still expose ships to Iranian missiles, drones, and fast-attack craft.
ALTERNATIVE ROUTES OF EXPORT These risks, combined with the uncertainty surrounding relations with Iran, will likely lead Saudi Arabia and UAE to continue using alternative oil export routes that were used during the conflict for months, if they are not years.
Saudi Aramco, the state oil giant, began pumping large quantities of crude oil through its East-West Pipeline to the Red Sea Port of Yanbu soon after the war started on February 28. This was done in accordance with contingency plans that were developed for just such a crisis.
The pipeline is capable of transporting 7 million barrels a day. Of this, 5 million barrels a day are exported, and the remainder feeds domestic refineries. Kpler data shows that Saudi Arabia exported an average of 3.3 million barrels per day from its west coast ports in March. This is nearly half the volume it will export by 2025. Even these alternatives are vulnerable. An industry source said that the East-West pipeline had been hit by an Iranian attack just hours after ceasefire announcement. Flows were expected to be affected.
The UAE also diverted additional volumes via its pipeline to Fujairah's oil terminal outside of the Gulf. Kpler reports that exports from Fujairah increased to 1.6m bpd from averaging 1.1m bpd since 2025. These routes are essential for producers and buyers to hedge against the Hormuz threat, but they do not offer a full solution due to their limited capacity and vulnerability to regional tensions. The mere possibility of Iranian oversight is already changing risk perceptions, even if the full toll system never comes into existence. Saudi Arabia, its allies and Iran would resist any attempt to give Tehran control of the Strait. While the ceasefire is holding, for Gulf oil exporters and gas producers, the battle for Hormuz has just begun. Ron Bousso is a columnist at.
You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.
(source: Reuters)