Latest News
-
Coalition opposes Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern rail merger
A coalition of business groups, rival railways, and organized labor, announced on Wednesday that they oppose Union Pacific's proposed merger with Norfolk Southern. This comes just a day before the two are set to submit a revised application at the Surface Transportation Board. The American Chemistry Council, American Farm Bureau Federation and Teamsters Rail Conference are part of the coalition, which also includes BNSF Railway and CPKC Railway. Alliance for Chemical Distribution and National Industrial Transportation League are also members. This deal will create the nation's first coast-to-coast rail freight operator. It could also reshape America's freight industry by helping to streamline operations, and eliminating interchange delays at hubs like Chicago. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Railroads filed their nearly 7,000 page application on December 19. They said the combination would improve reliability of service, divert trucks from rail to truck, retain shipper's options, and deliver broad benefits for the public while protecting union jobs. The proposed merger has been publicly supported by President Donald Trump, something that would have been unthinkable during the Biden administration's crackdown on consolidation. The Trump administration tends to approve large transactions or impose remedy rather than blocking them outright. The deal has raised concerns among some Republican state attorneys general and other state officials. Railroads have struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising fuel and labor costs, and growing pressure from shippers regarding service reliability. This is the first major railroad merger to be reviewed using the more stringent?framework that was put in place over a decade ago. The framework requires applicants prove their transaction will enhance competition, not just preserve it, while providing demonstrable benefits for the public.
-
Hormuz traffic is at a trickle, as the US-Iran deadlock intensifies
Shipping data revealed on Wednesday that six ships, a small fraction of the normal traffic, have crossed the Strait of Hormuz over the past 24 hours. The U.S. The United States and Iran are still unable to reach a deal that would reopen this vital waterway. According to SynMax's satellite analysis and Kpler ship tracking data, the vessel traffic was mostly through Iranian waters, and included a chemical tanker called Vast Plus, which is under US sanctions. The majority of ships were dry bulk carriers. It was not possible to determine if there had been more than six vessels transiting the strait. However, ship traffic in recent days has averaged seven vessels per day. This is a'minuscule' percentage of the normal waterway flow at the Gulf entrance, which was?between 125 and 140 daily passages prior to the Iran War?beginning on February 28. U.S. president Donald Trump called on Iran to sign a deal and "get smart" soon, after days of inaction and media reports that the U.S. was extending its blockade against Iran's ports. In its latest assessment report, the US Navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center stated that "despite the 8 April 2026 US-Iran truce, commercial traffic'remains restricted, with constrained Transits and continued Routing Uncertainty". Iranian officials have floated the idea of charging a toll on ships that pass through the Strait. Treasury Department warns that shipping companies who pay Iran to pass through Hormuz will be sanctioned, even if they are not Americans. Treasury has said that payments to the Revolutionary Guards or the Iranian government "directly or indirectly" for a safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz are not authorized for U.S. citizens, U.S. financial institution, or U.S. owned or controlled foreign entities. It said that "Such payments create significant sanctions exposures for non-U.S. citizens." Jonathan Saul is the reporter.
-
US bans Chinese airbag components linked to 10 fatal crashes
After ten fatal accidents, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration banned Chinese airbag inflators that were substandard. They said they posed a serious risk to American drivers. The U.S. Auto Safety Agency said that it had been made aware of 12 accidents in the United States where there were deaths or serious injuries caused by ruptured replacement inflators manufactured in China by Jilin Province Detiannuo Automobile Safety System Co Ltd (also referred to as DTN) and illegally imported in the U.S. All the deaths have occurred in GM and Hyundai vehicles. In a NHTSA filing, the company said it "cannot prove that the inflators questioned" were manufactured by it. "Nor can it be proved?that accidents were caused by defective inflated." DTN stated that it had never sold any of the substandard inflators to the U.S. marketplace. The company cited NHTSA investigation findings that at least five Chinese companies produce these devices. NHTSA stated that the DTN airbag inflators failed in crashes where drivers survived. "Large metal fragments were sent into driver's chests, necks and eyes." The agency issued a?warning urgent to owners and repairers Shops in January. NHTSA reported that the latest death in Clarksdale in Mississippi occurred on February 16, in a '2020 Chevrolet Malibu. The replacement airbag inflators for nine of the fatal? NHTSA confirmed that three crashes were found in Hyundai Sonatas and two in used Chevrolet Malibus, but said they could not confirm whether the risk was limited to these models. NHTSA: "Whoever brings them into the country, and installs them, is putting American Families in danger." If you are a consumer who is?buying a used vehicle that was?in an accident where the 'airbag deployed, it should be checked. It should be inspected right away to make sure it's a valid NHTSA says that the replacement part is equivalent to the original.
