Latest News

Bousso: Trump's Hormuz shipping plans are too little too late to avoid energy shock.

The current plan of U.S. president Donald Trump to revive shipping in the Strait of Hormuz through financial guarantees and security assistance requires a?herculean effort on behalf of international partners.

Even if it is successful, the relief will be limited as the time to avoid the worst economic consequences of the closing of this vital energy route is rapidly running out.

Trump said Tuesday that he had directed the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (IDFC) to provide financial guarantees and political risk insurance for maritime trade within the Gulf. He said that the U.S. Navy would begin escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz - the 'narrow shipping lane' between Iran and Oman, through which a fifth of the world's oil and gas is normally transported.

Washington is taking these measures to relieve pressure on the global energy market after the traffic through the Strait virtually halted on Saturday, following the launch of the joint U.S. and Israeli aerial bombardment against Iran.

Tehran responded by striking the neighbouring countries including their energy infrastructure and forcing the closure of Qatar's LNG production as well as Saudi Arabia's biggest oil refinery.

At least four other tankers were also attacked in or near Hormuz. This prompted many ship insurance companies and charterers suspending transit into and out of Gulf. Brent oil prices rose to $84 per barrel, their highest level since July 2024, after the closure. Stock markets in Asia were also sent tumbling as investors braced themselves for an economic shock.

Under the current circumstances, however, it is unlikely that the U.S. will reassure shippers.

In recent days, tanker freight rates have increased dramatically. Many routes are now at record levels. Chartering a crude ship capable of transporting 2 million barrels from the Gulf of Mexico to Asia costs $30 million. This is roughly 5% of cargo value at current rates and five times the cost at the beginning of the year.

A MUCH BIGGER CHALLENGE

Reduced costs will not reduce the risk of attack on vessels. U.S. Naval escorts could certainly reduce the risk but are unlikely to provide full protection from Iran's use of drones missiles and fast attack boats.

Washington's intervention to secure shipping routes in the region is not the first time.

During the "Tanker War", phase of the Iran/Iraq Conflict in the late 1980s the U.S. escorted Kuwaiti oil tanks under Operation Earnest Will, to deter Iranian attacks.

Today, the scale of this challenge is much?larger.

Since then, oil and gas exports have almost doubled to 20 million bpd. Qatar, the second largest LNG producer in the world, exported 80 million metric tonnes of LNG last year, which is about a fifth global demand. It wasn't a major player on the energy market in the 1980s.

It would be an enormous task to secure such huge volumes of oil, gasoline and tankers. Other countries' navy would most likely need assistance.

Even more important, it would take weeks, or even days to organize such an effort.

TIME IS FLYING BY

Both producers and consumers are running out of time.

Already, the blockade of Hormuz is forcing Gulf producers into reducing their output. Iraq reduced production by over 1.1 million barrels per day (bpd) on Tuesday, or roughly one quarter of the total amount of oil produced, due to lack of storage capacity. Officials warned that if the disruption continues, production could drop by over 3 million bpd in a matter of days.

Similar constraints apply to other producers.

Saudi Arabia is the largest crude oil exporter in the world. It shipped 7 million barrels per day (bpd) during February. Now, it's diverting some of its output to Yanbu, a Red Sea port, via a pipeline that can handle 5 million barrels per day. Yanbu has a maximum export capacity of 2 million barrels per day, which means that the Saudi Arabian kingdom is forced to store large amounts onshore.

According to Kayrros, Saudi Arabia has already stored 82 million barrels in its onshore storage facilities, which is around 56% of the capacity.

United Arab Emirates can divert up 1.5 million barrels per day through a pipeline bypassing Hormuz. Kayrros explained that this would mean tapping into storage which is currently around 40% full. About 34 million barrels are already held.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE could be forced to cut production further as a result of this.

ASIA'S ENERGY CRUSH

Consumers are also under increasing pressure.

Asian refiners, who are heavily dependent on Middle Eastern oil, are struggling to replace their supplies and will likely cut operating rates. Due to the shortage of oil, two Chinese refineries already have reduced their runs. India has also curtailed its gas supply to its industrial base.

The shock has rippled through the Asian financial markets. South Korea's KOSPI index has fallen 18% this week on concerns that Middle Eastern energy could disrupt the country's manufacturing and petrochemical sectors.

The main question is how long will the war last. Trump has said that the war could last for weeks. However, even if Trump's plans to reopen Hormuz are successful, it may not be possible to wait.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)