Latest News

Joachim Klement: The next Iran war could be closer than you think.

The Iran war is over, but many people may mistake a pre-election break for peace. Tehran's economic leverage will remain strong until the U.S. midterm election in November but may weaken after the results are announced, increasing the risk of renewed confrontation.

How can the rest of the globe avoid being collateral damage in this new dangerous environment?

It is unclear whether the 60-day negotiations between the U.S.

The most important thing for the markets is the fact that the interim agreement has restored the energy flow through the Strait of Hormuz. This was the crucial energy chokepoint which had been effectively closed off during the conflict. Crude prices have fallen to levels seen before the war.

However, the clock is ticking.

Many, including myself, argued from the beginning of the war that the rising oil price would have a greater impact on the politics of the conflict than missiles or diplomacy. This seems to be borne out now.

Although the war may have been longer than anticipated, economic and political pressures seem to have heavily influenced Donald Trump's decision, as demonstrated by the U.S. willingness of giving Iran many items from its wish list for the simple act of reopening strait.

The midterm elections held in November have always been a key deadline for the administration. This is still the case. What will happen to the power balance between Washington and Tehran once the midterm elections are over?

Peace for Now

The American public was unpopular about the war. Trump's net rating in anEconomist/YouGov survey fell from -negative 17 at the beginning of the war to -negative 24 before a ceasefire framework announcement, and it has since recovered to -negative 21.

The rise in energy prices played a major role. Trump's net rating for inflation and price has plummeted to a negative 40.

The trajectory of gasoline prices in the coming months will determine how much damage the Trump administration is able to control. Energy Information Administration data shows that pump prices have fallen from near $4.50 per gallon during the war to $3.90.

If peace talks fail, this could change. Tehran may not need to even close the Strait of?Hormuz in order to influence energy costs. The Iranian government may not even need to close the Strait of?Hormuz in order to influence energy prices. This risk premium can quickly affect crude oil and gasoline prices as well as freight costs, fertilisers, and industrial input costs. This gives Iran more power in an election year.

Brent crude is down 40% since the peak of the war. Energy traders are willing to ignore minor incidents between the U.S. This could change quickly, however, if Iran appears to be willing to use its Hormuz cards again.

THE RISK RETURNS

However, the delicate balance of power could change dramatically after the U.S. Midterm elections on November 3.

If Republicans lose their seats, Trump may face a hostile or divided Congress that makes it more difficult to pass legislation and budgets.

RealClear Polling shows that Democrats currently lead the generic congressional ballot with a margin of over five percentage points. They are believed to have an excellent chance of regaining control of the House of Representatives where they need only a net gain of 5 seats.

Trump may be more tempted to pursue political victories overseas, where there are fewer restrictions from Congress and the courts.

Trump has been criticized both domestically and internationally for an interim agreement that favors Iran.

Brent's rapid retreat also suggests that energy traders are able to quickly dismiss political risks. This could make renewed military action more appealing after the midterm elections.

Iran has the upper hand for now. But that could change in the fall if the parties cannot reach a final agreement. This is a possibility, given the distance between the parties on important sticking points, such as Iran's nuke program.

This seesawing leverage does not lead to a permanent war, but rather persistent risk.

The SAFER STRATEGIC BET

This leaves the large energy consumers - such as Europe and Asia - susceptible to sudden spikes in gas and oil prices, and disruptions in the supply of fertilizers and other commodities.

Reduce the influence imported fossil fuels have on their economies.

Europe appears to have got the memo. Many governments in the area are reconsidering their domestic oil and natural gas production as a temporary solution and increasing investments in renewables, nuclear power and other energy sources to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels.

This shift will increase the supply chain dependence on China as the dominant player in renewables. The nature of this dependence is not the same as a reliance on imported energy.

If imports of gas and oil are stopped, the power plants and refineries who rely on these products will be immediately under pressure. If China restricted exports of'solar cells or?wind turbines, existing wind and solar farms would continue to operate. Which is a safer'strategic bet'?

The Iran War may have ended, but a longer battle could be just beginning. It is important for countries that are vulnerable to prepare.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks. (Writing and Editing by Margueritachoy and Anna Szymanski.)

(source: Reuters)