-
Avis Budget's sixth consecutive day of declines follows a quarterly loss
Avis Budget shares were headed for a sixth consecutive session of declines after the car rental firm announced a second 'consecutive quarter loss' and a major investor slashed its stake. Stocks of the company have been on a roller coaster this month. Shares reached an all-time-high of $847.7 in April and then plunged about 80%. Analysts attributed the stock’s eye-watering rise to a “short squeeze” – where investors who bet against the company were forced to unwind their positions because of a rapidly increasing share price. According to data analytics company Ortex, short interest in the stock was last recorded at?around 69% of its total free float. This is down from an all-time record of 94.2% last week. Avis shares fell 7% last week to $169.2, a new four-week low. Stocktwits, a retail investor forum, ranked the stock as?the fifth trending ticker. The Parsippany-based New Jersey-based company reported a smaller first-quarter loss on Wednesday of $8.01 per common share, compared to a loss per share of $14.35 a year earlier. The U.S. rental car industry has continued to experience steady demand for their services, but profits have been squeezed due to high operating costs, increasing interest expenses, and increased vehicle depreciation. Avis, Hertz, and other companies have suffered losses due to their earlier investments in?electric cars. Weaker-than-expected demand has forced them to dispose of tens or thousands of EVs, sometimes at reduced prices, which accelerated depreciation. Filings?on?Tuesday showed that a major investor, Pentwater Capital Management had sold millions of Avis?shares?between April?22-April 23. LSEG data shows that two hedge funds – SRS Investment Management (SRS) and Pentwater (Pentwater) – own 64% of Avis’ total outstanding shares. Pentwater reduced its stake in Avis from 7.77 million shares to 4.33 millions shares. Pentwater didn't immediately respond to an inquiry for comment. Avis reported a 4% 'rise' in revenue for the first quarter, to $2.53 Billion, beating analysts' estimates of $2.43 Billion, according to LSEG. According to LSEG calculations the company recorded an adjusted loss per share of $7.85, compared to expectations of a $6.84 loss per share. (Reporting from Shashwat Chand in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Shivansh Tiwary, Editing by Diti Pjara)
-
AerCap, a lessor of aircraft, says that high oil prices can bring about opportunities.
AerCap's head, who is the world's largest leasing company, stated on Wednesday that while higher fuel prices are not having a significant impact on airlines, they could benefit from a sustained spike. Aengus Kelley, AerCap's chief executive, said that demand for AerCap aircraft is strong and that airlines have not changed their behavior because of the Middle East conflict. In the first quarter, more than half of AerCap's 202 leasing deals were signed after the Middle East conflict began in March. Kelly stated that if jet-fuel prices remain at the current levels for a period of three to six month, airline 'profitability and balance sheet would be under pressure. This could potentially accelerate the retirement of older aircraft. He told analysts on a conference call that if fuel prices remain high for more than six months, AerCap will have additional growth potential. The company had beaten its first-quarter expectations and increased its outlook for the full year. He said that it was likely we would see more sale/leasebacks as airlines seek to fund growth, while prioritising cash and preserving liquidity. Kelly responded that AerCap did not agree to material assistance when asked if customers had requested concessions in order to offset rising costs. Kelly said that if fuel costs remain high, more requests may be made and they will be evaluated on a case by case basis. Kelly said that airlines that were able to reroute to Europe and Asia via the Gulf of Mexico, would be the "winners" in the current disruption. Kelly added that there was a strong demand for extra capacity. "But I wouldn't write off Middle Eastern carriers. They will return," he said. Reporting by Padraic HALpin. Conor Humphries, Mark Potter and Conor Humphries edited the report.
