Latest News

US Judge says Trump's attempt to end New York City congestion charges is unlawful

A U.S. Judge on Tuesday said that the U.S.?Transportation Department's effort to force the end of Manhattan's congestion pricing?program is illegal. This was a?blow against President Donald Trump's efforts?to?eliminate this charge.

In May, U.S. district judge Lewis Liman issued a temporary injunction preventing the federal funding from being withheld for New York project due to the program. He ruled on Tuesday that the Trump Administration's attempt to end the program in February 2025 was illegal.

In a bid to reduce congestion and raise money for mass transit, the first-of its-kind program is in place in the United States since January 2025. It charges?most passenger cars a $9 toll during peak hours to enter Manhattan south from 60th Street.

USDOT declined to comment immediately. Liman found illegal the threat made by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy in April that he would withhold funds for New York's transportation projects if New York didn't end its congestion pricing program.

In his 149-page report, Liman stated that it was difficult to imagine a more arbitrarily and capriciously made decision than the one at issue.

Trump has repeatedly called for the fee to be eliminated. New York cited Trump’s February 2025 social media post that praised his efforts to end congestion pricing with the phrase "Long LIVE THE KING!" The White House shared a mock-up photo on social media of Trump wearing a crown.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul stated that the program resulted in 27 millions fewer vehicles entering congestion?zones, reducing traffic?times as much as 15?minutes each and raising $550?millions to support $15 bn in debt financing of critical?mass transport capital improvements.

The USDOT, under the former Democratic President Joe Biden, approved the congestion program for November 2024. It is monitored by electronic license plate readers. The U.S. must approve this program because it involves tolls for federal highways.

The program is similar to those in London and Singapore. Duffy and other opponents say that it is unfair to workers, as well as leaving them without an option for a free highway.

(source: Reuters)