-
The largest US grid operator begins processing new power plant project
The largest U.S. grid operator –?PJM interconnection – announced on Wednesday that it would begin processing new power plant applications this coming week, after working through a backlog of years-long projects. PJM controls the flow on electricity transmission lines in 13 Midwest and Mid-Atlantic States. However, the company is experiencing electricity shortages because of a recent surge of power demand by data centers, which has outpaced new supply. The grid operator that serves about 1/5 of Americans began accepting applications for new power plants to connect to grid several months back. The deadline for submissions was Monday. PJM reported that the grid had received over 800 applications for new power generation projects to connect to its network under a newly reformed process of interconnection. PJM reported that 349 of the projects were battery storage. 157 were gas-fired power stations. 142 were solar farms. 65 were wind farms. Some 45 of the projects were hybrids between solar-storage and nuclear energy. Other projects included 11 projects that were hydropower and 45 others were classified as "other". David Mills, interim president and CEO of PJM, said: "We're encouraged by the variety of generation types seeking to join PJM's generation fleet." This is great news, because we are in need of all the generation that we can get. The new projects can generate about 220 gigawatts. After PJM became overloaded with projects that sought to?connect to grid, it effectively stopped reviewing applications in 2022 as it worked through the backlog of applications and implemented a number of reforms. According to an update released by PJM this month, PJM will have processed 170 gigawatts worth of projects by 2025. That's enough power to supply 130 million homes. PJM reported that 31% had been offered or signed agreements for grid connections. Some politicians and energy trade groups were critical of the decision to freeze the entry point into the grid for 2022. This was especially true among those who supported wind and solar power, which accounted for the majority projects that applied to PJM. "Reopening of the 'queue' is a welcome indication of 'progress. Our industry is eager to know if PJM can study and connect more energy projects in the future," said Jon Gordon. He is a senior policy director for Advanced Energy United which represents developers.
-
Walmart invests $350 Million in a third U.S. dairy processing facility
Walmart announced on Wednesday that it had opened a third milk processing plant in the United States, with an investment of more than $350m. This is part of a decade long effort to strengthen its perishables supply chain. The 'facility' in Robinson, Texas will process and bottle all sizes and types of milk for Sam's Club's Member's Mark and Great Value private label brands. Walmart says the facility will create 400 new jobs. The company will supply more than 650 Sam's Clubs and Walmart stores in the South Central U.S. Retail bellwether?has approximately 5,200 stores and club across the U.S. In early 2016, the company announced its first foray into milk processing, at a period when margins were being squeezed by high investments in labor as well as in e-commerce. Walmart also tries to keep prices low for consumers amid fierce competition from competitors such as Kroger. The first milk processing facility opened in Fort Wayne, Indiana in 2018 and the second in Valdosta Georgia in December of last year. As of fiscal 2025 more than two thirds of the company's total U.S. spending was on products?grown, produced or assembled on-shore. In 2024, Walmart also announced that it ?would build ?five new warehouses equipped with automation technology that can handle temperature-sensitive products like milk, meat and vegetables and ?fruits as it worked to speed up deliveries ?for groceries. Walmart's?delivery service is a popular choice for many Americans, especially those with higher incomes. The company reported that the number of shoppers who requested delivery within three hours or less was up by more than 60% during its fiscal 2026. In addition, the contribution to U.S. e-commerce sales almost doubled for their most recent quarter. Reporting by Juveria tabassum from Bengaluru, and editing by Shailesh Kuber
-
Avis Budget's sixth consecutive day of declines follows a quarterly loss
Avis Budget shares were headed for a sixth consecutive?session of declines Wednesday, after the car rental?firm announced a second successive quarterly loss. A major 'investor' also reduced its stake in the company. This month, the company's stock has been on a roller coaster, with its shares reaching an all-time-high of $847.7 in April and plummeting 78% since that date, in what is being called a "memestock" frenzy. Analysts attributed the stock’s eye-watering rise to a “short squeeze” – where investors who bet against the company were forced to unwind positions because of a rapidly rising share price. According to data analytics company Ortex, short interest in the stock was last at 69% of its?free float?, down from an all-time record of 94.2% recorded last week. Avis shares were down 4.4% in early trading to $ 174 and was the third trending ticker at Stocktwits, a retail investor forum. Parsippany in New Jersey reported a smaller first-quarter loss on Wednesday of $8.01 per shares, compared to a loss per share of $14.35 a year earlier. Filings from Tuesday revealed that between April 22-23, Avis's majority shareholder, "Pentwater Capital Management", had sold millions of shares. Data compiled by LSEG revealed that two hedge funds – SRS Investment Management and Pentwater – owned more than 64% Avis’ total outstanding?shares. Pentwater reduced its holding from 7.77 million to 4.33 million shares. Pentwater didn't immediately respond to an?request for comments. Avis reported a 4% increase in revenue for the first quarter, reaching $2.53 billion. This was compared to an average analyst estimate of $2.43 'billion. According to LSEG calculations the?company clocked a loss adjusted of $7.85 per?share, compared to expectations of a $6.84 loss per share. (Reporting from Shashwat Chand in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Niket Nishan; Editing by Diti Pjara)
Fuel costs are increasing, so airlines are reducing their prices and cutting back on their outlook.
The U.S. and Israeli war against Iran, which has pushed up jet fuel prices, has shook the aviation industry around the world. Airlines have been forced to increase fares and revise their financial forecasts.
In recent weeks, jet fuel prices soared to $150-200 per barrel from $85-$90 per barrel. This is a major financial blow to an industry that relies on fuel for up to 25% of its operating costs.
Here is an alphabetical list of the ways airlines are responding to this issue:
AEGEAN AIRLINES
The Greek airline anticipates that the suspension of Middle East flights and the spike in fuel prices will have "notable impacts" on its results for the first quarter.
AIRASIA X
Malaysian Airlines executives announced that the company has cut 10% of its flights in the group and imposed a fuel surcharge of around 20%.
AIR FRANCE-KLM
The airline group announced that it would increase the price of long-haul tickets to "address rising fuel costs", with cabin fares to be raised by 50 euros ($58).
AIR INDIA
The Indian flag carrier said that it would revise the fuel surcharge, from a flat domestic rate to a grid based on distance. It said that fuel surcharges for international routes do not compensate for an exponential increase in jet fuel costs.
AIR NEW ZEALAND
On April 7, the airline announced that it would cut flights in May and June, and raise fares. It was among the first airlines to announce a large increase in ticket prices after the conflict began. The airline also suspended its earnings forecast for the full year due to volatility in the fuel markets.
AKASA AIR
Akasa Airlines, based in India, announced that it would be introducing fuel surcharges ranging from 199 to 1,300 Indian Rupees ($2 - $14) for domestic and international flights.
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Fuel prices are on the rise, and American Airlines expects to incur $400 million more in expenses for the first quarter.
CATHAY PACIFIC
Hong Kong Airlines announced that it will increase its fuel surcharges by 34% on all routes starting April 1, and to review them every 2 weeks. The CEO of the carrier said that it would maintain its flight capacity despite high fuel costs, but warned that the plan to increase passenger capacity by 10% could be changed if fuel prices rise.
CEBU AIR
The Philippines-based carrier said that the sharp increase in fuel prices is a major concern. It will continue to review pricing and network strategies and try to minimize the impact.
CHINA EASTERN EXPRESS AIRLINES
Air China said that it would increase fuel surcharges on domestic flights starting April 5. Flights of less than 800km will be charged a surcharge of 60 yuan, and flights above 800km will be charged a surcharge 120 yuan.
DELTA AIR LINES
Delta announced that it would reduce capacity by 3.5 percentage points compared to its original plan, and increase fees for checked baggage in order to offset the rising costs of jet fuel. The price of the first and second checked bags will increase $10 and the third bag will increase $50.
The U.S. airline canceled all capacity increases for the current quarter, and predicted profits below Wall Street expectations. The CEO of the company said that it would not update its full-year forecast due to uncertainty about how long fuel prices would rise.
EASYJET
EasyJet CEO Kentonjarvis warned that European consumers can expect to pay higher ticket prices at the end of the summer when fuel hedges end.
FRONTIER AÉRIENS
Fuel prices have increased dramatically since the airline issued its forecast for the full year.
GREATER BAY Airlines
The Hong Kong-based firm said that it will increase fuel surcharges for most routes from April 1 while maintaining charges on routes to mainland China and Japan.
The carrier has announced that the?surcharge' for flights between Hong Kong, Philippines and other destinations will double.
HONG KONG Airlines
The airline announced that it would increase fuel surcharges up to 35% starting March 12. The biggest increases would be on flights between Hong Kong, Bangladesh, and Nepal where the charges would go from HK$284 to HK$384 (US$49).
British Airways' owner IAG stated on March 10, that it does not intend to increase ticket price immediately as it has hedged a large amount of fuel in the short to medium term.
INDIGO
India's largest airline announced that it will begin charging fuel fees on both domestic and international flights as of March 14. The charges include 900 rupees per flight to the Middle East, and 2,300 rupees per flight to Europe. Sources say that the company is lobbying for the Indian government's reduction of fuel taxes.
JETBLUE AERWAYS
Low-cost airline based in the United States has announced that it will increase fees for optional services, such as checked luggage, due to "rising operating expenses". The airline said that baggage prices would rise either by $4 or $9.
Sources with knowledge of the situation have confirmed that KOREAN Air, South Korea's flag carrier, will be in emergency mode as oil prices rise. The airline will implement a phased response based on the oil price level and increase company-wide efficiency to offset rising fuel costs.
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS
Fuel surcharges are cited as the reason for raising domestic flight prices by $20, and international flights by up to $100.
Scandinavian Airlines announced that it would cancel 1000 flights in April due to high fuel and oil prices. In March, the airline said that it had cancelled "a couple hundred" flights.
SAS, which had already raised flight prices, stated that the surge in fuel prices would be a major blow to the aviation sector, even if they tried to absorb it.
SPRING AIRLINES
Budget Chinese airline announced that it will increase fuel surcharges for domestic flights starting April 5. Details to be revealed later.
SOUTHWEST?AIRLINES
The American carrier announced that it would increase the fees for checked bags by $10 each for the first two bags. This will bring the cost to $45 and $55 respectively for the first bag.
The Portuguese airline claimed that its price increases would partially offset the impact of fuel prices changes on its revenues.
THAI AIRWAYS
The Thailand-based airline said that it would increase fares between 10% and 15% in order to combat rising fuel prices.
TURKISH AIRLINES LUFTHANSA
SunExpress,?a joint venture of Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa said that it would impose temporary fuel surcharges of 10 euros per person on routes between Turkey, and Europe, starting May 1. Bookings made after April 1, for departures after May 1, will be subject to the surcharge.
UNITED AIRLINES
Scott Kirby, CEO of the U.S. carrier, said that the airline will cut unprofitable flights in the next two quarters to prepare for the oil price remaining above $100 by the end 2027.
Andrew Nocella, United's Chief Commercial Officer, said that the airline was able to increase fares in response to a rapid rise in jet fuel and oil prices. In an email, the carrier also announced that it would increase first and second checked baggage fees by $10 to customers traveling in the U.S.A., Mexico, Canada, and Latin America.
VIETJET
Vietnamese budget airline said it had reduced flight frequencies on certain routes due to possible fuel shortages.
VIETNAM Airline
Vietnam's Aviation Authority announced that the carrier will cancel 23 flights per day on domestic routes starting in April after it requested assistance from the government to remove a tax on jet fuel.
VIRGIN AUSTRALIA
Virgin Australia announced that it would be adjusting its fares in order to reflect the rising costs across the aviation industry, which were being exacerbated significantly by the Middle East situation.
WESTJET
Canadian Press reported that the airline would add a C$60 fuel surcharge ($43) to certain bookings, and also combine flights due to rising costs.
(source: Reuters)